TABLE OF CONTENTS
1) Mainstream and Social media
2) Internet encyclopedias/ Search engines
3) Alternative News Media
*(comprehensive background information on most popular alternative media agencies)
1) Mainstream and Social media
2) Internet encyclopedias/ Search engines
3) Alternative News Media
*(comprehensive background information on most popular alternative media agencies)
MAINSTREAM AND SOCIAL MEDIA
Mainstream Media
We all know mainstream media is, but what exactly is mainstream media? Where do we draw the line on what is mainstream and what isn't? As Alternative media websites come to share a larger part in the news market its important to discern what is business, and what is activism, and what activism has been made into a business. You see just like cancer research is a billion dollar
I have put together this guide to alternative media, so you know who owns what, who is a legitimate threat to the establishment, and the ideology they are covertly trying to sell you. This page will be updated frequently as more information is brought to light.
Solutions from problems we face: Believe everything they say
I have put together this guide to alternative media, so you know who owns what, who is a legitimate threat to the establishment, and the ideology they are covertly trying to sell you. This page will be updated frequently as more information is brought to light.
Solutions from problems we face: Believe everything they say
Associated Press
Details: The associated press is an an amalgamation of all the disinformative news websites who have a stake in the matrix. Seldom will anything beyond conventional be revealed by this agency. What happens is all the lamestream media agencies send their reports to this agency, and can then use information contributed by others. Although 1/3 of the news is contributed by American owned media agencies, the AP is largley a global conspiracy. It claims to be non-profit however its revenues are upwards of 500 million a year!!!
Management: President Tom Curley is a Jewish Political Science Graduate
-Curley was the former president of the USA today, which is owned by the Gannet Company
Founded: 1846
Management: President Tom Curley is a Jewish Political Science Graduate
-Curley was the former president of the USA today, which is owned by the Gannet Company
Founded: 1846
Social Media
All social media, be it facebook, MSN, Twitter, DIGG, stumble upon, and anything with a widely accepted or refered by mainstream media (or websites below) should be considered for what it is, a way to monitor what sort of alternative and mainstream media people are circulating, it is a clever surveillance apparatus that our narcissism has entrapped us into demanding.
The proof of this is the incidence of advertisments and referrals from mainstream media agencies, one visit to any tech section of any news website confirms this self-perpetuating mindfuck.
The proof of this is the incidence of advertisments and referrals from mainstream media agencies, one visit to any tech section of any news website confirms this self-perpetuating mindfuck.
Meetup
Founder: Scott Heiferman
Founded: 2001
Purpose: The purpose of meetup is to dupe protestors into using the service to provide all the details of their plans to the powers that be. Its pretty simple.
Founded: 2001
Purpose: The purpose of meetup is to dupe protestors into using the service to provide all the details of their plans to the powers that be. Its pretty simple.
MAINSTREAM/SOCIAL ENCYCLOPEDIAS
Wikipedia
Owner: Wikimedia foundation (Owner: Jimmy Wales who is also an investment banker)
Funding: The website (that has no advertising) claims to keep it servers running solely on donations. They want you to believe that an investment banker whose educational background is limited to economics and finance, is going to create a non-profit website, just... because. The complete list of donors can be found here. Based on this corporate sponsorship its only rational to believe that wikipedia would not publish anything that would compromise the status quo. Although Wales defines himself as an objectivist libertarian it is hard to imagine his integrity in that role.
Agenda: To be in the first page of search results for EVERY search, and to be the largest (done) encyclopedia on earth. Thanks to crucial corporate funding from Google, this has been an easy task. Ensuring that the first and de facto source for all information is on one website ensures tight hegemonic control over all knowledge, and post hence information. Any anti-establishment ramblings on wikipedia are presented in such a way so to be non-compromising to the oppressive system which permitted it to spawn.
Funding: The website (that has no advertising) claims to keep it servers running solely on donations. They want you to believe that an investment banker whose educational background is limited to economics and finance, is going to create a non-profit website, just... because. The complete list of donors can be found here. Based on this corporate sponsorship its only rational to believe that wikipedia would not publish anything that would compromise the status quo. Although Wales defines himself as an objectivist libertarian it is hard to imagine his integrity in that role.
Agenda: To be in the first page of search results for EVERY search, and to be the largest (done) encyclopedia on earth. Thanks to crucial corporate funding from Google, this has been an easy task. Ensuring that the first and de facto source for all information is on one website ensures tight hegemonic control over all knowledge, and post hence information. Any anti-establishment ramblings on wikipedia are presented in such a way so to be non-compromising to the oppressive system which permitted it to spawn.
Google
Founders: Sergey M. Brin and Lawrence E. Page (And lets face it the fucking CIA)
Answers.com
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
ASK.com
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Yahoo Answers
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
ALTERNATIVE NEWS MEDIA
In alphabetical order
Adbusters
Owners: Kalle Lasn and Bill Schmalz (Canadian)
Agenda: The website/ Magazine proclaims to be "a global network of artists, activists, writers, pranksters, students, educators and entrepreneurs who want to advance the new social activist movement of the information age". However they have seldom lived up the task of going above and beyond critiquing consumerism (which they fight by selling magazines), and won't touch contraversial issues (like 9/11) with a ten foot pole. Their reluctance to address the fundamental issues at work with regards to the current monetary system are enough to write this publication off as another group
The website claims to be above and beyond mainstream media perspectives, however their view and the activism they promote (like Buy nothing day) seldom accomplish anything other then appeasing the conscience of moral morons who don't really want to amend their way of life, nor concede their western priviledges rather want to feel holier than thou.
Solutions: Buy their shoes instead of Nikes, don't buy anything for one day out of the year, refrain from using the internet for one week out of the year and um... well thats pretty much it.
Agenda: The website/ Magazine proclaims to be "a global network of artists, activists, writers, pranksters, students, educators and entrepreneurs who want to advance the new social activist movement of the information age". However they have seldom lived up the task of going above and beyond critiquing consumerism (which they fight by selling magazines), and won't touch contraversial issues (like 9/11) with a ten foot pole. Their reluctance to address the fundamental issues at work with regards to the current monetary system are enough to write this publication off as another group
The website claims to be above and beyond mainstream media perspectives, however their view and the activism they promote (like Buy nothing day) seldom accomplish anything other then appeasing the conscience of moral morons who don't really want to amend their way of life, nor concede their western priviledges rather want to feel holier than thou.
Solutions: Buy their shoes instead of Nikes, don't buy anything for one day out of the year, refrain from using the internet for one week out of the year and um... well thats pretty much it.
911 Truth.org
Management: Senior media coordinator: Mike Berger Current Executive director janice Matthews
(Established 2004)
Funding: Apparently donation based/ Store
Agenda: Janice Matthews has close ties to John Gold, someone I am reluctant to trust for his blatant disregard of the evidence ado with the controlled demolition with the WTC (in spite of the fact that the website purports this view, at the very bottom of its page).
The website in itself is quite objective and organized, and appears at first glance to examine 9/11 from all angles, although as in the cases of most mainstream 9/11 websites it tends to underestimate the Zionist question, if only intermittingly touching upon it to appease its viewers. To the websites credit it is a reliable and up to date source for 9/11 information, not so much with regards to the research which is better sought out at 9/11 reading room, but with its coverage of all events and new revelations within the 9/11 truth movement, except of course for its understimation of Israeli involvement I don't have much bad to say about this website.
(Established 2004)
Funding: Apparently donation based/ Store
Agenda: Janice Matthews has close ties to John Gold, someone I am reluctant to trust for his blatant disregard of the evidence ado with the controlled demolition with the WTC (in spite of the fact that the website purports this view, at the very bottom of its page).
The website in itself is quite objective and organized, and appears at first glance to examine 9/11 from all angles, although as in the cases of most mainstream 9/11 websites it tends to underestimate the Zionist question, if only intermittingly touching upon it to appease its viewers. To the websites credit it is a reliable and up to date source for 9/11 information, not so much with regards to the research which is better sought out at 9/11 reading room, but with its coverage of all events and new revelations within the 9/11 truth movement, except of course for its understimation of Israeli involvement I don't have much bad to say about this website.
911 Blogger
Management: Anonymous bloggers
Funding: Advertising and a store, which is claimed to only cover 15% of the websites costs, how they are able to make up the other 85% (about 850$) is subject to question.
Agenda: Exactley similiar to 9/11 truth, although a bit more upfront with its attention to the controlled demolition hypothesis. Do to the sites need for ad revenue, it can appear to be have a libertarian political affiliation, and similiar to 9/11 truth, it pays little if any attention to the overwhelming evidence of Israeli involvment in 9/11 as well as a disregard to thr prominence of Ashkenazi suspects
(Established 2005)
Funding: Advertising and a store, which is claimed to only cover 15% of the websites costs, how they are able to make up the other 85% (about 850$) is subject to question.
Agenda: Exactley similiar to 9/11 truth, although a bit more upfront with its attention to the controlled demolition hypothesis. Do to the sites need for ad revenue, it can appear to be have a libertarian political affiliation, and similiar to 9/11 truth, it pays little if any attention to the overwhelming evidence of Israeli involvment in 9/11 as well as a disregard to thr prominence of Ashkenazi suspects
(Established 2005)
Al Jazeera
Management: OWNER: Sheikh Hamad bin Thamer bin Mohammed bin Thani Al-Thani CHIEF EDITOR:
Ahmed Sheikh (A Palestinians from the west bank)
Established in 1996 with a 137 million dollar grant from Qatarian Prince, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa. It should be noted that Qatar is an exceptionally wealthy nation with a vested interest in preserving oil interest in the region. Since the Iraq war Al Jazeera has become increaingly more mainstream, which in many cases has been required for it to recieve the global recognition it has as a reliable source for information, but slightly more contraversial by western standards (meaning not even close to the truth)
“I wish all Arab media were like Al-Jazeera,” – Gideon Ezra, former deputy head of Israeli General Security Service, quoted in ‘Foreign Policy (FP)’, July/August 2006 issue.
If an Israeli likes the channel, it clearly shows the policy orientation of the station lol
For the Arabs who until 1990 only had television channels owned by the government and barely had a room for freedom of speech, the rise of this Al Jazeera was like a breeze to them and they found the ideal platform to decompress their political frustration through the numerous talk shows offered by the channel.
It started quite well I must say and people were calling it the "CNN" of the Arab world not in terms of the bias but in terms of great graphics and good reporters.
Once they ensured that people took the bait, the channel started showing its true colors and the fact that the station is based in Qatar, a country that has strong ties with Israel and has an Israeli commercial office there, critics were numerous denouncing the hidden agenda of the channel. It reached its peak though when it became the mouthpiece of OBL with all the fake videos it aired and to every " destroy America" sang in Al Jazeera, there were immediate consequences taken in the West against Muslim community.
The announced mission of the channel is of course to bypass the propaganda and the rigidity of the government owned channels in the Arab region, but that's the surface of the reality.
They also have a very famous program called " shari'a and life" in which they ALWAYS host a Wahhabi ( extremist scholar from the Saudi cult), supporting the suicide bombers etc….
Also, their coverage of other international news like Obama's campaign is not different from any mainstream networks. The majority of Al Jazeera staff were former BBC ( Arabic) anchors and reporters and was the first channel to call Israel by its name btw, many Arab channels ( until today) speak of Israel as the Zionist state!!!So objectively speaking, it's really not different from Haaretz coverage of the Middle East stories…
Those who think the channel is an all out media war against Israel, should just see their daily guests from Israel ( ministers, deputes, etc) sometimes in the middle of a bloody week where Israelis are busy attacking Palestinian villages and cities, the channel is continuously criticized for giving tribune to israelis but like I said, their budget ( suspicious) allows them to have correspondents in the four corners of the globe so it still attracts with its journalistic capacity.
Ahmed Sheikh (A Palestinians from the west bank)
Established in 1996 with a 137 million dollar grant from Qatarian Prince, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa. It should be noted that Qatar is an exceptionally wealthy nation with a vested interest in preserving oil interest in the region. Since the Iraq war Al Jazeera has become increaingly more mainstream, which in many cases has been required for it to recieve the global recognition it has as a reliable source for information, but slightly more contraversial by western standards (meaning not even close to the truth)
“I wish all Arab media were like Al-Jazeera,” – Gideon Ezra, former deputy head of Israeli General Security Service, quoted in ‘Foreign Policy (FP)’, July/August 2006 issue.
If an Israeli likes the channel, it clearly shows the policy orientation of the station lol
For the Arabs who until 1990 only had television channels owned by the government and barely had a room for freedom of speech, the rise of this Al Jazeera was like a breeze to them and they found the ideal platform to decompress their political frustration through the numerous talk shows offered by the channel.
It started quite well I must say and people were calling it the "CNN" of the Arab world not in terms of the bias but in terms of great graphics and good reporters.
Once they ensured that people took the bait, the channel started showing its true colors and the fact that the station is based in Qatar, a country that has strong ties with Israel and has an Israeli commercial office there, critics were numerous denouncing the hidden agenda of the channel. It reached its peak though when it became the mouthpiece of OBL with all the fake videos it aired and to every " destroy America" sang in Al Jazeera, there were immediate consequences taken in the West against Muslim community.
The announced mission of the channel is of course to bypass the propaganda and the rigidity of the government owned channels in the Arab region, but that's the surface of the reality.
They also have a very famous program called " shari'a and life" in which they ALWAYS host a Wahhabi ( extremist scholar from the Saudi cult), supporting the suicide bombers etc….
Also, their coverage of other international news like Obama's campaign is not different from any mainstream networks. The majority of Al Jazeera staff were former BBC ( Arabic) anchors and reporters and was the first channel to call Israel by its name btw, many Arab channels ( until today) speak of Israel as the Zionist state!!!So objectively speaking, it's really not different from Haaretz coverage of the Middle East stories…
Those who think the channel is an all out media war against Israel, should just see their daily guests from Israel ( ministers, deputes, etc) sometimes in the middle of a bloody week where Israelis are busy attacking Palestinian villages and cities, the channel is continuously criticized for giving tribune to israelis but like I said, their budget ( suspicious) allows them to have correspondents in the four corners of the globe so it still attracts with its journalistic capacity.
Alternet.com
Owners and key players: The Hybrid Vigor Institute (Director Denise Coruso who has ties to washington via the shill 'Public Knowledge/ public interest group which pretends to preserve peoples rights on the internet) > Independent Media Institute (Owner= Jeff von Kaenal, Executive director Don Hazen) > Alternet (and a website called "wiretap!")
Viewers: 3 million per month
Politrick: Progressive/ Liberal/ Socialist (phoney socialist)
Agenda: Play the role of the token liberal website, by claiming to advocate social justice while never addressing the underlying roots of these injustices, nor promoting substantial resistance and activism towards this end. By fronting as a bastion of false hope for Obamanites the website serves the purpose of sustaining the left/ right political dialectic, nit picking at some real, and some exaggerated claims coming from the intellectually challenged people on the right. (*Its a fact that people on the left have higher IQs and are less selfish, that is not to say they are not naive, in many cases they are more naive, but only because they are nice, wheras people on the right tend to exaggerate and be overly paranoid, these people are literally and foolishly fearless!!!!). The website is hailed as "amplifying the best of Alternative media by wikipedia (discussed above).
In posing as a website advocating the human justice needs of all human beings, one would be shocked (unless educated) that all of the senior editors are white (mainly Jewish)
Solutions to problem we face: Argue with idiot conservatives.
Viewers: 3 million per month
Politrick: Progressive/ Liberal/ Socialist (phoney socialist)
Agenda: Play the role of the token liberal website, by claiming to advocate social justice while never addressing the underlying roots of these injustices, nor promoting substantial resistance and activism towards this end. By fronting as a bastion of false hope for Obamanites the website serves the purpose of sustaining the left/ right political dialectic, nit picking at some real, and some exaggerated claims coming from the intellectually challenged people on the right. (*Its a fact that people on the left have higher IQs and are less selfish, that is not to say they are not naive, in many cases they are more naive, but only because they are nice, wheras people on the right tend to exaggerate and be overly paranoid, these people are literally and foolishly fearless!!!!). The website is hailed as "amplifying the best of Alternative media by wikipedia (discussed above).
In posing as a website advocating the human justice needs of all human beings, one would be shocked (unless educated) that all of the senior editors are white (mainly Jewish)
Solutions to problem we face: Argue with idiot conservatives.
American Freepress
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Anti-war.com
Management: Founded by *Eric Garris and Justin Raimondo under the auspices of the Randolph Bourne Institute
(Established 1995) I should add that in spite of his conservative leanings, he is openly gay.
Politrick: Libertarian, however the websites senior editor supports apparently supports Dennis Kuciinitch as much as he does Ron Paul. And Eric Garris came from a family with strong communist affiliation.
Agenda: Oddly, the primary agenda of the website is not to stop war but "to show how the imperialistic tendencies of the American government lead to a loss of civil liberties and a centralization of political power" insofar as the libertarian spirit is thriving on the website it appears that it touts the same brand of American libertarianism which caused these problems to take root. It attempts to cater to all sides, having a gay editorial staff, but seemingly condoning the free market paradigm.
I have often wondered if this website was set up to commandeer and steer anti-war protestors in the united states towards whicever desired end.
(Established 1995) I should add that in spite of his conservative leanings, he is openly gay.
Politrick: Libertarian, however the websites senior editor supports apparently supports Dennis Kuciinitch as much as he does Ron Paul. And Eric Garris came from a family with strong communist affiliation.
Agenda: Oddly, the primary agenda of the website is not to stop war but "to show how the imperialistic tendencies of the American government lead to a loss of civil liberties and a centralization of political power" insofar as the libertarian spirit is thriving on the website it appears that it touts the same brand of American libertarianism which caused these problems to take root. It attempts to cater to all sides, having a gay editorial staff, but seemingly condoning the free market paradigm.
I have often wondered if this website was set up to commandeer and steer anti-war protestors in the united states towards whicever desired end.
Above Top Secret.com
Owner: The above Network (Bill Irvine and Simon Gray)
Reach: 4 million visits a month
Agenda:
1) To reduce rebellion to a bad joke that is easily laughed away by intellectuals and academics.
2) To add to the negative and tinfoil hat depiction of anyone who uses the word conspiracy, essentially they want to have a monopoly over the word itself. By mixing proposterous stories in with plausible ones they are able to accomplish this task. Through numerous hokey programs like the Conspiracy chicks, serious issues are reduced to a cartoon.
3) To propogate radically right wing ideas, including homophobia, racism, thereby fueling the political divide it proclaims to be "above"
Solutions: Sweet fuck all, except sell advertisements and distract the mentally challenged with alien/ UFO rhetoric.
Reach: 4 million visits a month
Agenda:
1) To reduce rebellion to a bad joke that is easily laughed away by intellectuals and academics.
2) To add to the negative and tinfoil hat depiction of anyone who uses the word conspiracy, essentially they want to have a monopoly over the word itself. By mixing proposterous stories in with plausible ones they are able to accomplish this task. Through numerous hokey programs like the Conspiracy chicks, serious issues are reduced to a cartoon.
3) To propogate radically right wing ideas, including homophobia, racism, thereby fueling the political divide it proclaims to be "above"
Solutions: Sweet fuck all, except sell advertisements and distract the mentally challenged with alien/ UFO rhetoric.
AVAAZ
BBC5
Owners: Self describe as "A UK based independent production collective, comprised of individuals committed to progressive journalism and the observance of truth." The website claims it has no affiliation with the BBC.
Content: Mostly popular videos (popular in an undeground sense
Agenda: The Websites content is fairly tame and entry level in terms of truth media. It is a good gateway drug, and its high end in terms of website design and production, although lacks depth.
Content: Mostly popular videos (popular in an undeground sense
Agenda: The Websites content is fairly tame and entry level in terms of truth media. It is a good gateway drug, and its high end in terms of website design and production, although lacks depth.
Before its news
Owners: Little Blue Marble, LLC, a California> Before its news> Alicia Molnar VP
Agenda: The website claims to "allow almost anyone to write about anything" however one would be hardpressed to find a story that is not mcarthiest in nature, I have seldom come across any SERIOUS article on the website that touted what could be viewed as a leftist perspective. In the websites quest to live up to its title, there is everything ranging from "spaceships are heading towards earth", to things more rooted in reality such as critiques of the BP coverup.
I have asked the VP of this website (the only identifiable person) who owns it, I have yet to have a response.
Agenda: The website claims to "allow almost anyone to write about anything" however one would be hardpressed to find a story that is not mcarthiest in nature, I have seldom come across any SERIOUS article on the website that touted what could be viewed as a leftist perspective. In the websites quest to live up to its title, there is everything ranging from "spaceships are heading towards earth", to things more rooted in reality such as critiques of the BP coverup.
I have asked the VP of this website (the only identifiable person) who owns it, I have yet to have a response.
Bill Maher
Manager: Time/ Warner> HBO> Bill Maher
Politrick: Neo-liberalism masquerading as radical liberal
Agenda: To ridicule anyone and everything that may compromise his cushy job as a primetime propaganda artist. In Bills 2008 film religulous he goes out of his way to paint Islam as anti-semitic, whilst walking out like a sell out bitch on a rabbi who was was arguing against Zionism and its apartheid policies. Bill is establishment shill to the bone, Zionist frontman numero uno. Anyone who questions 9/11 is a lunatic, and he seldom goes beyond takling the token leftist perspective, appeasing the good conscience of his viewers by demanding the rich pay slightly more taxes... so they can remain in power and keep him employed.
Politrick: Neo-liberalism masquerading as radical liberal
Agenda: To ridicule anyone and everything that may compromise his cushy job as a primetime propaganda artist. In Bills 2008 film religulous he goes out of his way to paint Islam as anti-semitic, whilst walking out like a sell out bitch on a rabbi who was was arguing against Zionism and its apartheid policies. Bill is establishment shill to the bone, Zionist frontman numero uno. Anyone who questions 9/11 is a lunatic, and he seldom goes beyond takling the token leftist perspective, appeasing the good conscience of his viewers by demanding the rich pay slightly more taxes... so they can remain in power and keep him employed.
The Black Commentator
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Brasscheck TV
A youtuibe video amalgamation hub. They really just post youtube videos on their own servers, and don't realy post any disclaimers although the titles of their categories reveal some of their understandings.
CAMERA
Christian science monitor
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Coast to Coast
Manager: FOUNDER: Art Bell (total shill or moron in terms of real world affairs), A syndicated radio show/ Website, Current HOST: George Noory
Politic: Doesnt dabble too much in politics, essentially (perhaps willfully) steering people away from researching things of material significance.
Funding: Online subrscriptions and advertising
Agenda: the website deals with paranormal phenomenon, UFOS and are proponents of the 2012 hypothesis that something significant will happen. Most of what Art Bell and george Noory Have prophecized hasn't come to pass, they dabble in what sometimes appears to be the profoundly absurd, from people who live miles below the earth, to "shadow" people. Art Bell for instance doesnt find Alien coverups by the US government to be at all outlandish, while at the same time approaching anyone who has legitimate questions about the 9/11 coverup with shrewed shill-like contempt. You won't get much out of this website asides from entertainment, its a modern day toned down, ongoing war of the worlds broadcast.
Politic: Doesnt dabble too much in politics, essentially (perhaps willfully) steering people away from researching things of material significance.
Funding: Online subrscriptions and advertising
Agenda: the website deals with paranormal phenomenon, UFOS and are proponents of the 2012 hypothesis that something significant will happen. Most of what Art Bell and george Noory Have prophecized hasn't come to pass, they dabble in what sometimes appears to be the profoundly absurd, from people who live miles below the earth, to "shadow" people. Art Bell for instance doesnt find Alien coverups by the US government to be at all outlandish, while at the same time approaching anyone who has legitimate questions about the 9/11 coverup with shrewed shill-like contempt. You won't get much out of this website asides from entertainment, its a modern day toned down, ongoing war of the worlds broadcast.
Conspiracy Planet
Owner: New Improved Entertainment Corp.(1 406 333 9079)
Politrick: No poolitical ideology is real blatant, although it appears to be a libertarian leaning website.
Agenda: A typical conspiracy news hub that is updated regularily.
Politrick: No poolitical ideology is real blatant, although it appears to be a libertarian leaning website.
Agenda: A typical conspiracy news hub that is updated regularily.
Conscious Media Network
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Consortium News
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Corbett Report
Owner: James Corbett (512)553-0297
Politrick: Libertariané constitutionalist.
Reach: Moderate youtube viewership ranging from 2000-10000 hits per video not counting embedded viewing.
Agenda: the website links to infowars, Rense.com and others of the sort, its agenda coincides with theres, he too is ultimatley pushing the same agenda as these websites, a misguided advocacy for personal liberty with no consideration as to how this personal liberty will be utilized by the people who currently own everything.
Politrick: Libertariané constitutionalist.
Reach: Moderate youtube viewership ranging from 2000-10000 hits per video not counting embedded viewing.
Agenda: the website links to infowars, Rense.com and others of the sort, its agenda coincides with theres, he too is ultimatley pushing the same agenda as these websites, a misguided advocacy for personal liberty with no consideration as to how this personal liberty will be utilized by the people who currently own everything.
Counterpunch
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Cryptome
Owner: John Young and Deborah Natsios (webhost: Verio) 212-873-8700 , they also run Cartome.org which is an archive of news, documents, images etc. Founded in 1996.
Politrick: Stays away from taking or pushing any direct political ideology
Agenda: To disseminate information, similiar to wikileaks only more trustworthy, in part due to its lack of promotion on mainstream media, and its criticism of Wikileaks being an intelligence operation. This is a very good source for information. The website has come under fire the FBI, Microsoft and Paypal, so I would say it is a legitimate source oof information, which is not to say that any of the information is highly damaging to the establishment.
"Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and secret governance—open, secret and classified documents—but not limited to those."
Politrick: Stays away from taking or pushing any direct political ideology
Agenda: To disseminate information, similiar to wikileaks only more trustworthy, in part due to its lack of promotion on mainstream media, and its criticism of Wikileaks being an intelligence operation. This is a very good source for information. The website has come under fire the FBI, Microsoft and Paypal, so I would say it is a legitimate source oof information, which is not to say that any of the information is highly damaging to the establishment.
"Cryptome welcomes documents for publication that are prohibited by governments worldwide, in particular material on freedom of expression, privacy, cryptology, dual-use technologies, national security, intelligence, and secret governance—open, secret and classified documents—but not limited to those."
Daily Mail
Owner: Associated Newspapers ltd. > Daily Mail newspaper> Dailymail.com > Editor: Paul Dacre
Contact: (020) 7752 8400
Reach: Second largest selling newspaper in Britain
Polirtick: libertarian-authoritarian Conservatism (Fascism)
Founded: 1896 by Lord Northcliffe and Lord Rothermere (an alleged Nazi supporter noting that Hitler's work was "great and superhuman".)
Agenda: The agenda of the dailymail is strictly consevrative in nature. It reads like a well groomed tabloid, periodically dabbling in topics that allude to the big brother state (particularly in its tech section). The stories published tend to be exaggerated toward the end of catering to its predominantly conservative audience (51%). It is similiar to russia today in the sense that it will SOMETIMES post contraversial information, however it is far more tame, and is utilized toward the end of keeping the right side of the political dialectic appeased. Be very skeptical of EVERYTHING you read on this website, and if you have to link it or share it via social media, be sure to add a brief disclaimer that this may in fact be bullshit.
Contact: (020) 7752 8400
Reach: Second largest selling newspaper in Britain
Polirtick: libertarian-authoritarian Conservatism (Fascism)
Founded: 1896 by Lord Northcliffe and Lord Rothermere (an alleged Nazi supporter noting that Hitler's work was "great and superhuman".)
Agenda: The agenda of the dailymail is strictly consevrative in nature. It reads like a well groomed tabloid, periodically dabbling in topics that allude to the big brother state (particularly in its tech section). The stories published tend to be exaggerated toward the end of catering to its predominantly conservative audience (51%). It is similiar to russia today in the sense that it will SOMETIMES post contraversial information, however it is far more tame, and is utilized toward the end of keeping the right side of the political dialectic appeased. Be very skeptical of EVERYTHING you read on this website, and if you have to link it or share it via social media, be sure to add a brief disclaimer that this may in fact be bullshit.
David Icke
Owner: David Vaughan Icke
Politrick: Originally was a advocate of the green party, but since an encounter with a psychic (which precipated the end of his mainstream career as a BBC sports anchor) he became a self-titled New age conspiracy theorist. David Icke claims an agnostic/ athiestic stance, insisting that religion is an opiate to control the masses.
Agenda: David icke has been banned from speaking in certain establishment, particularily in Canada. The reason for this is that he explictly claims that the world is being run by shapeshifting reptoids from another planet. The reason for his censorship is that many (perhaps the establishment itself) have claimed that this is code for Jew, and he has thus fallen victim to the criticism of antisemitic. He claims that the reptilians authored the protocols of the learned elders of Zion writings which claim to disavow a jwish plot for global domination. The mainstream line of thining is that the collection of writings were an attempt to scapegoat the Jews and subvert the bolshevik revolution in Russia in the early 20th century. Wikipedia insists that this document is a forgery to the point of total absolution, which leads anyone in the know of how this shit works to suspect otherwise. It claims that the document is PROVEN to be a forgery, yet gives no real evidence for this, mind you there is no evidence to prove that its real either.
Ironically it was the times who initially "exposed it as a forgery" the same magazine who only a year earlier hailed it as accurate the times is currently owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch. More ironically perhaps was the publications support of Hitler and Nazi "appeasement".
Its very likely that David Icke has just woven together this fantastic story to sell books and make money, although one has to ask, why would a well paid and reknown BBC correspondant ruin his career to pursue this precarious role as the guy who believes reptiles run the earth. He may be an agent, in fact he may be a bridge for leftist progressive types to hop on board the conservative train. His new age appraoch reaches a broad audience, in some cases appealing to those on the left who are seeking some sort of spiritual transcendance or conspirituality. In this respect he could be viewed as a segue into fascist thinking, or he could just be a quack, regardless on thing is clear, his talk of reptilians conspiracy has brought a lot of negative attention
After an early falling out with Alex Jones, in which Jones claimed Icke was an agent that was their to make any dissident look like a fool, they reconciled their differences years later. Perhaps in an attempt to expand their readership, they reconciled their differences.
Politrick: Originally was a advocate of the green party, but since an encounter with a psychic (which precipated the end of his mainstream career as a BBC sports anchor) he became a self-titled New age conspiracy theorist. David Icke claims an agnostic/ athiestic stance, insisting that religion is an opiate to control the masses.
Agenda: David icke has been banned from speaking in certain establishment, particularily in Canada. The reason for this is that he explictly claims that the world is being run by shapeshifting reptoids from another planet. The reason for his censorship is that many (perhaps the establishment itself) have claimed that this is code for Jew, and he has thus fallen victim to the criticism of antisemitic. He claims that the reptilians authored the protocols of the learned elders of Zion writings which claim to disavow a jwish plot for global domination. The mainstream line of thining is that the collection of writings were an attempt to scapegoat the Jews and subvert the bolshevik revolution in Russia in the early 20th century. Wikipedia insists that this document is a forgery to the point of total absolution, which leads anyone in the know of how this shit works to suspect otherwise. It claims that the document is PROVEN to be a forgery, yet gives no real evidence for this, mind you there is no evidence to prove that its real either.
Ironically it was the times who initially "exposed it as a forgery" the same magazine who only a year earlier hailed it as accurate the times is currently owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch. More ironically perhaps was the publications support of Hitler and Nazi "appeasement".
Its very likely that David Icke has just woven together this fantastic story to sell books and make money, although one has to ask, why would a well paid and reknown BBC correspondant ruin his career to pursue this precarious role as the guy who believes reptiles run the earth. He may be an agent, in fact he may be a bridge for leftist progressive types to hop on board the conservative train. His new age appraoch reaches a broad audience, in some cases appealing to those on the left who are seeking some sort of spiritual transcendance or conspirituality. In this respect he could be viewed as a segue into fascist thinking, or he could just be a quack, regardless on thing is clear, his talk of reptilians conspiracy has brought a lot of negative attention
After an early falling out with Alex Jones, in which Jones claimed Icke was an agent that was their to make any dissident look like a fool, they reconciled their differences years later. Perhaps in an attempt to expand their readership, they reconciled their differences.
Democratic Underground.com
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Democracy now
Owners: Founders Amy Goodman (president), Allan Nairne (director), Juan Gonzalez (secretary), Larry Bensky, Salim Muwakkil, and Julie Drizin
was founded in 1996 at WBAI-FM in New York City, syndicated with Pacifica radio.
Reach: The program is currently broadcast on over 850 radio and television stations and is growing daily.
Funding: "Democracy Now! is funded entirely through contributions from listeners, viewers, and foundations. We do not accept advertisers, corporate underwriting, or government funding." their contrubitions and grants based on IRS tax forms in 2008 indicate a its a 4 million dollar annual operation. Allegedly, some of this funding MAY have come from the Rockefeller corporation.
NPR, community, and college radio stations; on public access, PBS, satellite television
Politrick: Socialist/ Communist
Agenda: Democracy now is similiar to alternet in every possible way, it deals with social justice issues, or at least... reports on them. They have facilitated debates between popular science shills and Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas, although seldom go above and beyond token left wing criticisms of the establishment, advocating justice, but never approaching the key players, not the zionists hand.
(*democracy now! is written with an exclamation mark). Because they know its a big fucking joke.
was founded in 1996 at WBAI-FM in New York City, syndicated with Pacifica radio.
Reach: The program is currently broadcast on over 850 radio and television stations and is growing daily.
Funding: "Democracy Now! is funded entirely through contributions from listeners, viewers, and foundations. We do not accept advertisers, corporate underwriting, or government funding." their contrubitions and grants based on IRS tax forms in 2008 indicate a its a 4 million dollar annual operation. Allegedly, some of this funding MAY have come from the Rockefeller corporation.
NPR, community, and college radio stations; on public access, PBS, satellite television
Politrick: Socialist/ Communist
Agenda: Democracy now is similiar to alternet in every possible way, it deals with social justice issues, or at least... reports on them. They have facilitated debates between popular science shills and Dylan Avery and Jason Bermas, although seldom go above and beyond token left wing criticisms of the establishment, advocating justice, but never approaching the key players, not the zionists hand.
(*democracy now! is written with an exclamation mark). Because they know its a big fucking joke.
Disclose TV
Owners: Disclose TV
Funding: Advertising, and a store, and undiclosed (LOL)
Reach: traffic ranking in the US is 8,856 so it reaches a fairly large audience for its genre
Agenda: to feed the delusions of UFO loving e-tards mostly, you will not find anything serious here, it is compatible with coast to coast AM, and doesnt really present much which cannot be found through above top secret or a combination of these other crackpit sites. That is not to say aliens don't exist, but face it, if it were true, would there be anything you could do about it whatsoever? No. its pure entertainment.
This site is very non-transparent, no indication of who its staff is nor its owner, editor.
Funding: Advertising, and a store, and undiclosed (LOL)
Reach: traffic ranking in the US is 8,856 so it reaches a fairly large audience for its genre
Agenda: to feed the delusions of UFO loving e-tards mostly, you will not find anything serious here, it is compatible with coast to coast AM, and doesnt really present much which cannot be found through above top secret or a combination of these other crackpit sites. That is not to say aliens don't exist, but face it, if it were true, would there be anything you could do about it whatsoever? No. its pure entertainment.
This site is very non-transparent, no indication of who its staff is nor its owner, editor.
Discovery Channel
Founder:John Hendricks of Discovery Communications
Disinformation
Owners: Initially funded by Tele-Communications Inc (one of the largest media corporations in the world) then came under the ownership of razorfish (as the owner of TC was said to not approve the website) it eventually became the Disinformation company when its staff allegedy went solo (based in NewYork) Gary Baddeley, President / CEO
Founded: 1996
Agenda: The website claims to be more progressive but open to ideas born from across the political spectrum. You will find some interesting stuff on this website, but usually only well after the same information has been published elsewhere. Typically there is a big lag on the website in terms of the info thats disavowed, so if you want to remain on the cutting edge you will have to
Reach: Traffic Rank in US: 6,644
Founded: 1996
Agenda: The website claims to be more progressive but open to ideas born from across the political spectrum. You will find some interesting stuff on this website, but usually only well after the same information has been published elsewhere. Typically there is a big lag on the website in terms of the info thats disavowed, so if you want to remain on the cutting edge you will have to
Reach: Traffic Rank in US: 6,644
Dissident Voice
Sunil K. Sharma, Editor and Publisher: He is formerly a researcher with the media watchdog group Project Censored,
kim@dissidentvoice.org
Reach is minimal but significant
Dissident Voice is based in Santa Rosa, California, United States of Empire
kim@dissidentvoice.org
Reach is minimal but significant
Dissident Voice is based in Santa Rosa, California, United States of Empire
Electronic Entifada
EI was founded by Ali Abunimah, Arjan El Fassed, Laurie King, and Nigel Parry.[2]
Hannah Brown of the Jerusalem Post calls EI "one of the most elaborate" sites giving a "Palestinian perspective of the news",
Hannah Brown of the Jerusalem Post calls EI "one of the most elaborate" sites giving a "Palestinian perspective of the news",
EU Times
Contact: http://www.eutimes.net/contact/
Reach: EU Times’s Global rank is 85,292
Background: Very little information is provided about the makers of this website, its clearly a haven for nationalists and Xenophobes who have recently taken a liking to referring to immigrants as the NWO. One look at their surveys page and the knowledged reader gets a sense for the type of leading questions they ask, and the moral caliber of their readers only 50% of wish think Russia should kill all its Muslims, to name a few. These are polss that the website conducts themselves, clearly providing and thus encouraging this primitive option. I have unknowingly linked to this website in the past, as it hooks you with stuff which is seemingly intelligent, only to keep you their long enough so they can start reforming your opinion. This website is blatant shit, putting most if not all the blame for the gross inequality of our day to IMMIGRANTS!!!
Reach: EU Times’s Global rank is 85,292
Background: Very little information is provided about the makers of this website, its clearly a haven for nationalists and Xenophobes who have recently taken a liking to referring to immigrants as the NWO. One look at their surveys page and the knowledged reader gets a sense for the type of leading questions they ask, and the moral caliber of their readers only 50% of wish think Russia should kill all its Muslims, to name a few. These are polss that the website conducts themselves, clearly providing and thus encouraging this primitive option. I have unknowingly linked to this website in the past, as it hooks you with stuff which is seemingly intelligent, only to keep you their long enough so they can start reforming your opinion. This website is blatant shit, putting most if not all the blame for the gross inequality of our day to IMMIGRANTS!!!
Examiner
Owners: Division of Clarity Media Groups David Schafer, their primary shareholder is conservative billionaire Philip Anschutz.
Reach: Boasts 50,000+ contributors, adds 3000 articles per day, readership is upwards of 20 million per month and growing very quickly..
Agenda: The benefit of this website is that it appears to provide a medium for citizen journalists. At once its greatest strength, it is also its greatest weakness in that many if not most of what is written on this website cannot be verified, Whats more is that out of 3000 articles a day, many will never see the front page. The Examiner may be a good place to pick up hearsay and maybe even teh insightful rare gem, but be sure to double check anything you post from that website.
Reach: Boasts 50,000+ contributors, adds 3000 articles per day, readership is upwards of 20 million per month and growing very quickly..
Agenda: The benefit of this website is that it appears to provide a medium for citizen journalists. At once its greatest strength, it is also its greatest weakness in that many if not most of what is written on this website cannot be verified, Whats more is that out of 3000 articles a day, many will never see the front page. The Examiner may be a good place to pick up hearsay and maybe even teh insightful rare gem, but be sure to double check anything you post from that website.
Fadsmashers
Owner: Nathan Human
Politrick: Revolutionary
Funding: None
Agenda: To call out the fakers, and the alternative media money makers. To provide a reliable source for information for inquiring minds, minus all of the indoctrination, ads, a nd shit you don't need.
Solution: Revolution
Politrick: Revolutionary
Funding: None
Agenda: To call out the fakers, and the alternative media money makers. To provide a reliable source for information for inquiring minds, minus all of the indoctrination, ads, a nd shit you don't need.
Solution: Revolution
Glenn Beck
Owners: News Corporation (Rupert Murdoch), his program came about literally as Obama was being elected in order to bolster the right, and ensure that mindfuck America stays split directly down the middle.
Former Alchoholic/ Drug addict, reformed christian right wing McCarthiest millionaire.
Agenda: A watered down more mainstream version of the other shill Alex Jones. There is absolutley nothing that can be learned from Glenn Beck other then how to sell-out shamelessly. He is basically their to repatriate the right, just so the next election (as always) will be a dead distracting heat to the finish.
For those who despise Beck: Remember this is only one side of the deception, they want you to defend yourself against this moron, and keep yourself distracted by his seemingly idiotic statements and acts which are of course entirely scripted.
For those who like Beck: Consider that the guy is on the bottom feeder of mainstream media i.e. Fox News, clearly catering to 50 year old xenophobes who can fire a gun better than they can spell. Asides from the fact that he is on primetime TV, and making money hand over fist, I think that it something worth considering when witnessing the shit that comes out of this guys mouth.
Former Alchoholic/ Drug addict, reformed christian right wing McCarthiest millionaire.
Agenda: A watered down more mainstream version of the other shill Alex Jones. There is absolutley nothing that can be learned from Glenn Beck other then how to sell-out shamelessly. He is basically their to repatriate the right, just so the next election (as always) will be a dead distracting heat to the finish.
For those who despise Beck: Remember this is only one side of the deception, they want you to defend yourself against this moron, and keep yourself distracted by his seemingly idiotic statements and acts which are of course entirely scripted.
For those who like Beck: Consider that the guy is on the bottom feeder of mainstream media i.e. Fox News, clearly catering to 50 year old xenophobes who can fire a gun better than they can spell. Asides from the fact that he is on primetime TV, and making money hand over fist, I think that it something worth considering when witnessing the shit that comes out of this guys mouth.
Global Research
Owners: Main editor is Michael Chossudovsky
Agenda:The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) is an independent research and media organization based in Montreal. The CRG is a registered non profit organization in the province of Quebec, Canada.
The website is one of the most intellectually well off of all the 'truth' style websites. Some great articles are written on the webpage, and equal consideration is given to all events, with sections for each continent. This website tends to stick to the facts, and doesn't explicitly politicize itself. It arguably is a resource for people on the right and left alike, at once appealing to nationalist right wingers for its anti-globalization anti-NWO feel, while appealing to liberals with its broad coverage of human justice issues. I have never had much bad to say about this webpage, namely because it is humble, is not plastered with advertisements, and is respected by high brow hackademics who will only read something if its wordy enough.
Irony: The irony for CGR's mission is the title of the website itself, which seems to be inadvertantly supporting at least to some extent, some global awareness of sorts.
Agenda:The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) is an independent research and media organization based in Montreal. The CRG is a registered non profit organization in the province of Quebec, Canada.
The website is one of the most intellectually well off of all the 'truth' style websites. Some great articles are written on the webpage, and equal consideration is given to all events, with sections for each continent. This website tends to stick to the facts, and doesn't explicitly politicize itself. It arguably is a resource for people on the right and left alike, at once appealing to nationalist right wingers for its anti-globalization anti-NWO feel, while appealing to liberals with its broad coverage of human justice issues. I have never had much bad to say about this webpage, namely because it is humble, is not plastered with advertisements, and is respected by high brow hackademics who will only read something if its wordy enough.
Irony: The irony for CGR's mission is the title of the website itself, which seems to be inadvertantly supporting at least to some extent, some global awareness of sorts.
Gov Track Us
Founder: Joshua Tauberer, princeton geek, self-proclaimed open government advocate. Founded Civic Impulse LLC and currently employed by LARSA
Reach: Widening, apparently even cited once by the New York Times
Agenda: Judging by the blatant illuminati symbolism on the top left hand corner of the page I am guessing the website is bullshit. Whats more is that its sophistication is superb, a lot of work was put into this website and I highly doubt it is maintained by one student, princeton or not. It claims to "enable its users to track the bills and members of the United States Congress. Users can add trackers to certain bills. The website collects data on Congress members, allowing the users to check voting records and attendance relative to peers."
take for instance CiviC Impulse LLC which they claim "builds tools that fosters civic participation and government transparency but also works with government staff and nonprofits on improving government data policy." So clearly they are in bed with Big brother.
Reach: Widening, apparently even cited once by the New York Times
Agenda: Judging by the blatant illuminati symbolism on the top left hand corner of the page I am guessing the website is bullshit. Whats more is that its sophistication is superb, a lot of work was put into this website and I highly doubt it is maintained by one student, princeton or not. It claims to "enable its users to track the bills and members of the United States Congress. Users can add trackers to certain bills. The website collects data on Congress members, allowing the users to check voting records and attendance relative to peers."
take for instance CiviC Impulse LLC which they claim "builds tools that fosters civic participation and government transparency but also works with government staff and nonprofits on improving government data policy." So clearly they are in bed with Big brother.
The Guardian
Owners: Gaurdian Media Group PLC < Scott Trust. Their editor since 1995 has been Alan Charles Rusbridger who was handpicked by Scott Trust (as all editors are to ensure the political focus of the newspaper remains liberal seeming.
Scott Trust: A charitable foundation existing between 1936 and 2008, which aimed to ensure the paper's editorial independence in perpetuity, maintaining its financial health to ensure it did not become vulnerable to take overs by for-profit media groups
Politrick: Apparently a larger liberal following
Reach: 220th in most visited global websites (as in HUGE)
Agenda: The agenda of the Gaurdian is no different then any site which is simply gaurding for its masters. Indeed you will find headlines on this website that you won't find on the more mainstream outlets, even on its sister New York times American counterpart, but don't be fooled, the boldness of the websites journalism only appears that way because of the generous backdrop of complete and utter bullshit. Websites like this are the gems of controlled alternative media, they provide useful links for conspiracy propagandists while feeding mainstream cynicism with its anti-establishment feel, but make no mistake they are not gaurding you.
Scott Trust: A charitable foundation existing between 1936 and 2008, which aimed to ensure the paper's editorial independence in perpetuity, maintaining its financial health to ensure it did not become vulnerable to take overs by for-profit media groups
Politrick: Apparently a larger liberal following
Reach: 220th in most visited global websites (as in HUGE)
Agenda: The agenda of the Gaurdian is no different then any site which is simply gaurding for its masters. Indeed you will find headlines on this website that you won't find on the more mainstream outlets, even on its sister New York times American counterpart, but don't be fooled, the boldness of the websites journalism only appears that way because of the generous backdrop of complete and utter bullshit. Websites like this are the gems of controlled alternative media, they provide useful links for conspiracy propagandists while feeding mainstream cynicism with its anti-establishment feel, but make no mistake they are not gaurding you.
Haaretz.com
Owners:Founded in 1918 as sponsored by the British Government, owned by the Schocken Family
Editor: Dov Alfon
Politrick: Liberal Zionist
The website claims to be staunchly anti-Zionist yet being based out of Israel and initially recieving support from the British Government, well its somewhat hard to buy into the sincerity of articles like this. Many state sponsored bloggers will go after haaretz as not being explicit enough in its ultimate support for the imperialist delusion fueled nightmare that is Israhell.
Background: Oldest Israeli newspaper (most criminal) In 2001, the pro-Israel media-monitoring and advocacy group CAMERA claimed that Haaretz fueled anti-Israel bias.former president Simon Peres (butcher of Gaza) was a frequent blogger.
Until 1989 the paper (The Jerusalem Post) supported the forerunners of the Labour Party. In 1989, the paper was purchased by Hollinger Inc. A number of journalists resigned from the Post after Conrad Black's takeover and founded the Jerusalem Report, a weekly magazine eventually sold to the Post. The leader of the walkout was David Landau, who founded Haaretz English Edition and went on to become editor-in-chief of Haaretz until 2009.
Editor: Dov Alfon
Politrick: Liberal Zionist
The website claims to be staunchly anti-Zionist yet being based out of Israel and initially recieving support from the British Government, well its somewhat hard to buy into the sincerity of articles like this. Many state sponsored bloggers will go after haaretz as not being explicit enough in its ultimate support for the imperialist delusion fueled nightmare that is Israhell.
Background: Oldest Israeli newspaper (most criminal) In 2001, the pro-Israel media-monitoring and advocacy group CAMERA claimed that Haaretz fueled anti-Israel bias.former president Simon Peres (butcher of Gaza) was a frequent blogger.
Until 1989 the paper (The Jerusalem Post) supported the forerunners of the Labour Party. In 1989, the paper was purchased by Hollinger Inc. A number of journalists resigned from the Post after Conrad Black's takeover and founded the Jerusalem Report, a weekly magazine eventually sold to the Post. The leader of the walkout was David Landau, who founded Haaretz English Edition and went on to become editor-in-chief of Haaretz until 2009.
The Independent
Founder: Alexander Yevgenievich Lebedev (multibillionaire born into a family of the Russian intelligentsia)/ Editor Simon Kelner, A UK newspaper.
Contact: newseditor@independent.co.uk or +44 (0)20 7005 2000
Reach: Significant, particularily in the UK where its circulated readership alone is nearly 200,000 per day.
Politrick: Self defines as more liberal, however the name, and indeed the content tend to attract those of the libertarian feather. Doesn't shy away from using blatant conspiratorial speak such as NWO which tends to attract as many well meaning open minded people as it does fundumentalist christian nutcases. I will say that there is a lot of interesting information posted on this website like most of the UK publications.
Contact: newseditor@independent.co.uk or +44 (0)20 7005 2000
Reach: Significant, particularily in the UK where its circulated readership alone is nearly 200,000 per day.
Politrick: Self defines as more liberal, however the name, and indeed the content tend to attract those of the libertarian feather. Doesn't shy away from using blatant conspiratorial speak such as NWO which tends to attract as many well meaning open minded people as it does fundumentalist christian nutcases. I will say that there is a lot of interesting information posted on this website like most of the UK publications.
Information Underground
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Independent Media Center
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Infowars.com (whores)
Owners: Midas resources> Genesis communications. Alex Jones (A website founded by Ted Anderson that was literally started with the sole aim of promoting the importance of investing in precious metals.)
Politrick: "Constitutionalist", Paleoconservative, Libertarian
Agenda: The agenda with Alex Jones is multifold
1) Control the people with guns with fear, promote anti-immigration sentiment and producerism.
2) Sell them gold, so the price perpetually increases, make enough money before shit hits fan and they bail to a foreign country.
3) Secure capitalism via posturing as neutral while being blatantly conservative in all respects.
Solution to problems we face: Buy gold and guns.
Politrick: "Constitutionalist", Paleoconservative, Libertarian
Agenda: The agenda with Alex Jones is multifold
1) Control the people with guns with fear, promote anti-immigration sentiment and producerism.
2) Sell them gold, so the price perpetually increases, make enough money before shit hits fan and they bail to a foreign country.
3) Secure capitalism via posturing as neutral while being blatantly conservative in all respects.
Solution to problems we face: Buy gold and guns.
Intel Hub
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Henry Makow
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Huffington Post
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Keith Olbermann
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Militant
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Mother Jones
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Nation
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Natural News
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Newser
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
New Dawn
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
New World Order report
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Off the grid News
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Pakalert Press
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Palestine Telegraph
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Press TV
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Public Knowledge
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Raw Story
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Real Clear Politics
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Real News
Owner: Paul Jay (Former producer with the CBC broadcasting corporation= Ziovision)
Politrick: Leftist in most of their views as evidenced in their contributors (Lewis H. Lapham, Gore Vidal, Amy Goodman, Naomi Klein, and (formerly) Howard Zinn.)
Funding: The website claims to be solely non-profit based and not accepting funding from corporations or governments, their most recent fundraising campaign is approaching .5 million dollars, so it is hard to believe that there is not deep pocketed private investors at work.
Solutions: None.
Politrick: Leftist in most of their views as evidenced in their contributors (Lewis H. Lapham, Gore Vidal, Amy Goodman, Naomi Klein, and (formerly) Howard Zinn.)
Funding: The website claims to be solely non-profit based and not accepting funding from corporations or governments, their most recent fundraising campaign is approaching .5 million dollars, so it is hard to believe that there is not deep pocketed private investors at work.
Solutions: None.
Red Ice Creations
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Register
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Rense.com
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
RTR.Org
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Russia Today
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Socialist Worker
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Slate
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Sourcewatch/ Disinfopedia
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Ted Talks
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Telegraph
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Truthout
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
UNESCO
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Uruknet.info
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Venus Project/ Zietgiest movement
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Veterans Today
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
War Room
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
What Really Happened.com
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Wikileaks
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
Wired.com
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
World Net Daily
Нажмите здесь, чтобы отредактировать.
The Young Turks
The Young Turks
“The largest online news show in the world” is simply another corporate mouth, editing news and entertainment for you to have something to talk about, and not think about. Founded by host and executive producer Cenk Uygar in feb of 2002. Cenk is a regularly featured contributor to Satan’s own MSNBC, as well as the ‘liberal/progressive’ net rag The Huffington Post.
The Turks is filmed in a building owned by Mel Brooks with a monthly budget of $60,000, paid for from subscriptions and JewTube revenue sharing. TYT has no advertising budget: its fans (YOU), the TYT ‘Army’, are the dubious idiots that inadvertently act as its marketing staff via promotion by tweeting links or posting clips on your copyrighted and owned Facebook identity (Zucker sucker), and it works. Potential future marketing strategies include stapling a sign to your forehead and having you pay for it. Google approves of this strategy.
In fact Google (Facebook, Twitter, your soul, and your homepage if it isn’t Firefox) through its horns of plenty Youtube, Ustream, and Netflix is a major affiliate and funding contributor for the Turks, along with soon to be Googled up Go(Big)Daddy and Gamefly. Other affiliates include Virgin’s care-partner Squarefly, which given the long standing tradition of corporate prostitution will probably lose it’s cherry to Google sometime in the future as well.
The agenda seems pretty obvious; a touted leftist-liberal-progressive ‘cutting edge’ online poli-pop show aimed at cashing in on the Stewart/Colbert bandwagon, while simultaneously further pushing the future Gates/Google/Virgin WASP partnership.
With the help of their very good friends Brave New Films. TYT is clearly being positioned as a major player for corporate info dominance.
“Our sister network, What the Flick , on YouTube, TYT sports, TYT Moms, TYT food – Whatever matches our brand, and our brand is just: genuine, real and generally progressive.” …right.
“The largest online news show in the world” is simply another corporate mouth, editing news and entertainment for you to have something to talk about, and not think about. Founded by host and executive producer Cenk Uygar in feb of 2002. Cenk is a regularly featured contributor to Satan’s own MSNBC, as well as the ‘liberal/progressive’ net rag The Huffington Post.
The Turks is filmed in a building owned by Mel Brooks with a monthly budget of $60,000, paid for from subscriptions and JewTube revenue sharing. TYT has no advertising budget: its fans (YOU), the TYT ‘Army’, are the dubious idiots that inadvertently act as its marketing staff via promotion by tweeting links or posting clips on your copyrighted and owned Facebook identity (Zucker sucker), and it works. Potential future marketing strategies include stapling a sign to your forehead and having you pay for it. Google approves of this strategy.
In fact Google (Facebook, Twitter, your soul, and your homepage if it isn’t Firefox) through its horns of plenty Youtube, Ustream, and Netflix is a major affiliate and funding contributor for the Turks, along with soon to be Googled up Go(Big)Daddy and Gamefly. Other affiliates include Virgin’s care-partner Squarefly, which given the long standing tradition of corporate prostitution will probably lose it’s cherry to Google sometime in the future as well.
The agenda seems pretty obvious; a touted leftist-liberal-progressive ‘cutting edge’ online poli-pop show aimed at cashing in on the Stewart/Colbert bandwagon, while simultaneously further pushing the future Gates/Google/Virgin WASP partnership.
With the help of their very good friends Brave New Films. TYT is clearly being positioned as a major player for corporate info dominance.
“Our sister network, What the Flick , on YouTube, TYT sports, TYT Moms, TYT food – Whatever matches our brand, and our brand is just: genuine, real and generally progressive.” …right.