And now...the "week-after" pill? Saturday August 14, 2010 :The Food and Drug Administration approved a controversial new form of emergency contraception Friday that can prevent a pregnancy as many as five days after sex. The decision to allow the sale of the pill, which will be marketed under the brand name "ella," was welcomed by family-planning proponents as a crucial new option to prevent unwanted pregnancies. But critics condemned the decision, arguing that it was misleading to approve ella as a contraceptive because the drug could also be used to induce an abortion. Ella can cut the chances of becoming pregnant by about two-thirds for at least 120 hours after a contraceptive failure or unprotected sex, studies have shown. The only other emergency contraceptive on the market, the so-called morning-after pill sold as Plan B, is significantly less effective, becomes less effectual with each passing day and will not work after 72 hours. Supporters and opponents both said the decision marked the clearest evidence of a shift in the influence of political ideology at the FDA. The last time the FDA considered an emergency contraceptive -- making Plan B available without a prescription -- the decision was mired in controversy amid similar concerns voiced by antiabortion activists. After repeated delays, Plan B was approved for sale to women 17 and older without a prescription. Ella, which was approved in Europe last year and is available in at least 22 countries, was unanimously endorsed by an FDA advisory committee less than two months ago. Women will need a prescription but could keep a supply at home. Read more: http://blog.beliefnet.com/deaconsbench/2010/08/and-nowthe-week-after-pill.html#ixzz0xOEelzhd The toxic chemicals lobby 08/22/2010
From the NATURAL NEWS (NaturalNews) A diet including unlimited amounts of junk food can cause rats to become so addicted to the unhealthy diet that they will starve themselves rather than go back to eating healthy food, researchers have discovered. In a series of studies conducted over the course of three years and published in the journal Nature Neuroscience, Scripps Florida scientists Paul Johnson and Paul Kenny have shown that rats' response to unlimited junk food closely parallels well-known patterns of drug addiction -- even down to the changes in brain chemistry. "What we have are these core features of addiction, and these animals are hitting each one of these features," Kenny said. In their first study, the researchers fed rats on either a balanced diet or on the same diet plus unlimited access to junk foods purchased at a local supermarket, including processed meats and cakes. Within a short time period, the rats on the junk food diet began to eat compulsively and quickly became overweight. "They're taking in twice the amount of calories as the control rats," Kenny said. The researchers hypothesized that the rats were eating compulsively because, like drug addicts, they had become desensitized to smaller amounts and needed more and more for the same rush of pleasure. Many recreational drugs work by directly stimulating the brain's pleasure centers, particularly the dopamine receptor known as D2. Overstimulation of this receptor causes the body to start producing less dopamine, leading the addict to compensate by taking more of the drug. Since dopamine can also be released by pleasurable activities such as food or sex, Kenny and Johnson speculated that food addiction could develop in the same way. To test whether the rats had, in fact, become habituated to dopamine, the researchers took the rats from the first experiment and hooked their brains up to a device that would directly stimulate their D2 receptors when they ran on a wheel. Rats eating a junk food diet ran on the wheel significantly longer than rats fed a normal diet, suggesting that their receptors had indeed become desensitized. This "profound" desensitization occurred after just five days on a junk food diet. "They're not experiencing rewards the way they should," Kenny said. "When you experience that, one way of feeling better is to go back to the junk food." "They lose control. This is the hallmark of addiction." In another test of their addiction hypothesis, the researchers used a virus to block the D2 receptors in healthy rats. All those rats soon became compulsive eaters. "This is the most complete evidence to date that suggests obesity and drug addiction have common neurobiological underpinnings," Johnson said. Having established that the junk food rats had become addicted, Johnson and Kenny wanted to know how far this addiction would push them. So they took both junk-food addicted rats and rats that had not previously been exposed to such food, and exposed them to electrical shocks whenever they ate junk. Rats that had just been introduced to junk food quickly stopped eating it, while the addicted rats ignored the discomfort and kept eating. Perhaps the most shocking finding came when the researchers took away the addicted rats' access to junk food and started feeding them only healthy rat chow again -- the same diets the rats had eaten as pups. When junk food was no longer available, the rats simply refused to eat for two weeks. "They actually voluntarily starved themselves," Kenny said. "It's almost as if you break these things, it's very, very hard to go back to the way things were before. Their dietary preferences are dramatically shifted." The research strongly suggests that many modern humans also suffer from junk food addictions. Kenny notes, however, that unlike the rats, all humans with access to junk food do not become obese. He attributes this difference to the influence of health knowledge and social pressure in moderating people's natural eating habits. "The rats don't suffer from the same social pressures that we do," he said. The idea of junk food addiction is not a new one, and the dopamine-junk food connection was actually put forward by former FDA Commissioner David Kessler in his best-selling book, The End of Overeating. "Certainly, we see this addictive pattern in humans," nutritionist Sandy Livingston said. "They know they shouldn't overeat, but they do it anyway." Livingston expressed hope that better knowledge about the biochemical side of food addiction might result in lessened guilt and judgment surrounding obesity. "A lot of people blame themselves -- 'Why don't I have any willpower?'" she said. "Food can be highly addictive," said author and nutritional supplement producer Jordan Rubin. "When people describe overeating and weight loss as a battle, this is why." He called for more research into which individual components of junk food, such as MSG, might be behind its addictive effects. Obesity researcher Ralph DiLeone of Yale University noted that more research is needed into the long-term effects of such addiction, even if an animal later switches its diet and loses weight. READ MORE I usually never post old shit, because I like to keep it current, but couldn't resist posting this!!! Frankenfood to feed frankenhumans in 2050 08/17/2010
Technology needed to feed world in 2050: scientists Last Updated: Monday, August 16, 2010 | 3:26 PM ET CBC News Artificial meat, nanotechnology and genetic tools are among the "tools of science" that may be needed in the coming decades to help supply food to the world's population, scientists say. "The tools of science will be critical for bringing about food security and well-being for a global population of more than nine billion people in 2050 in the face of enormous technological, climatic and social challenges," predicted a paper published Monday by the Royal Society. The author, Philip Thornton of the International Livestock Research Institute in Nairobi, Kenya, looked into recent trends in livestock production and the future prospects of the industry as part of a series of 21 papers on the future of the global food and farming system. The reports by scientists around the world were published in the latest issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Thornton's report noted demand for meat, milk and other animal food products has been growing quickly with increasing urbanization and higher average incomes worldwide. Meanwhile, water and land for agriculture is growing increasingly scarce — a problem made worse by climate change and biofuel crops competing with regular food crops. The study predicted that will lead to much higher prices for meat, milk and eggs in coming decades. The growing of animal muscle in vats to produce artificial, cultured or "in- vitro" meat, is one possible way to help meet demand, it said. "From a technological point of view … its development is generally held to be perfectly feasible," the report said. It acknowledged the public may be slow to accept cultured meat. But such a product could be made healthier and more hygienic than "traditional" meat, the paper said, and it could also reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced by livestock. However, it estimated another decade of research is needed, and challenges such as cost and scale will need to be addressed before artificial meat hits grocery store shelves. Nanotechnology — which uses minute particles under 100 nanometres in size — could also help boost meat production, the report said. Nanosized sensors are being developed to monitor animals' health. Nanoparticles may be able to help target drugs and boost animals' nutrient uptake, the study said. Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/08/16/technology-food-security-artificial-meat.html#ixzz0wsAlw8XO Wifi sickness and electromagnetic radiation 08/17/2010
FROM ECANADA NOW Barrie Parrents Say Wi-Fi Can Make You SickPosted by Staff on Aug 17th, 2010 // No Comment Can Wi-Fi Make You Sick? Wireless Internet has become vastly popular, with networks appearing in restaurants, schools, and shopping malls. But new speculation has risen that says Wi-Fi may be making some people sick. Some in the scientific community suggest that electromagnetic radiation released from wireless routers could have a negative effect on health. That has lead to an outcry from parents who are against adding wireless networks to schools until further research is conducted. Last fall, parents in Barrie, Ontario had a failed attempt to ban Wi-Fi from schools because of health reasons. Now, the Ontario Education Minister is requesting information regarding the potential health concerns. The debate is at a height again, with parents, teachers, and administrators all wanting more information. Those in the scientific community are also debating the issue. While they agree that radiation is released, the debate centers on the amounts. Some say it is negligible and would fall well within the guidelines of various national health administrations. Others say that Wi-Fi has been known to cause health issues such as nausea and headaches. The World Health Organization says that Wi-Fi is safe as long as it falls under the exposure limits. Despite the findings by the World Health Organization and other scientific bodies, the debate over the potential risks of Wi-Fi is stirring the debate among the schools. While the parents in Barrie continue to demand the elimination of Wi-Fi, the school board has yet to do so. They are saying there isn’t sufficient evidence to warrant removing wireless networks from the schools. The issue in Barrie isn’t new. As far back as 2006, the safety of Wi-Fi has been called in to question. Lakewood University in Ontario banned campus wide Wi-Fi that year, and other schools have followed suit. The fears over Wi-Fi are likely to spark further research on the issue. READ MORE Have Your Say
Smart pill texts - time for your medicine Volunteers are being recruited to take standard versions of their heart pill fitted with a microchip. When swallowed, the chip send signals to a patch attached to the patient's shoulder. The patch can also send a text if the patient forgets to take the medication. The system, known as Raisin, also monitors heart activity and how well the patient is sleeping all of which may signal a deteriorating condition. It costs a few cents per pill and was initially tested in the US, where it lifted patients' consistency in taking their medication from 30 per cent to 80 per cent. If successful, the four-month test could lead to a year-long trial by Britain's health service. Nicholas Peters, professor of cardiology at Imperial College Healthcare, said the main aim was to get heart patients to stick to taking their pills. "It will encourage patients to take responsibility for their own health," he said. With a stricter medication regimen, it is hoped their health will improve and they will be less likely to be admitted to hospital in an emergency. The chips, developed by California-based company Proteus Biomedical, are tiny, digestible sensors made from food ingredients. Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/smart-pill-texts-time-for-your-medicine/story-e6frfro0-1225905939359#ixzz0wkqCudDp Raids on organic food stores commence in US 08/15/2010
If you are wondering why the reporter is being so cordial and supportive its because its on Russia Today, who has an interest in stirring up American unrest, and are willing to provide people ample reason to do so day in and day out, and indeed their concerns are justified, however the masters of this house realize that no one is organized who shouldn't be, the majority of the discontented and indignant are falling for the instruction of their plants be they Peter Joseph (who controls the sympathetic will unrealistic promises of utopia) or Alex Jones (controlling the people with guns and fear of dystopia). They know that any resistance outside these control ops will be sloppy and reactionary and thus easily quelled, and simply provide more unjust cause for more nation wide crackdowns (with Canada firmly tethered behind). You have been warned thoroughly. |





RSS Feed