Nathan Hominid

March 6th 2010

In light of our unconscious will to catastrophe of epic proportions, I have taken the liberty to clarify what I mean by the 'Epochalypse' in a dramatic way. I have done this in order to elicit uncontrollable emotional responses in the reader, in addition to delivering its epistemological purpose which no one gives a shit about, but is nonetheless required to keep academics confused while sounding pretentious and smarter then I actually am. This will be laid out in an upcoming short shockumentary adorned with the cosmic beats of Sir Archie Cooper that will cause your cerebrum to spontaneously combust.

It will be released in April 2010.

You likely have been blessed with the notion of impending doom to take place in late 2012, it carries your moments of self-loathing when you long for some collective misery to drown out your own and make you feel better.

I unknowingly was not the first to use the word, although the zeitgeist prevailed and zapped it into my head when I was trying to come up with a cheeky title for this twoof bomb, it sounds cool, and is not as depressing as the reality of the situation would have it and is thus 'acceptable' to the philosophically bankrupt retards and halfwits who dominate our lives.

For those of you who were hoping to not be burdened with the task of thinking ahead, and having a good excuse to not go to work on December 22nd 2012, you will suffer an immense disappointment when you awake yet again into the same tried and true mental enslavement; the same spiritual hell you are accustomed to, at which point you will suddenly go (even more) insane. Conveniently, most wont know it.

What will come to pass is the end of an epoch. A period of time characterized by a fine blend of freedumb, wasted prosperity, and notions of impending doom, will finally be put to rest and we will have no more excuses to live in fear. Concurrently (and tragically) our ability to influence the world in any meaningful way whatsoever will also have diminished entirely, as by that time the oppressive apparatus will have been fully assembled.

Right now you have the opportunity to do so. You have everything at your disposal right now that would enable you to assist dismantling the unjust hegemonic web of shit and lies that envelops you, chizzle by chizzle smash by smash, you very well could reclaim your fate. You have at this point in time, one last chance to take action and smash the lies for which there is no rational purpose other than their adherence to the foundation of lies that preceded them, and those that preceded them, and so on. I am confident you wont.

This foundation (this fundamental unbalanced belief that underlies our current global mode of being) is the pyramid, and the notion of hierarchy, if not rectified prior to this time, will damn us to suffer under its oppressive weight indefinitely.

In April 2010 Archie Cooper and Nathan Hominid, will set the record straight. One last attempt to lay the philosophical foundations for a refined and meaningful physical, spiritual, emotional and mental existence will be turned loose on the zeitgeist of information and it will be ignored, censored, and missed by billions while having no significant impact whatsoever.

This is only part one of a 7 part series available on youtube.

United we stand indeed. However King tuts DNA has recently been tested, researchers persist with their depiction of him as some kind of albino alien. So its a good time to reiterate the facts...

Visit dailymail (pukes) for the contemporary version


French researchers say they didn't want to... get this "assign him a skin color" as it cant be proven!!!!

The first 2 hrs are very informative, but the rest well... he blows the whole thing!!!!

You, like many others. likely habitually ignore the part of your news feed cluttered with alternative media trash and unconventional nutty conspiracy links proclaiming to seek the truth. Like many, you may have been forced to endure this slew of devious information when merely attempting to see how many ways your friends can say I am a contentedly ostracized ignoramus in 140 or 420 characters or less. If you have these problems, you can rest assured that you are not alone!!!

Thankfully, curiousity isnt what actually makes us human!!! Nope!!! Settling for an endless succession of the lesser of two evils and taking orders is!!!! YIP!!! Anyone who condemns a person for exploring an unpopular issue (no matter how plausible it may be) is justified, they should be widely embraced and be rewarded with economic viability, and easy friends that wont do crazy embarrassing shit. People should be harshly criticized, reprimanded and deemed "insane" for even considering the notion that the people who own everything (and are far better networked than they) would attempt to preserve their power by directly conspiring to maintain it... at best. I mean if you think that like WTF is wrong with you. Geezzzzzzzzzzzzz guy. I am trying to look concerned here.

These raging paranoiacs probably come off as quite course, obsessive and defensive. They often devolve quickly into name calling in conversation and immediately assume that everyone who doesn’t agree with them is in some way involved with the grand conspiracy that holds them in place. They were likely quite innocent when they first began their quest, they simply wanted to know more then what their schools and universities had taught them and more than where their good will had lead them. After leaving these institutions unfulfilled, they slowly were enticed to explore other theories which were more explanatory of why things were so fucked up in ways the others just ... werent. In the process of accumulating and circulating this information, they were called all sorts of names which in turn made them want to know more, and the prize all the more alluring... but the one that must have stung the most was being called "Crazy", for some reason that always seemed to stick...

The stigma of mental illness goes back, back and beyond the days of bedlam, in which insanity was equated with spiritual possession, and the act of not conforming to society was deemed cynical (the life of the dog), abrasive, malcontent, unjustifiably paranoid and a threat to the social order (corruption). This same attitude toward the “possessed” has made its way into the modern age in more elaborate forms. The secular benefited by having any ideas which ran counter to its system stigmatized by this subtle religious connotation. People who spoke their minds, and warned of the realities of the system were thought too “preachy” they were thought to be religious followers, if only to an idea. After being lambasted with empty criticisms and name calling throughout the process of trying to do something honest and sincere for humanity, they slowly eroded in character. Incrementally these people became frustrated with those who would not listen, they began losing their patience, and in the same manner as they railed against the system, they began rail against those who would not listen, they were forced to see themselves as necessarily superior, they began to rationalize their curiosity as being the only thing that was in fact sane, and thus for the sake of their own tranquility deemed the society of which they were apart as quite appropriatley insane.

In defense of the attacks they stopped asking questions, no longer felt the need to pussyfoot around the issues and open themselves up to the intellectual misfortune of others, and instead began speaking in absolute terms as they knew it couldn’t be met with much worse. They did it boisterously and belligerently, they relentlessly shat on the naive hopes and dreams of over-the-counter-cultural rebels in hopes of showing them how they too were mislead with their banners, peaceful protest, good music and rebellious apparel which with they pathetically sought to dismantle the towering tyranny that struck them down harder each time to the gutwrenching screams of people being bombed in the safe distance. They even then began to tire of showing these groups how their efforts were in vain.... they tired, and thirsted for more , and more and more and more, until they ultimatley became miserable, isolated, if not ruthless.

They became hateful of the stubbornness that stood between them and the collective equanimity of humankind. We went out on a whim, and didnt know how to swim. Anger consumed them, and they then could no longer hide from the criticism of being unhappy, cynical and negative minded, as they became that very person. And so was the success of the synopticon, it turned a societies finest people of virtue, into those to be rejected and feared. They convinced the people, in all of their brilliance, that we should not fear the system, but those who sought to correct it. And so their fate was written, and so their fate was done, but they were just light anyway. From the sun, sun, sun.

-Human

I recently commited facebook suicide, only to become a totally isolated recluse, borderline weirdo. I was doing ok with the chainsmoking fuck the world, isolationist/ eccentric artisian who drives an SUV bit, but I found myself becoming self-centerdly toxic, elitist, and essentially that which I so vehemently despise. My motives for abandoning the service was to escape its oppressive grip, to free myself from the controlled mediums which so incrementally are leading us to the slaughterhouse. The fact that leaving the service could have such an impact is an indication of the strength of this grip it has over us all.  I became frustrated with peoples utter complacency with the increasingly corporatized and dehumanized version of the service which most appeared to accept without criticism other then a witty status diatribe here and there (of which I am typically the supplier) or a good ol redundant facebook group to vainly protest.... facebook. I became frustrated and increasingly cynical (virtuous)  that while we circulated links, and exhanged our insights in this seemingly free virtual playground, that we were at the same time caught in the grips of infantilism, that we were all little children merely amusing ourselves in big brothers toyshop, monitered around the clock by CCTV. Now that facebook has almost achieved its goal of getting us comfortable with complete disclosure in a contentedly nuerotic self-censoring society on a medium that is now openly monitered by the authorities to track political (irrational) dissent, I figure my boycott is utterly meaningless, considering the end has already came and passed.

In the process of making this statement I abandoned my humans, those cellular components of the global mind with which I once exchanged impulses and signals of sublevel importance. So I have reactivated my facebook, to keep in touch with my real friends, so not to lose sight of the shore, should my ship get sunk...

In short I am merely back for tactical purposes.

I do not kid myself with regards to its applicability as a tool for social activism, as I have explained before it is the exact opposite.

This just in 44% of Americans would like Bush back... and 44% of Americans are fucking borderline retards who are never, ever ever ever going to figure out whats actually going on...

By Nathan Human

Every where you go you here the same old line... "too big to fail" they say, when talking about the American (!) dominated (private operated) global financial system.

Too big to fail they say when talking about Americas imperialist might ...

Too big to fail they say when reminding us of Obamas charistma, his global acclaim and the endurance of his puppeteers.

Too big to fail they say are the insatiable obeasts who's self hate fuels the profit driven medical industry, and the aesthethically devoid existence of mongoloid human beings... Too big to fail they say when talking about big macs, fat stacks, loaded gats and superized 50 inch plasma TV flats... Too big to fail they say, when talking about the resolve of the American people, the dissolve of the American sheeple and the perseverance with which they overcome whatever contrived roadblock and/or fictitious organization (or critical thought) lies between them and the unending task of accumulating goods to carry with them to the afterlife after exhausting their lives in jobs they protested for but hate...

Now we hear that Obamas popularity is plummeting? OH DEAR GOD!!! WHAT A SHOCKER!!! THIS MUST MEAN THAT... PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP... THAT THE REAL REVOLUTION IS COMING... THAT PEOPLE ARE PIERCING THROUGH THE POLITICAL FASCADE IN SEARCH OF SOMETHING MORE THAN JUST A SYMBOLIC FIGUREHEAD OR MAYBE...

IT IS PART OF THE PROGRAM.

Obamas notoriety at a new high
Why is Obamas popularity plummeting? Who is telling us his popularity is dropping? What would motivate people to change their views so drastically? Is it because people are starting to see through the omnipresent deceptions of politics and are ready to actually embrace a new level of civilization, and new and improved (evolved) ways of thinking? Or is it that the majority of these people are motivated by base level selfish emotions (fear, greed, anger) and are actually just too dumb to see through the tricks used in leading questionnaires used by gallop polls, much less EVER applying their knowledge of the clandestine powers that be in full and in fairness. The people who are telling you that his popularity is plummeting (ZIOVISION) are the same people who are NOT telling you that the world is run by a handful of people who are out to secure their own best interest nor are they assisting the resistance to this in any way thats beyond trivial or beyond mere entertainment. They are the same people who told you to vote for him (through a machine made in Israel). Secondly, its politics, either you say fuck corporate spun politics or you forever cling to the false sense of 'hope' that you have been unconsiously conditioned to conjure up in times of need, and keep criticizing frontmen for not getting shot so that you dont have to pay taxes and intrest to private lenders. Keep pretending that the next one will be better and that voting machines made in Israel will permit you to effectively do so. IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT ALEX JONES SAYS ABOUT THE OBAMA DECEPTION, BE SURE TO APPLY THAT SAME REASONING TO EVERY OTHER PATSI THEY THROW YOUR WAY ESPECIALLY IF ALEX JONES RECOMMENDS THEM!!! In fact ask yourself why a person who is so outspoken in their condemnation of the mainstream media would selectively and uncritically endorse their viewpoint at times... Either you think they are full of shit or you dont, there is no two ways about it Alex, unless your full of shit then anything is possible!!!!

The same people who control the phoney polls are the same people who control the media. THEY WANT Obama to appear unpopular, this method of control implies that the majority of Americans have yet to transcend the hegelian dialectic which it would appear keeps reproducing itself in more sophisticated forms. Obamas downfall is being engineered because they need a society divided right down the middle. Once he starts going below 40, they will bring it up again, whilst offering another solution, because there always needs to be a dead heat to the finish, because like sports, even though we know its fake, we still feel inclined to cheer for the puppet that we identify with whether it be Obama, McCain or the Ron Paul cultus, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME, ANYONE TELLING YOU OTHERWISE WILL ASK YOU FOR MONEY SOON THEREAFTER. I GARAN-FKN-TEE IT.

Hope has been hijacked yet again and this time its being towed by the diminishing middle class who could give a fuck about anything but the profit margins of their own investments. We should not have hope that those who created the problems will remedy them (that an Obama replacement will yield anything different), this is to merely HOPE to buy more time before shit inevitably and ever so incrementally hits the fan in full fledged 3D, rather we should hope that people remember WHO they are, and come to harness their own personal power. I MEANT TO SAY REMEMBER WHAT THEY ARE. The "who" is a word deeply woven into the selfish capitalist framework, in that to say "who" am I, assumes that "I" is somehow beyond "what"... did you get that? If not who (WHAT) gives a piping hot fuck anyways!

We should hope that we can collectively gaze into the night sky and in unison revel in the mystery of what we do not know... We should only exhaust our resolve on the hopes that they (the masses) will come to KNOW what they do not know, and in the process come to know the most fundamental of all things that they KNOW nothing. That they, with their day jobs, new car, new cell phone applications, rings of friends, likes and dislikes, their looks and so on are all cultural fabrications that have absolutley nothing to do with our true destiny within the cosmos. Hopefully we can come to see that we are an inconstant cellular mass, changing and expanding like the universe... That we can never anchor ourselves in some idea, or we left behind in the endless expansiveness of the universe... this is reality.

At first glance the untrained eye would presume that because the hope Obama inspired has not been matched in any practical respect, that our disdain for this politician will amount to anything more than the same old shit. Everyone is acting so suprised that a politician didnt do what they said they would, without giving second thought to the fact that he is a fabrication, that the media who is telling you his popularity is plummeting is apart of that fabrication, and that Obama taking the fall and prompting the dissolution of the US is exactley what they are hoping for. You dont pay them to make decisions, you pay them to lie. Why is it that people who know politics is a sham are persistently (perhaps only unconsiously) swayed by the medias bullshit polls? For example in the instance of Alex Jones, should he not be impartial to the fact that Obamas popularity being on the decline (considering his alleged towering over the phony left/right paradigm)? Of course he should. He doesnt because he is a faking, bullshit making, money taking, mind raping infowhoring shill who fabricates grand delusions and knits them to things in the real world to pollute grass roots initiatives and in effect fuel the hegelian dialectic he professes to condemn while practicing his own method of survivalism in building his nest egg off the backs of his viewers he would surely meet with a shotgun from the door of his bunker when his post-apocalyptic fantasy takes shape...


What will happen?
Here is what will happen, people are going to criticize Obama for a multitude of reasons ranging from the fact that he is black to the fact that he is a puppet for the global elite and blah blah... other people will counter and say they are doing this mainly because he is black (which many are... no I am serious its hardly moitivated by "something greater" and the only thing that resembles 1776 is the fact that a black dude is at the center of the contraversy, something most Americans are accustomed to condemning). All of the enlightened criticisms of Obama will be swept up with all these bullshit criticisms (like hes a muslim, I mean seriously, what if he was, what if he fucking was... what does that say about the status of the separation of church and state in America and blah blah blah I like talking to myself). When the Obamanites respond (note I used Obama-NITE, not Obama-NOID, as conservatives do; to conflate it with negroid/ android/ mongoloid  and not " ite" like luddite or even .... semite etc) they will reject all of the enlightened criticisms of Obama under the suspicion that they may be racist, then the enlightened ones will say oh "their they go playing the racist card those stupid sheep", and then the Obamanites will act suprised to a point in which the enlightened (pseudo enlightened) actually start to hate them, and after they lash out in anger the Obamanites will call them hate filled racists, many of the enlightened then (for lack of easier option) will effectively BECOME hatefilled racists, never understanding the implications of their calling people "bitch sheep" and its Zionaziesque level of thinking. Now dont get me wrong, when one reaches a certain level of understanding the corruption which knits the big lie, its a coping mechanism to make fun of the people who think you are crazy for questioning the world around you, nonetheless it is at a lower level of cognition then empathizing with their buttfuck idiocy and the environment which reared it.

If America goes to the polls again with that same old rekindled sense of hope that has been exploited countless times before, Fadsmashers is going to quit, and because I know they will, I am already planning my extended vacation. The profound self-deception required to even entertain the notion that you are going to get ANYTHING worthwhile via the long since sold out political system and the act of voting is probably a good idea, because the fact is a people who are incapable of realizing the magnitude of deception in the modern day, would surely be incapable of governing themselves. Call it what you will... Zionaziesque thinking perhaps, but for all practical purposes I have lost faith in those that have blind faith and perhaps its our dependence on their awakening is exactley what the oligarchs want...

So when you hear that Obamas popularity is slipping, remember how its just another level of the game...

- Human December 2nd 2009
The following is a response I received from a fellow smasher, I found it to be an insightful exchange as much as we disagree about some of the details. His comments are unformated whereas mine are bolded (not that this means my comments are any bolder!!!). This wasnt the actual dialogue but their email with my added comments as well as an email response sent to them by me.

-Nhuman wrote
Hey man, I have been meaning to get back to ya, pardon the delay, just been uber busy with a whole bunch of shit, as far as the whole climate discourse I am not entirely sure how it will play out or what the implications are of its agreements for the global peasantry, although you seem to be onto something! Honestly the climate emails thing wont get much coverage, asides from a few blurbs in the back pages of major periodicals, it likely wont put a dent in the process. They want to take down the USA, any info that fuels their phony debates (i.e. climate change) are a good thing. Its like the god debate, with people channeling all their energy into either defending or challenging something which may not even exist, just another human construct directing peoples attention away from the cabals that be runnin this show. So long as the debate isnt on suppressed tech, nor real environmental issues, or whos in charge they are quite content with anything that keeps people divided.

Truthtweaker wrote:
I have to disagree with you. They don't want to take down the U.S.A., they've (City of London Corporation i.e. THE Bankers = Hedge Funds) have owned the U.S.A. via the District of Columbia for well over 100 years.  Nor do I think they want to 'equalize' wealth as is described in the Cop Treaty.  To do so would undermine a lot of cozy cash cow day-traders.  What they do want to do is create more scarcity, and more flux.  By those two means they can acquire more Capital, ensure less risk for themselves, and consolidate power.  What it boils down to in the End is that these people (lets call them ‘Them’...awe hell here they are: Kissinger, Volcker, Maurice Strong, Gyllenhammar, Viscount Davignon, Rockefeller, Gianni Agnelli, Cisneros, Jacob and Evelyn Rothschild, Desmarais & Sons, George Shultz, Otto Habsburg, Philip Mountbatten, Brzezinski).  These people DO believe they are working for the best interests of humanity, and the world as a whole.  Now I am in no way defending them by this next statement, but when you're born into the world these people are, and you operate at the level they do, you often miss what the effects of the decisions you make have on the ground level.  Like them I believe the ends do justify the means, but I also believe they're doing it wrong. 

I completely disagree with the concept of the ends justifying the means, for the simple fact that there is no known end".  We can assume that those in power actually have the end of world peace in mind, and on top of that we can presume that world peace is obtainable through coercive means. The logic of the matter dictates that peace cannot be brought through force; you cannot FORCE people to agree, for at some point inevitably they will resist.

Municipal power, not global power will be key to humanities best interests in the future.  These men are working towards a dream, but have failed to acknowledge that that dream is outdated, just as they themselves have become.  We no longer require a Saturnian figurehead to guide our actions, or engineer a societal structure geared towards that dream of 'peace', while placating to the lowest common denominator to ensure we must.  This will in the end prove a catastrophic failure on their parts.  By eliminating ambition, pride, envy, want, and need, you may serve to suppress greed, but you suppress what truly makes us human, and gives us impetus for evolution.  Namely conflict.  Conflict is necessary, without it we will wither, just as we currently are in the western world.  When all happiness is satisfied, when all angst tranquilized, when all pain is neutralized we cease to learn, we become jaded, bored, apathetic, useless. 


There is no need to eliminate these emotional traits. We should take pride in others. We should envy the unknown, we should want and need knowledge, but we needn’t apply these to one another. These are TRUE post-human emotional states. In the spirit of Moses(!), though shall not covet... Conflict is as necessary as cooperation. Although countries may go to war, it would not have been possible without first cooperating. Some of the most profound scientific gains pondered and conjured throughout history have been made by individuals who have a passion for the arts, not envy for others. Look what happened to Adolf Hitler. We presume that its competition that gave us this standard of living we enjoy, however it is conflict which has stunted that standard of living. Every luxury we have reaped is owed to cooperation battling the adversity of the free market. And should we feel the need to resist something, should we feel the need to compete, we can compete with the stars, the comets on route to earth; we can compete with the vastness of space. This is life’s only enemy, and at the same time its mother.  

Their great legacy is not the utopia they believe will come about through all this strife, not the great balancing, a satiated placating of mans baser instincts, and controlled funnelling of aggression in meaningless wars in order to avert more serious catastrophes.  Their great legacy is the Simpsons, fox news, codex alimentarius, and people too blind dumb, numb, and without cum to unfuck themselves.

To presume that they are trying to avert more serious wars by prolonging the less damaging military industrial complex is the consequence of neo-Freudian/ bio-reductionist conditioning. There is no NEED to know a war is going on, or to cheer for a side, there is no need (particularly in light of newly developed virtual experiences) for catharsis to be enacted in this way through war. We are omnivores, not carnivores. Lions may feel an inclination to sink their teeth into something running, we however do not feel this urge.

They don't see that though.  They see the goal: World Peace.  And for that goal they must first reduce the world’s population by any means necessary (in order to ensure a copacetic standard of living for all i.e. just above enough)... overlooking the fact that by increasing the standard of living in an area it's proven within two generations to begin drastically decreasing the population.  Hence how this new 'apology tax' in the Cop treaty could be beneficial, but wasn't put there to this end, and won't function towards that goal. 

It is only assumed that they aspire to "world peace", yet any world peace earned through war will be ultimately suppressing and thus not actually peaceful.

Stealing from one poor fuck, and giving it to another poor fuck leaves you with two poorer fucks (which is the goal), except the former has the ability to garner more for both, instead of providing the later with the opportunity to do the same (This oversight might be a slim chance for revolution if people don't simply shudder, bitch, and then turn on the TV.) 

That money isn't going to the latter though; it's going to his boss.  Who in turn uses it to frantically attempt to buy more IMF bucks to bail his sorry ass out for crooking the original transaction that wound his people into debt to begin with? And if they ever get bailed out?  War is always there to make new losers in the race for more scarcity. 
They already own it all, they just want everything to be balanced in a controlled flux, organized under one overruling system that pumps the blood necessary for the appendage systems (the flux=multiple currencies, and geo-political-corporate zones/designations/persons).  They see this convoluted mess as a necessary illusion for their free-range people farms.  Never once thinking (as they're too blinded by the view they have to) that perhaps humanity cannot be balanced, cannot be 'perfect', or that perhaps it already in its own way is, or was before their tampering. That our beauty lies in our frailty, in our small prefrontal lobes, and overly large adrenal glands. That not ONE thing is beautiful, but ALL things. That pain is a teacher. That there is more than ONE truth, way, and that freedom is something that's acknowledged, inherent, not earned, or with-held.  Nature will find a way, either by giving them what they want in the form of a few left-over post-planned-catastrophe docile, impotent, lemmings soon to be replaced by a more aggressive, adaptable species, or by humanities baser instincts snapping to the surface and having one of us push that big red button to end it all. 

They won a long time ago, officially when they created DC.  Since then it's been testing, and restructuring.  I'm sorry to be so defeatist, but given how humanity is currently, compared to how it was prior to the first WW, for the most part, aside from the few thousand aberrations like ourselves.  It's just a matter of time before it all ends, or it's all Disney.  Our enemy Nathan is Omniscient, Omnipresent, and Omnipotent.  Our enemy controls currency.  Stopping currency won't stop them at this point.  They still have nukes, and nanotechnology.  No one's going to drop out, no one's going to say stop, and be heard. 

I just wish I wasn't one of the few who wanted to know enough to care, only to find out I shouldn't, and still care after the fact. 

We are at a point now where we can control our own evolution (and probably well beyond that as we approach the AI singularity). I do believe that it is our destiny to unify, it seems so intuitive as this is how natural processes arrange themselves. When a system becomes too complex an overarching order manifests to control and regulate it. BUT. The queen ant is ideally in service to the workers, not the other way around. We need a new world order, but not one plagued with greed and corruption, and I don’t believe that a true unified globe could establish itself with these primitive human motivations present, there will always be conflict so long as this is the method we use to bring peace.

I couldn't agree with you more, especially your point about the Queen Ant, that's what I was referring to when I stated Municipal Power, not Global power will be key to our future.  To elaborate, if we we're to reverse the pyramid as it stands currently, and have a unified Global Government at the base, and accord it the power to regulate trade etc, but limit its power to the weakest in our structure, following it with regionalized geo-cultural-environmental zones, and then Apexing our pyramid with municipal power we'd have a solid cooperative foundation that ensured communities could choose to regulate themselves how they saw fit within a global family.  A resource based economy would be ideal; a defense structure similar to what Switzerland currently possesses would provide optimum self-sufficient security.  The problem with this system lies in one municipality deciding "I'm going to nuke this fuck, and take his land because God told me it's mine."  Until our species can evolve beyond dogma, we'll never unify.  I don't see that happening anytime soon.  It's not that by having 'these', or 'those' particular things present, or eliminated that we will overcome our problems as a species.  Those are symptoms, and the solutions do not eliminate the problems.  The problem is human nature.  Let me know if you have a cure for fear, for wilful ignorance, for psychoses.  We're a predatory breed, and the majority of us would prefer a comfortable lie, over an uncomfortable truth.  Cure that, and you can save this ball of dirt. 

November 30th 2009

(Above) Michio Kaku reiterates the Kardashev scale

-Earth, Star System
By Nathan Human

Occasionally we get so wound up in the mundane world of human affairs that we forget our context, even the most philosophically occupied among us still succomb to the fabrications of the sensory.

A few points of significance

Right NOW we are on what we call  a "rock" that is but one in a series of rocks spinning around other rocks which themselves are traversing through what appears to be unending abyss of "blackness" at speeds that cannot be comprehended by our ground bound organic mass. I personally have no idea as to what is going on here, quite frankly "I" dont know enough about the "I" to trust in its curiosity, much less its findings...

I am a collection of cells that would appear to be typing words on a screen that will eventually be read by the two other sacks of cells known as my "readers".

The fact that this isnt on the news, and that we have become so accustomed and exhausted of musing over our own existence is WHY the world is plagued by so many inequities. You really have to think about this picture, and not in a religous or spiritual way (as the notion of spirit is equally subjective). Actually dont think about it, visualize it. Visualize your place in that which you refer to be the universe. Dont just think about it as you and the stars, and all that hollywood nonsense that we have been conditioned to associate the contemplation of our existence with, really think about abrasive reality of what is really fucking happening RIGHT NOW. There is no stars, there is balls of fuel and raging infernos. There is no "you" there is the conversation between organ systems in a language you necessarily dont understand while allowing you to make your own. If everyone were to truly visualize their place in the cosmos, the world would be a more harmonious place. A persons understanding of the world, its complexity and sophistication is commensurate to their ability to percieve the context of their existence, their awareness of injustice and how easily they can be controlled.

YOU ARE HERE NOW. LIVING. BREATHING. YOUR EYES ARE WET. YOU DONT NOW WHY. SOON YOU WILL BE FRAIL. SOON YOU WILL BE DUST. THIS IS IMPORTANT.

It is a thought that can and should be evoked in our darkest, and more importantly our brightest hours. No matter how high a podium a human being stands on, that podium is indefinitely pegged into the foundation of the earth. So why then do we fight? Why then do we bother resisting corrupt governments and corporations? What is it in us that motivates us to challenge hegemony? It isnt a desire to be free, rather it is our inclination to homeostasis, balance, and justice.

I am not optimistic, nor is this a state that I feel should be aspired to. Optimism is preyed upon by opportunistic people, and the bulk of the former is naive and delusional anyway. I do believe however as I always have that transhumanism and "type 1 civilizations" are not something we should fear (i.e. planetary rule) but in fact aspire to... homeostatically. Michio Kaku explains the type one civilization as one which has mastered their environment, and shifted to a global political paradigm from a regional one. Unlike Michio Kaku (reknown scientist), I dont believe that we must blindly subscribe to any old "planetary civilization model" simply because its the one being offered, and because its our "destiny". If this world government that Kaku is trying to sell is so important to ensuring our survival, than it shouldnt require the many deceptions it has to be actualized (i.e. money, global warming, terrorism). If this truth Kaku entertains is so critical, then I am sure he would sooner it be achieved through diplomatic and as enlightened a means as possible, discluding the free for all of multinationals, oligarchs and banking cartels that would fashion this concentration of power with the same tools they used to chizzle out soveriegn dictatorships that spawned them. Yet he doesn't. He calls anyone who disagrees with G20 hegemony "terrorists", and anyone who is skeptical as ridden with fear (something he views in the negative except when he is fueling the fear for 2012).

Kakus unified civilization cannot arise using fear to coax people into buying into it, people have to first comprehend its importance, and not be tricked into the state of 'technopoly' in which we simply passively accept technology without considering the corrupt context from which it emerged. How can we ensure the integrity of this upcoming global society which will dictate our destiny as a species hereafter if we cannot even minimize corruption on a regional scale.

Can we at the same time have our motives for unification be ridden with fear while attempting to transcend the "problem> fear > solution" level of consiousness so pervasively used in nation building? If fear is what knitted the fabric of regional tyranny that blankets the sleeping world, what should we expect from a global patchwork utilizing the same seamstress? Its like the "green economy" movement and trying to mandate higher conscious behaviours (awareness of ones environment) using the lowest level of consciousness as a motivator (i.e. greed, money).

Freedom in the truest sense of the word entails universal bastardization. It entails a functionless excess, an unpredictable, chaotic, and subatomically boun disorder. In fact nothing is free, everything is sandwiched between something else. Freedom is an illusion. Freedom in its realist form is a nightmare, and is physically impossible.

The fact is freedom is unattainable, whereas Justice and balance are. Therefore I am changing the "freedumb movement" to the "justice movement". To the avail of no one, but these zeros and ones and zeros and ones....

Kaku uses fear to warrant the NWO, the same tactic practiced by the terrorists he claims "hate our tolerance". Like most scientists woven into the academic complex he is a pragmatic genius who is fundamentally and philosophically wrong.

I only recently watched this movie (Religulous 2008, a documentary by Bill Maher) after a family member had rented it, typically I would have avoided it all together because I think Bill Maher is a loudmouth Zionist asshole, who fronts as a progressive and yatta yatta yatta all the rest. However now I have yet another example of his stealthy pro-war shillary. Here is the plot of the documentary.

(checkmarks note disagreement)

1) To show how the bulk of religious beliefs are hogwash (✓)
2) To show how religion makes people do crazy shit (✓)
3) To show how anyone who disagrees with the creation of Israel is completely insane (X)

So how is it that Zionist Bill Maher (and anyone who endorses Israel) is more deluded then the religious? Well... simply, because Zionism is based on a religious/ political idea!

It’s quite simple. Israel has nuclear weapons; they are used as a NATO proxy to bring "democracy" to the Middle East (i.e. widespread death and destruction, hegemony, monetary enslavement and the illusion of choice).

Israel wanted a war with Iraq, and Afghanistan, as they want a war with Iran, Lebanon (in progress), Palestine, Syria, Egypt and anyone else in the region who hasn’t bowed down to global Zionist hegemony.

If you support Israel you support war (period). Anyone who criticizes the Iraq war, yet supports Israel is either mistaken or just pretending. There are no two ways about it. For example: Some indignant misguided Jewish nunce had the audacity to hound me the other day for hoisting a sign that Bush was a Zionist patsy, while his own sign critiqued the Bush administration for war crimes. He went out of his way to spend the whole protest drawing even more attention to me by making a sign that said "don’t listen to this guy". Sure enough his attempt at provocation was a complete failure because he merely drew more attention to my sign (thanks school boy!). Regardless even though he had a sign protesting Bush, his fundamental beliefs did more to justify that war than his feeble mind will permit him to understand.

Anyways I digress, the point is Bill Maher’s whole purpose in this documentary was to reinforce the idea that Zionism is good, while concealing it with his criticism of religion... let me explain it in point form.

• He spends the first hour of the shitumentary visiting miscellaneous Christian churches, even getting booted out of the Vatican to appear all the more legitimate. He amuses himself at how much smarter he is than the average fox news viewer and their televangelical philosophy (wow Bill, we are really impressed). In doing so he accurately critiques the market of religious ideas and foolery, and basically performs a comedic/ agnostic version of a Richard Dawkins 2 hr special (minus the equally deluded atheism). Fair enough. He gives all of these people ample time to speak, and then ridicules every ridiculous belief they utter and proceeds to relish in this accomplishment several times. CONGRATULATIONS BILL YOU RAGING ZIOLLECTUAL YOU... HOW ORIGINAL TOO!!!
• Then he goes and speaks with an Orthodox Rabbi who rejects the idea of Israel and the unnecessary havoc it has wreaked (who Bill conveniently associates with holocaust denial/ "revisionism"). While the Rabbi is trying to explain why he disagrees with Israel (and it should be noted he is the most logical of all in the documentary), Bill makes a habit of routinely interrupting him and twisting the rabbis every word, he gets frustrated (as scripted) and storms out of the meeting (hypocritically, after having been thrown out of numerous meetings with Christians prior in the film for his cheap shot humour). NOTE: He did not get up and leave willingly ONCE in ALL the interviews he conducted in the film, EXCEPT for the one with the rabbi who disagreed with the POLITICAL/ RELIGOUS ideology of Zionism!!! HE WAS HOPING PEOPLE WOULDNT NOTE THE BLATANT CONTRADICTION!!! I DID BITCH!
• Then after proving that he wasn’t 'just' out to get Muslims, (i.e. attacking Christianity for an hr) he moves on to Islam, in which he analyzes in political, terms (i.e. not religious terms). I say again, he critiques the RELIGOUS beliefs of Christians, and spends the rest of the movie defending Zionism, and MOSTLY focusing on the POLITICS of Islam, and only the radical stuff of course. When he asked a Muslim cleric about the violence and radicalism of Islam, the Cleric responded “that this is merely the consequence of politics) Bill then dodges this statement by playing dumb, and proceeds to pester the cleric about other trivial nuances of the religion.
• At the end of the movie he pretends to be an objective agnostic again, by claiming that his only purpose with the film was to promote doubt and scepticism. After endorsing the religiously substantiated/ political ideology of Zionism and debunking FUNDAMENTALIST forms of all religion, he extrapolates his critique to the teachings of all religions in GENERAL! While not going anywhere near Buddhism because they just mediate anyways... He takes the most extreme examples of all religions, and uses them to reject those religions in their entirety altogether.

Now I am not religious, but I am moral, I follow what could be viewed as the scientific equivalent of the golden rule (i.e. the utilitarian code). That basically we should do unto others as we would like them to do unto us, and make an effort to make the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people in any situation. Additionally insofar as I realize humanity does not need religion, and that it is a tool of social control ecploited to wage resource wars, I have met many religious people who are VERY GOOD CARING PEOPLE. Bill Maher’s critique of religion is elementary, illogical easily refuted, while his defense of Zionism is hypocritical and naive, if not intentional as is the case will most Ziowhores.

DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS PIECE OF SHIT NWO PROPAGANDA FILM.