The following article claims that the "taliban" (the one being funded by NATO * see articles below) have endorsed the Fort Hood attacks. They dont prove it, they simply say thats what they said!!! In addition to the recent linkage of those attacks to 9/11 by Ziovision who claims that Hasan knew the 9/11 hijackers, as well as the finding that a supposed "homegrown terrorist" blogger (actually a jewish guy who converted to muslim and started the website only two months before the shooting!) explicitly endorsed the attacks on his blog. They now have successfully completed the cycle, and linked the shooting incident (still unexplained) to the war in Afghanistan, conveniently timed to Obama's being pressured by Bush's military secretary for 40,000 more troops in Afghanistan to build a pipeline and dominate the opium industry.
Now I dont defend the Taliban... their mistreatment of woman, and regressive politics are repulsive, but lest we kid ourselves into believing that we are there to save the women, considering NATO special interests facilitated 9/11 (that used to launch the war) and has yet to do anything virtuous abroad other than trivial PR stunts to push forth its own global agenda.
Even if the Taliban did endorse the Fort Hood shootings (which any enemy of an invading army obviously would), its hardly grounds for more interventionism, but surely will be!!!





RSS Feed