All part of the process of shaping the image of their revolutionary wonderboy Ron Paul. Youll notice that the right side of the panel plays the role of complete and utter fucking morons. While on the left is someone who by contrast appears more sane (quite an appropriate metaphor indeed), but make no mistake he is first and foremost on Rupert Murdochs payroll, Rupert Murdoch and nearly all of his media mogul counterparts are staunch supporters of Israel, and like 54% of American people of Jewish decent, thinks Israel is entitled to "preventative measures". The blatant racism and weak arguments of the right make Napolitano look like a superstar, as Ron Paul is groomed as the next capitalist revolutionary, while playing on the insecurities and selfish ambitions of his voting base whose motive doesnt extend beyond saving more money to exploit their freedumb with. If and when Ron Paul gets elected THAT will be the final stage of the plan. People will get a big suprise with this guy! You think Bush and Obama are bad, just wait!

Employing problem-reaction-solution microscopically is essential in the process of creating a revolutionary persona, and getting some emotive behind your side of the phony political spectrum. The 'problem' is the people pretending to be dumb (those on the right), the 'reaction' is Napolitanos constitutionalist retort, and Ron Paul is of course the solution, all brought to you by Fox news. Yet another in an ongoing attempt to incite civil unrest so to justify the proverbial cracking down when shit hits fan.

I have watched Ron Paul morph from a nobody to a "underground" somebody in the span of a few years, with some help from mainstream media making their censorship of him blatantly obvious. In addition his army of internet trollsters made a point to associate themselves with any and every progressive movement they could find. Ron Pauls name has been incorrectly dropped on so many forums and chat rooms (which he himself has termed "crazy") over the past few years that by simple classic conditioning, people have mistakenly come to associate him with the whole anti-NWO, anti-globalism culture. He is not a proponent of these views, at least not to an extent that is meaningful and that my friends would be a sign of a true leader. So long as we succomb to the naturalistic fallacy that a politician must compromise the truth to get into office, we will achieve nothing.

I am setting my watch to this one.