It would appear as though this story has appeared on Ziovision (NBC, Reuters etc.), I initially suspected it wouldn't be. I should have known when they made the pitch for Wikileaks that it was... just a pitch for Wikileaks. Send all the sensitive intel you don't want traced back to you (heehee) there, Wikileaks is open for business!  

From Sunshine Press

Watch American apaches unload on a crowd of unarmed people. Or don't and take my word for it.

The following article from the Scotland Herald strikes me as one of two things... Bullshit... or Bullshit. Why would the USA advertise to the world its military plans, it would be tactically impractical, and the only real motive for doing so is to instill FEAR in Iran's leaders. But why stop there... Its likely no war with Iran will ever be fought and they will continue to bank on the proxy wars within the region that rely on Iran's indirect support. Its likely this whole facade is for the purpose of boosting the military industry (while taking attention away from other conflicts i.e. keeping everyone ruminating whether or not they will attack Iran when they are invading everyone else!!!). The thing about this industry is if the products never get used no one is going to be disappointed. If military contractors are needy all the have to do is claim that there is a threat, and that "preventative measures" should be taken, they can then carry out a cold war which is equally (if not more) rewarding for the military industrial complex. 


If they do attack Iran, after advertising their plans, I will be surprised, 

Like who really cares about the types of weapons used!!! I realize it can having the impact of causing greater "collateral damage" but does the focus on types of weapons used take away from the primary charge of murder??

By WMD threat we of course are referring to the countries not wanting to be banked into submission and at the whim of the ziosphere like every other country, and would rather protect their own corrupt dictatorships. Fair enough. Nonetheless looks like WMD 2.0 is starting to mature... Whats that Washington? You think Iran may have some undisclosed Nuclear sites?

This isnt very optimistic, but such is life!

From Global Research

Two years before the 9/11 attacks on America, George W. Bush told a Houston journalist if elected president, “I’m going to invade Iraq.”

Bush made the comments about starting an aggressive war to veteran Houston Chronicle reporter Mickey Herskowitz, then working with Bush on his book “A Charge To Keep,” later brought out by publisher William Morrow.

This disclosure was uncovered by Russ Baker, an award-winning investigative reporter when he interviewed Herskowitz for his own book, “Family of Secrets” (Bloomsbury Press) about the Bush dynasty. However, Baker says, when he approached The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times with the potentially devastating story to President Bush prior to the 2004 presidential election, they declined to publish it.

In a new book, “Media In Crisis”(Doukathsan), Baker quotes Herskowitz as telling him: “He (Bush) said he wanted to do it(invade Iraq), and the reason he wanted to do it is he had been led to understand that you could not really have a successful presidency unless you were seen as commander-in-chief, unless you were seen as waging a war.”

Read more