The author of the following article is clearly elementary in their understanding of politricks, insisting that the cause for war is strictly GOP driven yatta yatta blah blah (not taking into account the apolitical social interest lobbies that ACTUALLY run the country), although he does accuratley iterate the reality that the US is completely dominated by their military (i.e. that Americans have no control over what their government does and are under martial law). Anyways...

The main point of his article is to distinguish what he calls "old" and "new" armies. Old armies are drafted ones, new armies are private. The author is essentially making an argument for conscription (under the guise of preserving democracy: Freedumb), insisting that without FORCING civilians to partake in the military industrial complex, this work has to be outsourced to immigrants and private armies (what he calls professional armies/ new armies) who are more disloyal to Americans (or whichever country they are supposed to represent)!!!

SO WE BETTER HAD REINSTATE THE DRAFT (see Rahm Emanuel -American/Israeli dual citizen and Obamas chief of staffs' sales pitch for the mandatory service program below)!!!!

The author of the following article is saying that professional armies ("new armies" i.e. private outsourced) have less allegiance to their own countrymen than conscripts who are forcefully removed from civilian life to go and fight on behalf of rich cocksucking whores to the almighty dollar. Fuck this deceptive BS. Instead of advocating the cessation of all war (and the removal of AIPAC), he advocates drafting American citizens with the threat of jail (who are theoretically supposed to be more loyal to the cause of a states imperialist ambitions), to ensure the Army doesnt turn against the president (who doesnt control the army anyways!!!), as if people are going to be more loyal to a government which forces it at gunpoint to make rich people richer!!! As if loyalty can be ensured by indoctrination!!!

Rahm Emmanuels civilian service program will use this argument to the advantage of conscripting more ameritards to fight on behalf of AIPAC/ Israel, while touting the deception that if this is not to occur the US will be absorbed by militarism. REALITY CHECK: Its too late for this, this happened long ago, they will be drafted and indoctrinated not to protect the president or their own country, but to carry out the agenda which was initiated and dominated by special interests. If anything the drafted army will be used AGAINST its own citizens, the social psychological stranglehold of conformity inculcated into the American individualistic psyche will doom it to this end. If you dont believe me research Asch and Milgrams conformity studies, they clearly demonstrate that most people will do anything regardless of their stated allegiance "god" or country. The myth that immigrant armies are any more disloyal than drafted ones is just that... A MYTH. The next time you hear Alex Jones rambling on about immigrant armies... THINK ABOUT WHAT THE IMPLICATIONS ARE OF WHAT HE IS SAYING!!!

The author William Pfaffs article is only a relevant solution if a country isnt already up to its neck in corruption. The only way they can round out the "NWO's" plan is with increased troop enlistment, and if they cant get that, they are going to force people. They are currently trying to lure in kids with blockbuster videogames they will advertise heavily on Ziovision, and then inconsequentially critique afterwards to appear sane and just... Like facebook... like clockwork. 

This article was linked on a webpage calling itself the "guerrilla news network", a tame yet sophisticated disinfo website, that pretends to be what it isnt.

WHAT THOUGHT PROVOKING "PATRIOTIC" COVERT NATIONAL SOCIALIST TRASH!!!! SMASHED!!!


America Owned by Its Army
By William Pfaff
Paris, November 3, 2009 – It is possible that the creation of an all-professional American army was the most dangerous decision ever taken by Congress. The nation now confronts a political crisis in which the issue has become an undeclared contest between Pentagon power and that of a newly elected president.

Barack Obama has yet to declare his decision on the war in Afghanistan, and there is every reason to think that he will follow military opinion. Yet he is under immense pressure from his Republican opponents to, in effect, renounce his presidential power, and step aside from the fundamental strategic decisions of the nation.

The officer he named to command the war in Afghanistan, Stanley McChrystal, demands a reinforcement of 40 thousand soldiers, raising the total U.S. commitment to over 100 thousand troops (or more, in the future). He says that he cannot succeed without them, and even then may be unable to win the war within a decade. Yet the American public is generally in doubt about this war, most of all the president’s own liberal electorate.

President Obama almost certainly will do as the the general requests, or something very close to it. He can read the wartime politics in this situation.

The Vietnam war was opposed by the public by the 1970s, when according to the Pentagon Papers, the government itself knew that victory was unlikely. Today the public doubts victory in the war in Afghanistan. However the version of Vietnam history most Americans (who were not there!) read today says there really was no defeat at all.

It is argued that there was only a collapse of civilian support for the war, caused by the liberal press, producing popular disaffection both at home and inside the conscript army, with a breakdown of military discipline, “fraggings” (murders) of aggressive combat leaders, and demoralization in the ranks. This is the version most military officers believe today.

Read more