It should not be understated that "WikiLeaks" has been covertly advertised by the mainstream media in the past few days over the whole leaked climate emails ordeal.

In the past few weeks wikileaks seems to be on a roll, they are hacking and leaking what appears to be critical information regarding the climate debate, and now have "leaked" 573000 pager messages that were allegedly sent during the 9/11 attacks. The half a million pages are likely to keep 9/11 truthers who will be parusing the pages for the faintest shrouds of evidence to affirm that 9/11 was an inside job® blissfully diverted before they are completley written off as anti-social nutjobs filled with malignant hatred again.

WikiLeaks has no affiliation with Wikipedia although it endorses Wikipedias objective (the stated one) which claims to facilitate the democratic exchange of information (which it really doesnt, considering the all entries first need to be approved by a deeply indoctrinated lot of CPU geeks, with the final say of course always residing with the chief editor).

On Wikileaks mainpage they flash an endorsement of their website by 'Time magazine' which is owned by Time Warner, one of the most notorious media agencies next to the Murdoch empire and far more dangerous considering its manufactured liberal image...

The opening statement of WikiLeaks reads:

"Wikileaks is a multi-jurisdictional organization to protect internal dissidents, whistleblowers, journalists and bloggers who face legal or other threats related to publishing. Our primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we are of assistance to people of all nations who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact. We have received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources."

They explicitly state their one sided objective for all to see, no mention is made of the core corruption of NATO countries and how this essentially breeds these other problems. They dont mind occupying peoples minds with thousands of leaked snippets of information which will simply be disregarded no matter how convincing they are, by the same media agency that endorses WikiLeaks, the proprietor of this leaked info...


They also add:

"Whistleblowers can submit documents anonymously and untraceably."

OH REALLY!!! Well thats good to know!!! Ill get right on that!!! I surely wont wind up dead if I send in meaningful information to corporate endorsed WikiLeaks!!!So... Fuck WikiLeaks and wasting time sifting through thousands of documents to find information which will simply be ignorantly "debunked" by those who issued the information.

Another quote from the website covering its bases

"Is Wikileaks a CIA front? Wikileaks is not a front for the CIA, MI6, FSB or any other agency. Quite the opposite actually. It's a global group of people with long standing dedication to the idea of improved transparency in institutions, especially government. We think better transparency is at the heart of less corruption and better democracies. By definition spy agencies want to hide information. We want to get it out to the public."

TRANSPARENCY???

Thats it?


...