-FAD October 18th
The above article has went mega viral, after telling anyone with half a brain what they already knew. So whats the spin? After all it is on Fox news or more precisely mainstream news, what concern is it of theirs, the same people who call you radicals when your protesting the rich, to preserve your rights? Always think about that whenever they seem to be publishing something that is coming to your defense, it is most definetly the oppositte intention at work, all part of the way the use our rational paranoia of them to irrationally fear one another.
The purpose of above article is to get you to communicate less with one another about critical issues, and self-censor out of fear that someone on your list is watching you. This is the synopticon: an oppressive system in which every actor within the system acts as a monitor for that system, simply of fear that they too are being monitored.
Any monitoring done to the average activist can be done retroactively by accessing your social media history, they do not need to have actual people on their monitoring you personally, especially if you are still circulating fox news articles (!!!!), I don't think you have much too worry about, so long as you are flipping their disinfo they are OK. They want 500 million people to think that the FBI (an agency of a few thousand), has this place on lockdown and that mainstream media cares (LOL), the illuminati (rich people) are descendent of aliens and omnipotent (LOL) when the reality is they have algorithms to ensure who gets heard, their censorship is proactive, they don't need to censor you after, they can make sure that few EVER HEAR A WORD YOU SAY. And if they were on your list, they would mostly come in the form of provocateurs, in that they would likely try to blend in, and "like" alot of the stuff you post, you keep your friends close and your enemies closer. It also fuels the privacy paradox.
-Fad
The above article has went mega viral, after telling anyone with half a brain what they already knew. So whats the spin? After all it is on Fox news or more precisely mainstream news, what concern is it of theirs, the same people who call you radicals when your protesting the rich, to preserve your rights? Always think about that whenever they seem to be publishing something that is coming to your defense, it is most definetly the oppositte intention at work, all part of the way the use our rational paranoia of them to irrationally fear one another.
The purpose of above article is to get you to communicate less with one another about critical issues, and self-censor out of fear that someone on your list is watching you. This is the synopticon: an oppressive system in which every actor within the system acts as a monitor for that system, simply of fear that they too are being monitored.
Any monitoring done to the average activist can be done retroactively by accessing your social media history, they do not need to have actual people on their monitoring you personally, especially if you are still circulating fox news articles (!!!!), I don't think you have much too worry about, so long as you are flipping their disinfo they are OK. They want 500 million people to think that the FBI (an agency of a few thousand), has this place on lockdown and that mainstream media cares (LOL), the illuminati (rich people) are descendent of aliens and omnipotent (LOL) when the reality is they have algorithms to ensure who gets heard, their censorship is proactive, they don't need to censor you after, they can make sure that few EVER HEAR A WORD YOU SAY. And if they were on your list, they would mostly come in the form of provocateurs, in that they would likely try to blend in, and "like" alot of the stuff you post, you keep your friends close and your enemies closer. It also fuels the privacy paradox.
-Fad
RSS Feed
