By Nathan Hominid (Who da feck else eh!!!)

Feb 21st 2010
In the following RT interview an unenlightened recorder (ummmmm... reporter) is paid to ask Jones about his claims that Google is censoring him by not selling ONE OF his mentally debilitating films.  (WATCH VIDEO BELOW)

She asks him (@ 3:30) how google, in not permitting him to sell his DVD, could be construed as censoring, considering that the movie is available to watch on youtube (owned by google) for free, like all of his other movies (with millions of views) while they also repeatedly post them on the front page to expedite the faux revolutions popularity boom. Before he goes on his rant attributing the supposed censorship to reverse racism (of his film called "The Obama Deception" which isn't racist at all, and is only brought up in this context in order to PROMOTE RACIAL DIVISIVENESS), a brief moment of silence elapses as she gives him the floor and he says: 

"Well I mean let me respond" --- There was no need to say this unless he needed to buy time to formulate a bullshit response, as she clearly she gave him all the room he needed to respnd. You only say that when someone interrupts you. This is a key signature of an upcoming lie. 

He then proceeds to tell us the truth:
"We had them shut down our youtube site, and I had to go to federal court and file...."

READ THAT AGAIN!!!! OR LISTEN TO IT AGAIN BELOW!!!!

Clearly he didn't mean to say this. This is called parapraxis i.e. a Freudian slip. He unconciously uttered the truth!!! 

• Parapraxis occurs due to the interference of some unconciously (dynamically repressed) WISH, conflict or train of thought... -Wikipedia

He continues later on:

"They are ok with me putting videos on their site because they can put ads on it"

Again his website is plastered with ads for survivalist products in which he owns stock, and he obviously gains revenue off those ads on youtube not that that hypocrisy matters.

His films get millions of views, unlike our videos (which I humbly believe are quite decent compared to most of the braindead shite I see) seldom get over 500!!! AND WE CRITIC THE GUY WHO IS SUPPOSEDLY BEING CENSORED!!!!  Trust me it isn't jealousy, if one of my videos did get 1 million views I clearly would be DOING SOMETHING WRONG (more on that later). It is also well known that youtube can easily manipulate viewcounts in order to make something seem more appealing to the average person swayed by concensus validity and yatta yatta, but I digress. MAIN POINT BELOW!!!!

The image below was taken a few days after fall of the republic was released and went uber viral on the internet. 
I erased my cookies at the time to ensure I wasn't getting a personalized view of the page. For the first few weeks of the films debut Google and youtube provided the medium for Jones film to go mega viral. They put it on the front page daily, everytime I would refresh the page another version of Jones film would appear somewhere among the icons. It was for many weeks steadily on googles frontpage, if their intent was to censor it, then it would not be there. 

He asked to be on RT to play the censorship card in an attempt to boost his falling credibility. So in the same way that he asked them to shut down his youtube site, he likely asked google not to sell his dvd. 

THINK ABOUT THIS: If Google (multibillion dollar company with some of the greatest corrupted minds in the country) was somehow at odds with what Alex Jones is trying to do, do you really think they would censor his video (available for free on their youtube service) knowing that it would likely increase his popularity and give creedance to what he is saying? Especially among his audience which is exceptionally edgy about these things???? If they thought it was offensive and wanted to protect Obama, it would have been censored from their online video services long ago.

If they wanted to keep it on the down-low, they would have just sold his DVD's (like rogers video) in the same way they helped popularized The Obama Deception, thats why this whole interview,  Alex Jones, RT, Youtube, and Google, are all actors in the same screenplay. They create this illusion that freedumb is still vital... (viral) it isn't. The internet as a means to effective social progress was DOA. The revolution will not be digitized folks. Watch technopoly (242 views) or the synapticon (710 views) on youtube (AD FREE) and this may make a bit more sense. 

Final note:
The Obama Deception movie isn't racist at all, and they are playing the reverse race card to MAKE IT A RACIALLY DIVISIVE ISSUE. Alex Jones had a whole slew of paranoiacs join his cause on the simple basis that Obama was black no doubt, many conservatives swallowed it whole, and Alex's market expanded significantly, when in reality no one can validly claim that the film in and of itself (in terms of specific content) is racist (although the greater agenda may be another story). 

It should not be understated that "WikiLeaks" has been covertly advertised by the mainstream media in the past few days over the whole leaked climate emails ordeal.

In the past few weeks wikileaks seems to be on a roll, they are hacking and leaking what appears to be critical information regarding the climate debate, and now have "leaked" 573000 pager messages that were allegedly sent during the 9/11 attacks. The half a million pages are likely to keep 9/11 truthers who will be parusing the pages for the faintest shrouds of evidence to affirm that 9/11 was an inside job® blissfully diverted before they are completley written off as anti-social nutjobs filled with malignant hatred again.

WikiLeaks has no affiliation with Wikipedia although it endorses Wikipedias objective (the stated one) which claims to facilitate the democratic exchange of information (which it really doesnt, considering the all entries first need to be approved by a deeply indoctrinated lot of CPU geeks, with the final say of course always residing with the chief editor).

On Wikileaks mainpage they flash an endorsement of their website by 'Time magazine' which is owned by Time Warner, one of the most notorious media agencies next to the Murdoch empire and far more dangerous considering its manufactured liberal image...

The opening statement of WikiLeaks reads:

"Wikileaks is a multi-jurisdictional organization to protect internal dissidents, whistleblowers, journalists and bloggers who face legal or other threats related to publishing. Our primary interest is in exposing oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we are of assistance to people of all nations who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact. We have received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources."

They explicitly state their one sided objective for all to see, no mention is made of the core corruption of NATO countries and how this essentially breeds these other problems. They dont mind occupying peoples minds with thousands of leaked snippets of information which will simply be disregarded no matter how convincing they are, by the same media agency that endorses WikiLeaks, the proprietor of this leaked info...


They also add:

"Whistleblowers can submit documents anonymously and untraceably."

OH REALLY!!! Well thats good to know!!! Ill get right on that!!! I surely wont wind up dead if I send in meaningful information to corporate endorsed WikiLeaks!!!So... Fuck WikiLeaks and wasting time sifting through thousands of documents to find information which will simply be ignorantly "debunked" by those who issued the information.

Another quote from the website covering its bases

"Is Wikileaks a CIA front? Wikileaks is not a front for the CIA, MI6, FSB or any other agency. Quite the opposite actually. It's a global group of people with long standing dedication to the idea of improved transparency in institutions, especially government. We think better transparency is at the heart of less corruption and better democracies. By definition spy agencies want to hide information. We want to get it out to the public."

TRANSPARENCY???

Thats it?


...