FROM MSNBC NEWS Airports toy with the idea of tossing the TSA *SEE OPINION POLL REVEALING AMERICAN COMMITMENT TO BEING FONDLED BY BLACKWATER LOL A new year has brought new resolve for airport managers who are fed up with the Transportation Security Agency. "The TSA has grown too big and we're unhappy with the way it's doing things," said Larry Dale, president of Orlando Sanford International Airport. "My board is sold on the fact that the free enterprise system works well and that we should go with a private company we can hold directly accountable for security and customer satisfaction." Dale isn't alone. Airports in Los Angeles, the Washington, D.C. metro area, Indianapolis, and Charlotte, N.C., are also considering tossing the TSA. Full-body scanners and enhanced pat-downs have spurred a loud outcry from an angry public, as well as some big hitters on Capitol Hill, and airports are looking at moving away from federal TSA workers and moving toward private contractors. Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.), recently named chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, has encouraged the nation's 200 biggest airports to opt out, calling TSA a "bloated, poorly focused and top-heavy bureaucracy." Same cost, same procedures This despite the fact that opt-out airports realize no cost savings. "TSA issues the RFP [request for proposal] and selects and manages the contractor" that steps in, said Michael McCarron, director of community affairs at San Francisco International, one of the first airports to adopt private screeners. READ MORE Add Comment From Dailymail trash news Why pick me for a 'nude' security scan?: Ex-Baywatch star claims airport staff were leering at her contours The airport security man could have chosen any one of the queue of passengers to undergo a ‘nude’ security scan. Surprise, surprise, he picked blonde ex-Playboy model Donna D’Errico. The former Baywatch beauty claims she was singled out although her bearded boyfriend Roy J Bank actually looks like a ‘stereotypical terrorist’. She adds that she saw officers from the Transportation Security Administration ‘leering’ at her scan, which reveals every contour of the body. Miss D’Errico, 42, was flying from Los Angeles to Pittsburgh with Mr Bank and her 17-year-old son Rhyan. She said she was pulled aside and told she would have to go through one of the full body scans which have caused much controversy since being introduced at US airports. The screening officer can see an image of the unclothed body, while the passenger’s face is blurred. Once the passenger has been screened the ‘naked’ imagery is deleted. Miss D’Errico said she felt ‘overexposed’ at being chosen to go through the scanner. She said she asked why she had been chosen from a long line of passengers. ‘In a very sarcastic tone, and still holding me by the elbow, the agent responded, “Because you caught my eye, and they didn’t”.’ She added: ‘My boyfriend sailed through with no problems, which is rather ironic in that he fits the stereotypical “look” of a terrorist when his beard has grown a bit.’ ‘After the search, I noticed that the male agent who had pulled me out of line was smiling and whispering with two other agents and glancing at me. I was outraged.’ Officials have faced widespread criticism in recent weeks over increased security measures. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336331/Baywatchs-Donna-DErrico-picked-nude-TSA-body-scan-airport-staff-leered.html#ixzz17VvLHWIB Fadthrashers- Nov 19th The TSA is now hinting that they are going to be makiing some concessions to the outlandish screening policies that were recently implimented. This is the most commonly used and nearly fullproof method of incrementally getting what you want out of people, and they use it on us all the time. Essentially it involves them taking 2 steps toward their agenda and 1 step back to appease us. Door-in-the-face salesman technique (from Thierpedia) The door-in-the-face (DITF) technique is a persuasion method. Compliance with the request of concern is enhanced by first making an extremely large request that the respondent will obviously turn down, with a metaphorical slamming of a door in the persuader's face. The respondent is then more likely to accede to a second, more reasonable request than if this second request were made without the first, extreme request. FROM POLITICO TSA chief: Screening may evolve Heeding a sudden furor, John Pistole, administrator of the Transportation Security Administration, said in a Sunday afternoon statement to POLITICO that airport screening procedures “will be adapted as conditions warrant,” in an effort to make them “as minimally invasive as possible, while still providing the security that the American people want and deserve.” TSA's new flexibility comes as the government gears up for a flood of travel over the Thanksgiving holiday weekend. Administration officials say any changes are more likely to be in the implementation of the security procedures than in the security measures themselves. Pistole’s statement to POLITICO modified his vow a few hours earlier on CNN’s “State of the Union” that the procedures were "not going to change." Both President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said over the weekend that the administration was continually looking for ways to refine the screening to make it less intrusive and frustrating. Here is the full text of the statement from Pistole, a former deputy director of the FBI: "We welcome feedback and comments on the screening procedures from the traveling public, and we will work to make them as minimally invasive as possible, while still providing the security that the American people want and deserve. We are constantly evaluating and adapting our security measures, and as we have said from the beginning, we are seeking to strike the right balance between privacy and security. Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45460.html#ixzz160T6V1mS Left/ right to bicker over who gets to do fondeling WDBO Local News Sanford Airport to opt out of TSA screening Reporter: Ken Tyndall The backlash continues over those new TSA screening measures, and now one Central Florida airport has decided to go with a private security screening firm. Orlando Sanford International Airport has decided to opt out from TSA screening. "All of our due diligence shows it's the way to go," said Larry Dale, the director of the Sanford Airport Authority. "You're going to get better service at a better price and more accountability and better customer service." Dale says he will be sending a letter requesting to opt out from TSA screening, and instead the airport will choose one of the five approved private screening companies to take over. Congressman John Mica, who's expected to lead the powerful Transportation Committee next year, says the TSA is crying out for reform. "I think TSA is overstepping its bounds," said Mica. Dale says, if all goes as planned, the private security firm could take over in about 12 months. The TSA points out that even if an airport decides to use a private firm for security, the screeners still must follow TSA guidelines. That would include using enhanced pat-downs and the full-body scanners if they are installed at the airport. SEE MORE Note the nearly 1 million views on youtube entailing corporate sponsorship Study this article from WIRED magazine. *You see what they do, they retain the initial idea that you are not safe, while offering up some half-assed critique of the human lifescan to appease moral morons. They "wont keep us safe" so the premise that we are not safe is not up for debate, much less why we "are not safe" clearly because people have too much time on their hands and just like blowing themselves up for no reason, notice how it encourages espionage and proactive security as in . Fundumbental attribution error. Junk Security: ‘Naked Scanners’ Won’t Keep Us Safe [Updated] In May, Transportation Security Administration screener Rolando Negrin pummeled a co-worker with his government-issued baton. The feud began, according to a Miami-Dade Police Department report, after Mr. Negrin’s training session with one of the agency’s whole-body imagers. The scan “revealed [Mr. Negrin] had a small penis,” the disgruntled co-worker told police. After a few months, he “could not take the jokes any more and lost his mind.” Now the TSA is rolling out these ultra-revealing imagers across the country in an attempt to uncover hidden threats like the so-called underwear bomb found on a Detroit-bound flight last Christmas. The agency and the scanners’ manufacturers insist they’ve installed features and instituted procedures that will make passenger embarrassments impossible. But the larger question is whether the TSA’s tech-centric approach to security makes any sense at all. Even the most modest of us would probably agree to a brief flash of quasi-nudity if it would really ensure a safe flight. That’s not the deal the TSA is offering. Instead, the agency is asking for Rolando Negrin-style revelations in exchange for incremental, ineffable security improvements against particular kinds of concealed weapons. It’s the same kind of trade-off TSA implicitly provided when it ordered us to take off our sneakers (to stop shoe bombs), and to chuck our water bottles (to prevent liquid explosives). Security guru and scanner-suit plaintiff Bruce Schneier calls it “magical thinking…. Descend on what the terrorists happened to do last time, and we’ll all be safe. As if they won’t think of something else.” Which, of course, they invariably do. Attackers are already starting to smuggle weapons in body cavities, going where even the most adroit body scanners do not tread. My article in today’s Wall Street Journal has more detail on the scanners in use and the details they reveal. But it’s not all gloomy skies. There’s some hope that the TSA may be changing course, at least a bit. New TSA chief John Pistole says the agency has to shift from a threat-driven outfit into an “intelligence-driven” organization. There are some signs that such a move may be afoot. On the night in late October that Saudi intelligence tipped the American government off to a plot to blow up planes using explosives packed in printer cartridges, Pistole got a call from White House counterrrorism czar John Brennan. The TSA was then able to give new marching orders to everyone from air marshals to cargo inspectors. An agency team was even dispatched to Yemen, where the bombs originated. Genital scans for airport security 04/28/2010
ScanWow!!! 04/06/2010
Unnaturally busty women to get fondled at Airport after passing through full body scanner 03/24/2010
In light of the many terrorist patsies manifesting out of the panoptical woodwork the oppressive infrastructure that envelops us is capitalizing on the oppurtunity to impliment a new invasive screening technology for consumer protection... The technology allows security personelle to see through a passengers clothing to detect whether or not they are a potential threat. As far as privacy goes, who gives a fuck. As if you should take offense to someone eyeballing the outline of your set anyways!!! Fuck off, because you aint that special!!! The media is focusing on it being an issue of privacy, which intentionally geared towards taking attention away from the potential negative health impacts of the millimeter waves utilized by the technology. Millimeter waves are also used in the militaries Active Denial System which causes a burning skin sensation and is used to disperse large crowds. The same technology, but to a lesser extent will be used in these airport detection systems. I am thinking that the focus on it being a privacy issue is merely a red herring to conceal its potential health risks... Review the videos below.... I am no physicist but if the tech burns your skin in one instance, then I cant see how it can have no impact in another, frequent flyers beware!!! If your lucky you will save up enough miles to pay for the radiation you will need to kill the cancer caused by the radiation from the device put there to keep you safe!!! | All ArchivesFebruary 2011 |







RSS Feed