FROM DAILY MAIL WHOOORES This is only a segment of the article thats trying to conflate a cataclysmic solar flare scenario with terrorism, click link for whole thing Scientists are said to fear that a similar effect could be achieved by a hostile power exploding a nuclear weapon in space, producing a massive burst of electromagnetic energy known as a high altitude electromagnetic pulse. Mr Fox also warned that countries seeking nuclear capabilities could use them in a different way to the traditional 'nuclear strike" method used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War. Citing North Korea and Iran, Dr Fox said countries seeking nuclear capabilities could use them in a different way to the traditional 'nuclear strike' method used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War. This could involve a nuclear detonation in the upper atmosphere that would knock out vital electronic systems by producing an electro-magnetic pulse, he said. He warned that terrorists might also seek to employ similar methods as he urged the public to take greater heed of the threat. 'I think it's a subject that we need to give a good deal more attention to, not least because we are in an era where there are those who seem to believe that we can choose to enter or not enter certain conflicts, and also because we live in a war where proliferation is becoming more not less the case,' the Defence Secretary said. 'And when we are discussing North Korea or Iran, for example, people need to understand there are other risks than just what we would consider the sort of nuclear strike we saw in Nagasaki or Hiroshima. 'The range of risks out there are many-fold and I think we need to make that extremely apparent to the public.' Dr Fox insisted that the threat of such an attack was 'low', but that the Government was working internationally with telecoms, energy and transport companies to increase resilience. 'With reliance, for instance on technology, comes vulnerability, and vulnerability can invite attack,' he went on. 'Our wider reliance on digital technologies will not have gone unnoticed among those who would mean us harm. 'We will need to ensure that those same technological innovations that provide advantage do not become our Achilles heel.' Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1313858/Solar-flare-paralyse-Earth-2013.html#ixzz10JoxKBx7 Add Comment From NEWS.AU AFTER 10 years of comparative slumber, the sun is waking up - and it's got astronomers on full alert. This week several US media outlets reported that NASA was warning the massive flare that caused spectacular light shows on Earth earlier this month was just a precursor to a massive solar storm building that had the potential to wipe out the entire planet's power grid. NASA has since rebutted those reports, saying it could come "100 years away or just 100 days", but an Australian astronomer says the space community is betting on the sooner scenario rather than the latter. Despite its rebuttal, NASA's been watching out for this storm since 2006 and reports from the US this week claim the storms could hit on that most Hollywood of disaster dates - 2012. Similar storms back in 1859 and 1921 caused worldwide chaos, wiping out telegraph wires on a massive scale. The 2012 storm has the potential to be even more disruptive. "The general consensus among general astronomers (and certainly solar astronomers) is that this coming Solar maximum (2012 but possibly later into 2013) will be the most violent in 100 years," astronomy lecturer and columnist Dave Reneke said. "A bold statement and one taken seriously by those it will affect most, namely airline companies, communications companies and anyone working with modern GPS systems. "They can even trip circuit breakers and knock out orbiting satellites, as has already been done this year." Regardless, the point astronomers are making is it doesn't matter if the next Solar Max isn't the worst in history, or even as bad as the 1859 storms. It's the fact that there hasn't been one since the mid-80s. Commodore had just launched the Amiga and the only digital storm making the news was Tetris. No one really knows what effect the 2012-2013 Solar Max will have on today's digital-reliant society. Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/sun-storm-to-hit-with-force-of-100-bombs/story-e6frfro0-1225909999465#ixzz0xfWqOfMf 2012 olympic mascots revealed (reveal) 05/19/2010
They don't look like dancing all-seeing eyes at all!!! Complete with CCTV!!! Read more @ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/olympics/london2012/7741352/London-2012-Olympic-mascots-Wenlock-and-Mandeville-unveiled.html So the olympic committee claims the two cyclops are named after Wenlock (birthplace of the olympics) and Stoke Mandevilles spinal injuries unit (related to the paralympic games... but I have found definitions which seem more appropriate!!! Mandeville The one on the right goes by the name Mandeville, based on my brief research alludes to Bernard Mandeville (philosopher who coincidentally was of the belief) Mandeville's philosophy gave great offence at the time, and has always been stigmatized as false, cynical and degrading. His main thesis is that the actions of men cannot be divided into lower and higher. The higher life of man is merely a fiction introduced by philosophers and rulers to simplify government and the relations of society. In fact, virtue (which he defined as "every performance by which man, contrary to the impulse of nature, should endeavour the benefit of others, or the conquest of his own passions, out of a rational ambition of being good") is actually detrimental to the state in its commercial and intellectual progress, for it is the vices (i.e. the self-regarding actions of men) which alone, by means of inventions and the circulation of capital in connection with luxurious living, stimulate society into action and progress.--- I can't say whether this is the Mandeville they are referring to but hey it seems quite appropriate!!!! Wenlock A geographical period of time "The Wenlock Epoch of the Silurian Period: 428 to 423 Mya", the image of the cyclops may find relevance here in that the cyclops is thought to be is a member of a primordial race of giants, each with a single eye in the middle of its forehead. Among other functions the cyclops endowed Hades (basically satan) with the power of invisibility. So what do we have here!!! 1) A logo which blatantly spells out Zion. 2) A philosophy of evil that coincidentally happens to have the same name as one of the mascots. 3) Reference to "primordial races of giants" in designing it to look like a cyclops. References to primordial epochs of time... 4) Characters shaped like pyramid fucking cameras, one of which touts primordial fish hand!!! That's from about 5 minutes of research, can't wait to see what premature conclusions others come to!!!! Gloomsday Volcano News Currents 04/18/2010
News currents of interest surrounding Iceland VolcanoGlobal cooling.... what happens if the Iceland Volcano blows http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/03/global-cooling-what-happens-if-the-iceland-volcano-blows/1 How severe this volcano actually is (Rated as a 2 according to Volcanic Explosivity Index) The highest ever recorded was a 7 http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/0418/Five-biggest-volcano-eruptions-in-recent-history An NBC piece attempting to link global warming with Volcanoes http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36627947/ns/us_news-environment/ War Games (aviation) taking place in spite of ash clouds http://www.usafe.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123199666 Volcano could last for months, year? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/7601701/Volcano-chaos-could-continue-for-months.html Media paints doomday scenario based on Iceland volcanic activity http://www.todayonline.com/World/EDC100324-0000074/Sign-of-bigger-things-to-come More gloomsday predictions http://newsblaze.com/story/20100325063433ianb.nb/topstory.html Scientists warn this is only the beginning http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/earth-environment/article7100906.ece BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!! OFFBEAT: pyroclastic flows caused by massive explosions2012 market review 12/07/2009
Thanks to the internet I was able to watch this movie for free :) It took me a while to force myself to endure this much John Cusack nearly dying but for the sake of setting right the delusions of a mass of misguided halfwits I persisted... I've compiled some thoughts on this years blockbuster dose of elite scripture. Lets examine the cast Woody Harrelson as Alex Jones and other Danny Glover as Barack Obama John Cusack as YOU A bunch of old white dudes as "the elites" A bunch of fanatical nobodies as "the human race" If you are worried about me spoiling this movie for you in my telling you everything about it, have no fear, it is the same movie you saw last year around this time, and the year before that, it is the same shitty plotline overstretched across 2 hours of the same indoctrinating disinfo you have already been desensitized to so dont sweat it. The movie Anyways... so its the year 2012 and scientists reach the exciting conclusion (exciting in the sense of not having to go to work after it happens) that a solar storm (and numerous other factors) are going to have catastropic impacts on the planets crust, causing volcanos, tsunamis, tidalwaves, earthquakes amounting to worldwide devastation, and the complete destruction of everything humanity has ever created (with the exception of John Cusack and his kids)... Oh and a number of massive "Arcs" which are made in China (literally) and paid for by what the movie terms "the private sector" (i.e. rich people). No I am serious... they actual say that in the movie. The initial deception here is that a solar storm will in some way contribute to the calamities of 2012. They are likely doing this so that we come to associate the scientifically proven 11 year solar cycle (that is set to repeat in 2012) with the end of times (Y2K style) so when the time comes they can hit us up for more $$$ to protect us... Where do I begin... For starters Danny Glover plays the role of the audacious one non other than... Barack Obama, when he hears the news that the world is going to end and is offered a place on a secret vessel in which he and the elites would have been safe, he instead declines and chooses to "go down with his ship" and play the role of the selfless compassionate president (to reinforce delusions we have for the real president) by staying with the people to die on land in the end. Danny Glovers sidekick (some white dude who calls the shots through the whole movie to relieve all the christians watching the film of their Obama is a radical muslim put here to kill white people bit) plays the role of the selfish asshole, who just tries to save his own ass which elevates Danny Glovers (Obamas) character an angelic yet impractical status. When Danny Glover (Obama) gives up his seat for a "scientist" he says that "1 scientist will be worth more than 20 old politicians"... right. The racial demographics of the 'arcs' in the movie was something I felt the need to initially compliment on but have decided to let you use your imagination for that one. Suprisingly the movie shows the Chinese and Russians in a good light. Both are portayed as powerful and noble forces who help save all the westerners. The chinese labourers engineer the massive arcs built for the rich, and sure enough the workers (actors) plight as "oppressed" was complimented by one of the characters going on an obligatory bolshevik rant. A russian pilot gave his life to save non other than John Cusack. References were also made to Russias engineering capabilities, when one of the characters cracks a joke about the size of the Russians plane, and the audience laughs on cue (I watched a cammed version). All and all the message is clear Russia and China are people we will use to reach our objectives (i.e.globalism). The main thing that bothered me in this movie is how it tries to get the slaves to rationalize the emergency protocols that are made in anticipation of the apocalypse. Basically the elites are shown to be compassionate people when at the end they decide to open the gates of the "Arc" and let in all the pesky humans who are raising shit outside the Arc inside to safety right before shit hits the fan (all the rich people who paid money to get to the dock). The movie also teaches people that in the case of such an event that the powers that be are justified in NOT telling them it is going to happen, as there would be chaos and pandemonium, and that only the 'private sector' will save them. It teaches people that its not their lives that matter, but the elites, or as they call it "the species survival". The message with the private sector is probably so that people will demand (when the time comes) that governments do more to protect them from nature... Whats more, the movie fuels right wing christian fanaticism, with the arc and the whole Woody Harrelson as the crazy Jesus freak that everyone should have listened to bit. The movie depicts the doomsday crowd in a near favorable light, with its concessions that "oh they were right all along" and we should have listened to them blah blah blah. Woody Harrelson plays the doomsday radio host role well, he ironically is one of the first to die in the big volcanic eruption that destroys the planet, all the while broadcasting his radio show in real time while standing on a cliff at the cusp of the volcano telling his audience "I told you so, I told you so" right before he is swallowed in flames. I admit that was pretty epic... But they were somehow able to maintain the ideas craziness while at the same time demonstrating that yeah, the christians were right... if that makes any sense. This also makes people like Alex Jones look all the more insane... except t the extent that their shock jockery is beneficial to the upcoming solar storm deception?!!?? its perplexing indeed... UPCOMING TECH The movie advertises upcoming facial recognition technology and cell phone thumbprint scanners (coming soon), maybe even ....Arcs... The scary thing about this movie for me is that in spite of its apparent dignification of the 2012 apocalypse idea, its almost as if it serves the purpose of making the idea fashionable, that is, a fad. I for one have never bought into the 2012 idea... but after viewing teh ambiguous subliminal messages they are injecting with this movie, this in itself, is causing me to have second thoughts about the idea itself. As much as they show it to be a plausible scenario and how they show the "crazy political activist" to have been right, they also do alot to make the WHOLE idea seem absurd and nothing more than a hollywood cliche something we should briefly mull over and forget about... Either they simply capitalized on this entertainment oppurtunity to subtly promote the idea of world government and species-ism or it was intended to actually make the idea look like an absurdity that we are supposed to reject completely, making me wonder if something is going to happen around this time (not necessarily "armageddon" but some potential threat with which they will tap this latent 2012 hysteria. It would seem as though the "Oh thats all bullshit, its just a movie" comments are becoming dangerously pervasive, to make it all appear as if its a movie and that we should now not think about it anymore and keep shopping. I dont think the human race will be going extinct in 2012, but I also think they are blatantly preparing us for some global commitment of sorts, for all I know it could just be a movie that was funded by Obamas hope foundation, but I think the messages are deeper than that... in case of emergency everybody keep calm, large scale catastrophe is what it is... Get the government to build some arcs and what not... | All ArchivesFebruary 2011 |












RSS Feed