Read National Post article here

NOTE: When clicking the NP link notice the image they use to sell the story, it is not that of "the world" rather a picture of Chinese people... Clearly trying to convince us that "non-westerners" are who they are talking about... The problem with this picture isnt the people in it, rather the Pepsi logo in the top right hand side which IS THE REAL PROBLEM!!! And hows that for free advertising!!! Its obvious how they are trying to devalue life with this image, present them as some kind of disease thats out of control, that needs to be culled... Clearly, civilization and RTS video games done gone to this reporters head!!!- Image from National Post

Part of the Christian antithesis to global depopulation initiatives is rooted in their patriotic embrace of the concept of freedumb. That people should be free to do as they please and go forth and multiply. I also explain my views on overpopulation concisely here. I dont necessarily object to population equalibrium by which a society attempts to maintain a certain population by way of family planning (natural methods). However the idea of mandating a one child policy the world over (considering the variations in birth rates and the long term effects of male overpopulation) is clearly sinister when you look at who is pumping out the babies. Western nations cannot even repopulate themselves (with fertilty rates ranging from 1.3 to 2.1 per every 2 people), so clearly this one child policy is intended for the developing world (which in some instances use 30 times less the amount of resources than the average westerner). For every 30 people in India, 1 American consumes an equal amount of resources. Hence the importance of emphasizing the quality of our lifestyles (something considered taboo within the freedumb movement) over the quanity of lives in existence. In addition the poor people within western societies (the proletariat) have a higher rate of reproduction so the goal is get rid of alot of them too, with the help of phony liberals polar bear pleas, planned parenthood etc. Nonetheless our population cannot expand forever without being regulated at some point, its a simple mathematical fact. This problem may not naturally present itself for a hundred years, but nonetheless it inevitably will.

I believe that life is a puzzle. I believe that the goal of any species is to reach a point by which it can determine its own fate, before it overpopulates to a counterproductive extent (i.e. to the point of breeding disease, exhaustion of resources in environment, extinction etc). The earth went for broke when it rolled the dice this time around... Because the natural growth of technology has been impeded by corrupt industrial forces, our growth as a species has been stunted, and we likely will ive and die on easter island before ever developing the capacity to thrust Gaia to the next level. If these industrial impediments could be abolished, then indeed there would be less need to regulate our own population because we would have the technological capacity to live in balance with nature and thus support a greater (i.e. not unlimited) population.

Its likely that the infertility and insecurity brought with industrialization will do the work for them on our side of the globe, nonetheless the article is foreshadowing a some direct global initiative to eugenicize the sperm of McDonalds and 7-11 employees, and of course billions of brown people.