Vaccine blocks cocaine high in mice January 4, 2011 Researchers have produced a lasting anti-cocaine immunity in mice by giving them a safe vaccine that combines bits of the common cold virus with a particle that mimics cocaine. In their study, published Jan. 4 in the online edition of Molecular Therapy and funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the researchers say this novel strategy might be the first to offer cocaine addicts a fairly simple way to break and reverse their habit, and it might also be useful in treating other addictions, such as to nicotine, heroin and other opiates. "Our very dramatic data shows that we can protect mice against the effects of cocaine, and we think this approach could be very promising in fighting addiction in humans," says the study's lead investigator, Dr. Ronald G. Crystal, chairman and professor of genetic medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College. He says the antibody immune response produced in lab mice by the vaccine binds to, and sequesters, cocaine molecules before the drug reached the brains of these animals — and prevents any cocaine-related hyperactivity. The vaccine effect lasted for at least 13 weeks, the longest time point evaluated. "While other attempts at producing immunity against cocaine have been tried, this is the first that will likely not require multiple, expensive infusions, and that can move quickly into human trials," Dr. Crystal says. "There is currently no FDA-approved vaccine for any drug addiction." "An approach that works is desperately needed for cocaine addiction, which is an intransigent problem worldwide," he adds. "There are no therapies now." The novelty of this possible treatment is that it hooks a chemical that is very similar in structure to cocaine, onto components of the adenovirus, a common cold virus. In this way, the human immune system is alerted to an infectious agent (the virus) but also learns to "see" the cocaine as an intruder as well, Dr. Crystal says. Once the structure of the new intruder is recognized, natural immunity builds to cocaine particles, so any time cocaine is snorted or used in any way, antibodies to the substance are quickly produced and the cocaine molecules are engulfed by the antibodies and prevented from reaching the brain. "The human immune system doesn't naturally tag cocaine as something to be destroyed — just like all small-molecule drugs are not eliminated by antibodies," he says. "We have engineered this response so that it is against the cocaine mimic." In this study, a team of researchers — scientists from Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University in Ithaca, and the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, Calif. — ripped apart an adenovirus, retrieving only the components that elicit an immune response and discarding those that produce sickness. They then hooked the cocaine analog on to these proteins to make the vaccine. "We used the cocaine analog because it is a little more stable than cocaine, and it also elicits better immunity," Dr. Crystal says. The researchers then injected billions of these viral concoctions into "garden variety" laboratory mice (mice that are not genetically engineered). They found a strong immune response was generated against the vaccine, and that these antibodies, when put in test tubes, gobbled up cocaine. They then tested the vaccine's effect on behavior, and found that mice that received the vaccine before cocaine were much less hyperactive while on the drug than mice that were not vaccinated. The effect was even seen in mice that received large, repetitive doses of cocaine. Proportionally, the cocaine doses reflected amounts that humans might use. READ MORE ' Add Comment By Fad- Nocebos fronting as placebos, cracking down on Zcience A few months back I made some cheeky comment about placebos not actually being inert, in that no substance is entirely 100% inert. Well it turns out I was drawing from the zeitgeist of ideas. I came across this article on the "natural news" (link below), the implications of which were first unclear because of how they talk about it, and how I think, so I thought I would write it out so I could understand what this is all about... and add something that the writer failed to add in the article as he was too excited about the prospect of hammering big pharma. Which is fine, I would be too. Say you want to test whether or not a drug will clear up cancer. You make a control group and an experimental group. In the control group you give participants (P's) a substance which is thought to be inert (usually a sugar pill), and in the experimental group you give them the actual drug you want to test. Now the trick is that you dont tell the P's that the sugar pill is actually a sugar pill, because you want them to think that they are being given the real drug. Scientists do this because it has been found that if your doctor merely suggests (power of suggestion/ expectancy effect) that something will make you better, that it actually tends to (thus named the placebo effect). It has some kind of psychosomatic effect (mind over matter), maybe it alleviates stress which allows the condition to heal, or perhaps its something more elaborate with regards to belief who knows. The reasons why it works is unclear at this point in the research (at least officially). So in order to see if a drug actually works, you need to test it against an inert substance. Check. But here is the problem. As I cheekily uttered in post a month or so ago, there is no such thing as a true dissolvable placebo, as everything you ingest has SOME chemical component which will have SOME physical effect, ranging from minor to significant. What this article is suggesting is that drug companies are using placebos (that actually cause whatever they are testing to be negatively effected, or nocebos) in order to counteract the participants expectancy effects and make their drug look better by contrast, which could potentially mean that the placebo effect was MORE influential then we are lead to believe it was in some of these experiments. So say in that experiment above the control group was given this inert pill... but it wasn't actually inert (as discussed its impossible to make it 100%) but in this scenario the pill was actually designed to cause the participants symptoms/ disease to intensify(physical), which is at odds with their belief (psychological) that it will work, and the corresponding placebo effect. So say the results were such that: Control group: 15% effectiveness Experimental: 25% effectiveness OK... so technically thats FDA approved as its 10% more effective than the placebo. But what if the supposed inert substance actually caused a drop of effectiveness by say 10%, meaning it contained some chemical that caused an adverse PHYSICAL reaction on the P's condition, well that would mean that the drug that was approvedwas not effective at all, and that the only thing that cured those 25% was the mere suggestion by their doctors that it would. THIER MINDS. Because there are loose standards surrounding the use of placebo, it is quite possible then (possible) that our capacity to heal ourselves through mere belief alone is in fact greater than what we have been told in some instances. The research in this article could have immense implications... the article covers almost all the angles, but fails to mention its most fundamental implication and achievement, that the idea that we can heal certain ailments just by believing it may be far greater then we have been lead to... believe!!!! If you were a drug company and could use a placebo that would make your drug look better and no one would notice because of slack regulation, don't you think you would do it? (assuming your an evil fuckbag that is) Sorry to be so longwinded, but in order for me to confidently understand something I need to understand its every nuance, writing it out helps, maybe it helped you too, cheers! Now back to the news. Read the article here: http://www.naturalnews.com/030209_placebo_medical_fraud.html *Nocebo also means adverse effects due to the participants negative expectations that it wont work, I use it to describe the adverse reactions of a placebo in this write up. From the Independent Female sexual dysfunction 'was invented by drugs industry' By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor Female sexual dysfunction – which is claimed to affect up to two thirds of women – is a disorder invented by the pharmaceutical industry to build global markets for drugs to treat it, it is claimed today. Drug companies have invested millions in the search for a female equivalent of Viagra, so far without success. But while doing so they have stoked demand by creating a buzz around the disorder they have created, according to Ray Moynihan, a lecturer at the University of Newcastle in Australia. Corporate employees worked with medical opinion leaders, ran surveys aimed at portraying the problem as widespread and helped create the diagnostic instruments to persuade women that their sexual difficulties deserved a medical label. But sex problems in women are far more complex than they are in men, encompassing lack of desire, lack of arousal and lack of orgasm and the drug industry's narrow focus is failing them. READ MORE Pharmaceutical drug addiction causing massive increase in crime Monday, September 27, 2010 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer (NaturalNews) It used to be that thieves targeted wealthy homes filled with expensive things like jewelry to rob, but according to officials, a new kind of thief is on the loose: the pharmaceutical drug addict. They say prescription drugs like opiate painkillers are responsible for causing a widespread increase in crime against sick and elderly people whose medicine cabinets are loaded with legal narcotics. The problem has gotten so out of control that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) recently held a nationwide drug take-back day in which citizens were encouraged to take their old and unused pharmaceutical drugs to one of 4,000 drop-off points to be properly disposed of. "We're seeing people desperately and aggressively trying to get their hands on these pills," Janet T. Mills, the attorney general in Maine, is cited as saying in a recent New York Timespiece. "Home invasions, robberies, assaults, homicides, thefts -- all kinds of crimes are being linked to prescription drugs." According to recent reports, a masked man forcibly entered the home of a 77-year-old Maine woman and proceeded to knock her to the ground, stealing her Oxycontin pills at knifepoint. And in Massachusetts, a similar event took place when three armed men broke into a home, tied up the owner's hands and feet with duct tape, and ravaged the home in search of Oxycontin. Desperate addicts have even gone so far as to pose as potential home buyers at open houses, where they proceed to the nearest medicine cabinet to snatch whatever they can find. "One will distract the realtor while the other goes and trifles through the medicine cabinet looking for pain medication," explained Matthew Murphy, assistant special agent in charge of the DEA's New England field division in Boston. Officials are urging members of the public to properly dispose of any expired, unused or unneeded medicines as soon as possible to avoid becoming victims of pharmaceutical crimes. READ MORE New Drug Kills Pain by Boosting Body's Naturally Occurring Marijuana-Like Compound In a boon for pain research, American and Italian scientists say they have found a new drug that allows a marijuana-like substance to control pain at a specific site in the body. Their study suggests cannabinoid compounds could be used in new pain medications that are non-addictive and non-sedative, unlike opiates. The drug works by blocking an enzyme that degrades a compound called anandamide, whose name comes from the Sanskrit word for “bliss.” Anandamide exists naturally in humans and is chemically similar to THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. It was thought to work only in the brain, but with the new drug, URB937, anandamide works in peripheral tissues, too. Led by Daniele Piomelli, director of the Center for Drug Discovery at the University of California-Irvine, teams from the Italian universities of Urbino and Parma gave the URB937 drug to rats and mice. It suppresses an enzyme called FAAH, which boosts the amount of anandamide. It doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier, but it stilldoes lessen pain at the site of an injury, the researchers say. Anandamide is part of the endocannabinoid system, which is involved in modulating appetite, pain, mood and memory. (The name is derived from the system’s involvement in responding to THC.) Blocking FAAH can have the same pain-mitigation effects without generating a marijuana high, according to a UC-Irvine news release. READ MORE Russian scientist who invented anti-aging drugs to be ostracized by scientific community soon 09/17/2010
Cocaine addicts to be given Ritalin 09/07/2010
Anything but marijuana, otherwise it would lead to a short lived economic collapse, initiated by the death of prison privatization but only to be soon left in the dust of prosperity when the money starts to flow into progressive projects instead of the bank accounts of corporate conspirators. FROM PHYSORG: Ritalin improves brain function, task performance in cocaine abusers September 7, 2010
Methylphenidate normalizes functional magnetic resonance imaging cingulate responses and reduces impulsivity on a salient cognitive task in individuals with cocaine addiction. Above is an axial map that shows the caudal dorsal anterior cingulate (cdACC) and rostroventromedial anterior cingulate (extending to the medial orbitofrontal cortex, rvACC/mOFC) — cortical regions that showed enhanced responses to methylphenidate as compared to placebo in cocaine addicted individuals. These regions are crucial for the ability to regulate behavior, cognition and emotion. (PhysOrg.com) -- Brain-scanning study shows Ritalin improves impaired brain function in people addicted to cocaine, implying it could play a role in facilitating recovery from addiction. A brain-scanning study at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Brookhaven National Laboratory, conducted with collaborators from Stony Brook University, reveals that an oral dose of methylphenidate, commonly known as Ritalin, improves impaired brain function and enhances cognitive performance in people who are addicted to cocaine. The study — to be published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences the week of TKTK, 2010 — suggests that methylphenidate, combined with cognitive interventions, may have a role in facilitating recovery from drug addiction. “Previous studies have shown that methylphenidate does not decrease cocaine use or prevent relapse in addicted individuals, so it wouldn’t work to treat cocaine addiction directly, the way methadone works to treat heroin abuse,” said Rita Z. Goldstein, a psychologist who leads the neuropsychoimaging group at Brookhaven Lab. “But other studies show that methylphenidate does decrease behaviors such as risk taking and impulsivity and improves brain function and cognitive performance in a range of other conditions that also affect the brain’s prefrontal cortex, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), some forms of dementia, and certain kinds of brain injury. If it also has these positive effects in cocaine-addicted individuals, then it could be a useful component of a treatment strategy that helps increase recovering addicts’ impulse control.” To find out, Goldstein’s group performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) on 13 cocaine users and 14 healthy control subjects who were asked to perform a cognitive task after being given either a low oral dose of methylphenidate (20 milligrams) or a placebo. The task involved pushing a button to correctly identify the color of a printed word; some words had to do with drug use, others were “neutral.” Subjects received monetary rewards for correct answers. READ MORE Smart pill texts - time for your medicine Volunteers are being recruited to take standard versions of their heart pill fitted with a microchip. When swallowed, the chip send signals to a patch attached to the patient's shoulder. The patch can also send a text if the patient forgets to take the medication. The system, known as Raisin, also monitors heart activity and how well the patient is sleeping all of which may signal a deteriorating condition. It costs a few cents per pill and was initially tested in the US, where it lifted patients' consistency in taking their medication from 30 per cent to 80 per cent. If successful, the four-month test could lead to a year-long trial by Britain's health service. Nicholas Peters, professor of cardiology at Imperial College Healthcare, said the main aim was to get heart patients to stick to taking their pills. "It will encourage patients to take responsibility for their own health," he said. With a stricter medication regimen, it is hoped their health will improve and they will be less likely to be admitted to hospital in an emergency. The chips, developed by California-based company Proteus Biomedical, are tiny, digestible sensors made from food ingredients. Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/smart-pill-texts-time-for-your-medicine/story-e6frfro0-1225905939359#ixzz0wkqCudDp Free Statins With Fast Food Could Neutralize Heart Risk, Scientists Say ScienceDaily (Aug. 12, 2010) — Fast food outlets could provide statin drugs free of charge so that customers can neutralise the heart disease dangers of fatty food, researchers at Imperial College London suggest in a new study. Statins reduce the amount of unhealthy "LDL" cholesterol in the blood. A wealth of trial data has proven them to be highly effective at lowering a person's heart attack risk. In a paper published in the American Journal of Cardiology, Dr Darrel Francis and colleagues calculate that the reduction in cardiovascular risk offered by a statin is enough to offset the increase in heart attack risk from eating a cheeseburger and a milkshake. Dr Francis, from the National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial College London, who is the senior author of the study, said: "Statins don't cut out all of the unhealthy effects of burgers and fries. It's better to avoid fatty food altogether. But we've worked out that in terms of your likelihood of having a heart attack, taking a statin can reduce your risk to more or less the same degree as a fast food meal increases it." One statin, simvastatin, is already available in low doses (10mg) over the counter at pharmacies without a prescription. Other statins are so far only prescribed by doctors, and limited by cost to patients at particular risk of heart attack or stroke. However, the cost of the tablets has fallen sharply in recent years (from ~£40/month to ~£1.50/month), such that the cost to the NHS of seeing a doctor is much greater than the cost of the tablet. "It's ironic that people are free to take as many unhealthy condiments in fast food outlets as they like, but statins, which are beneficial to heart health, have to be prescribed," Dr Francis said. Statins have among the best safety profiles of any medication. A very small proportion of regular statin users experience significant side effects, with problems in the liver and kidneys reported in between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 10,000 people. "Everybody knows that fast food is bad for you, but people continue to eat it because it tastes good. We're genetically programmed to prefer high-calorie foods, and sadly fast food chains will continue to sell unhealthy foods because it earns them a living. "It makes sense to make risk-reducing supplements available just as easily as the unhealthy condiments that are provided free of charge. It would cost less than 5p per customer -- not much different to a sachet of ketchup. "When people engage in risky behaviours like driving or smoking, they're encouraged to take measures that minimise their risk, like wearing a seatbelt or choosing cigarettes with filters. Taking a statin is a rational way of lowering some of the risks of eating a fatty meal." READ MORE Also see: | All News
ArchivesFebruary 2011 CategoriesAll |







RSS Feed