Europe to ban hundreds of herbal remedies 01/22/2011
Europe to ban hundreds of herbal remedies Safety concerns sparked drive to outlaw products By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor Thursday, 30 December 2010 Hundreds of herbal medicinal products will be banned from sale in Britain next year under what campaigners say is a "discriminatory and disproportionate" European law. With four months to go before the EU-wide ban is implemented, thousands of patients face the loss of herbal remedies that have been used in the UK for decades. From 1 May 2011, traditional herbal medicinal products must be licensed or prescribed by a registered herbal practitioner to comply with an EU directive passed in 2004. The directive was introduced in response to rising concern over adverse effects caused by herbal medicines. Read more Add Comment So Young and So Many Pills More than 25% of Kids and Teens in the U.S. Take Prescriptions on a Regular Basis By ANNA WILDE MATHEWS Gage Martindale, who is 8 years old, has been taking a blood-pressure drug since he was a toddler. "I want to be healthy, and I don't want things in my heart to go wrong," he says. And, of course, his mom is always there to check Gage's blood pressure regularly with a home monitor, and to make sure the second-grader doesn't skip a dose of his once-a-day enalapril. These days, the medicine cabinet is truly a family affair. More than a quarter of U.S. kids and teens are taking a medication on a chronic basis, according to Medco Health Solutions Inc., the biggest U.S. pharmacy-benefit manager with around 65 million members. Nearly 7% are on two or more such drugs, based on the company's database figures for 2009. Doctors and parents warn that prescribing medications to children can be problematic. There is limited research available about many drugs' effects in kids. And health-care providers and families need to be vigilant to assess the medicines' impact, both intended and not. Although the effects of some medications, like cholesterol-lowering statins, have been extensively researched in adults, the consequences of using such drugs for the bulk of a patient's lifespan are little understood. Many medications kids take on a regular basis are well known, including treatments for asthma and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Listen: Kids are taking more drugs that are associated with adults But children and teens are also taking a wide variety of other medications once considered only to be for adults, from statins to diabetes pills and sleep drugs, according to figures provided to The Wall Street Journal by IMS Health, a research firm. Prescriptions for antihypertensives in people age 19 and younger could hit 5.5 million this year if the trend though September continues, according to IMS. That would be up 17% from 2007, the earliest year available. Researchers attribute the wide usage in part to doctors and parents becoming more aware of drugs as an option for kids. Unhealthy diets and lack of exercise among children, which lead to too much weight gain and obesity, also fuel the use of some treatments, such as those for hypertension. And some conditions are likely caught and treated earlier as screening and diagnosis efforts improve. Gage, who isn't overweight, has been on hypertension drugs since he had surgery to fix a heart defect as a toddler, says his mother, Stefanie Martindale, a Conway, Ark., marketing-company manager. READ MORE By Fad- Nocebos fronting as placebos, cracking down on Zcience A few months back I made some cheeky comment about placebos not actually being inert, in that no substance is entirely 100% inert. Well it turns out I was drawing from the zeitgeist of ideas. I came across this article on the "natural news" (link below), the implications of which were first unclear because of how they talk about it, and how I think, so I thought I would write it out so I could understand what this is all about... and add something that the writer failed to add in the article as he was too excited about the prospect of hammering big pharma. Which is fine, I would be too. Say you want to test whether or not a drug will clear up cancer. You make a control group and an experimental group. In the control group you give participants (P's) a substance which is thought to be inert (usually a sugar pill), and in the experimental group you give them the actual drug you want to test. Now the trick is that you dont tell the P's that the sugar pill is actually a sugar pill, because you want them to think that they are being given the real drug. Scientists do this because it has been found that if your doctor merely suggests (power of suggestion/ expectancy effect) that something will make you better, that it actually tends to (thus named the placebo effect). It has some kind of psychosomatic effect (mind over matter), maybe it alleviates stress which allows the condition to heal, or perhaps its something more elaborate with regards to belief who knows. The reasons why it works is unclear at this point in the research (at least officially). So in order to see if a drug actually works, you need to test it against an inert substance. Check. But here is the problem. As I cheekily uttered in post a month or so ago, there is no such thing as a true dissolvable placebo, as everything you ingest has SOME chemical component which will have SOME physical effect, ranging from minor to significant. What this article is suggesting is that drug companies are using placebos (that actually cause whatever they are testing to be negatively effected, or nocebos) in order to counteract the participants expectancy effects and make their drug look better by contrast, which could potentially mean that the placebo effect was MORE influential then we are lead to believe it was in some of these experiments. So say in that experiment above the control group was given this inert pill... but it wasn't actually inert (as discussed its impossible to make it 100%) but in this scenario the pill was actually designed to cause the participants symptoms/ disease to intensify(physical), which is at odds with their belief (psychological) that it will work, and the corresponding placebo effect. So say the results were such that: Control group: 15% effectiveness Experimental: 25% effectiveness OK... so technically thats FDA approved as its 10% more effective than the placebo. But what if the supposed inert substance actually caused a drop of effectiveness by say 10%, meaning it contained some chemical that caused an adverse PHYSICAL reaction on the P's condition, well that would mean that the drug that was approvedwas not effective at all, and that the only thing that cured those 25% was the mere suggestion by their doctors that it would. THIER MINDS. Because there are loose standards surrounding the use of placebo, it is quite possible then (possible) that our capacity to heal ourselves through mere belief alone is in fact greater than what we have been told in some instances. The research in this article could have immense implications... the article covers almost all the angles, but fails to mention its most fundamental implication and achievement, that the idea that we can heal certain ailments just by believing it may be far greater then we have been lead to... believe!!!! If you were a drug company and could use a placebo that would make your drug look better and no one would notice because of slack regulation, don't you think you would do it? (assuming your an evil fuckbag that is) Sorry to be so longwinded, but in order for me to confidently understand something I need to understand its every nuance, writing it out helps, maybe it helped you too, cheers! Now back to the news. Read the article here: http://www.naturalnews.com/030209_placebo_medical_fraud.html *Nocebo also means adverse effects due to the participants negative expectations that it wont work, I use it to describe the adverse reactions of a placebo in this write up. From The Raw Story Epidemic? Half of US teens ‘meet criteria for mental disorder’ WASHINGTON — Around half of US teens meet the criteria for a mental disorder and nearly one in four report having a mood, behavior or anxiety disorder that interferes with daily life, American researchers say. Fifty-one percent of boys and 49 percent of girls aged 13-19 have a mood, behavior, anxiety or substance use disorder, according to the study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. In 22.2 percent of teens, the disorder was so severe it impaired their daily activities and caused great distress, says the study led by Kathleen Merikangas of the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH). "The prevalence of severe emotional and behavior disorders is even higher than the most frequent major physical conditions in adolescence, including asthma or diabetes," the study says. Mental problems do not get the same attention from public health authorities even though they cost US families around a quarter of a trillion dollars a year, according to the study. READ MORE From the Independent Female sexual dysfunction 'was invented by drugs industry' By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor Female sexual dysfunction – which is claimed to affect up to two thirds of women – is a disorder invented by the pharmaceutical industry to build global markets for drugs to treat it, it is claimed today. Drug companies have invested millions in the search for a female equivalent of Viagra, so far without success. But while doing so they have stoked demand by creating a buzz around the disorder they have created, according to Ray Moynihan, a lecturer at the University of Newcastle in Australia. Corporate employees worked with medical opinion leaders, ran surveys aimed at portraying the problem as widespread and helped create the diagnostic instruments to persuade women that their sexual difficulties deserved a medical label. But sex problems in women are far more complex than they are in men, encompassing lack of desire, lack of arousal and lack of orgasm and the drug industry's narrow focus is failing them. READ MORE Pharmaceutical drug addiction causing massive increase in crime Monday, September 27, 2010 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer (NaturalNews) It used to be that thieves targeted wealthy homes filled with expensive things like jewelry to rob, but according to officials, a new kind of thief is on the loose: the pharmaceutical drug addict. They say prescription drugs like opiate painkillers are responsible for causing a widespread increase in crime against sick and elderly people whose medicine cabinets are loaded with legal narcotics. The problem has gotten so out of control that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) recently held a nationwide drug take-back day in which citizens were encouraged to take their old and unused pharmaceutical drugs to one of 4,000 drop-off points to be properly disposed of. "We're seeing people desperately and aggressively trying to get their hands on these pills," Janet T. Mills, the attorney general in Maine, is cited as saying in a recent New York Timespiece. "Home invasions, robberies, assaults, homicides, thefts -- all kinds of crimes are being linked to prescription drugs." According to recent reports, a masked man forcibly entered the home of a 77-year-old Maine woman and proceeded to knock her to the ground, stealing her Oxycontin pills at knifepoint. And in Massachusetts, a similar event took place when three armed men broke into a home, tied up the owner's hands and feet with duct tape, and ravaged the home in search of Oxycontin. Desperate addicts have even gone so far as to pose as potential home buyers at open houses, where they proceed to the nearest medicine cabinet to snatch whatever they can find. "One will distract the realtor while the other goes and trifles through the medicine cabinet looking for pain medication," explained Matthew Murphy, assistant special agent in charge of the DEA's New England field division in Boston. Officials are urging members of the public to properly dispose of any expired, unused or unneeded medicines as soon as possible to avoid becoming victims of pharmaceutical crimes. READ MORE Food Investigations: Pharmaburger (video) 09/23/2010
New Drug Kills Pain by Boosting Body's Naturally Occurring Marijuana-Like Compound In a boon for pain research, American and Italian scientists say they have found a new drug that allows a marijuana-like substance to control pain at a specific site in the body. Their study suggests cannabinoid compounds could be used in new pain medications that are non-addictive and non-sedative, unlike opiates. The drug works by blocking an enzyme that degrades a compound called anandamide, whose name comes from the Sanskrit word for “bliss.” Anandamide exists naturally in humans and is chemically similar to THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. It was thought to work only in the brain, but with the new drug, URB937, anandamide works in peripheral tissues, too. Led by Daniele Piomelli, director of the Center for Drug Discovery at the University of California-Irvine, teams from the Italian universities of Urbino and Parma gave the URB937 drug to rats and mice. It suppresses an enzyme called FAAH, which boosts the amount of anandamide. It doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier, but it stilldoes lessen pain at the site of an injury, the researchers say. Anandamide is part of the endocannabinoid system, which is involved in modulating appetite, pain, mood and memory. (The name is derived from the system’s involvement in responding to THC.) Blocking FAAH can have the same pain-mitigation effects without generating a marijuana high, according to a UC-Irvine news release. READ MORE Free Statins With Fast Food Could Neutralize Heart Risk, Scientists Say ScienceDaily (Aug. 12, 2010) — Fast food outlets could provide statin drugs free of charge so that customers can neutralise the heart disease dangers of fatty food, researchers at Imperial College London suggest in a new study. Statins reduce the amount of unhealthy "LDL" cholesterol in the blood. A wealth of trial data has proven them to be highly effective at lowering a person's heart attack risk. In a paper published in the American Journal of Cardiology, Dr Darrel Francis and colleagues calculate that the reduction in cardiovascular risk offered by a statin is enough to offset the increase in heart attack risk from eating a cheeseburger and a milkshake. Dr Francis, from the National Heart and Lung Institute at Imperial College London, who is the senior author of the study, said: "Statins don't cut out all of the unhealthy effects of burgers and fries. It's better to avoid fatty food altogether. But we've worked out that in terms of your likelihood of having a heart attack, taking a statin can reduce your risk to more or less the same degree as a fast food meal increases it." One statin, simvastatin, is already available in low doses (10mg) over the counter at pharmacies without a prescription. Other statins are so far only prescribed by doctors, and limited by cost to patients at particular risk of heart attack or stroke. However, the cost of the tablets has fallen sharply in recent years (from ~£40/month to ~£1.50/month), such that the cost to the NHS of seeing a doctor is much greater than the cost of the tablet. "It's ironic that people are free to take as many unhealthy condiments in fast food outlets as they like, but statins, which are beneficial to heart health, have to be prescribed," Dr Francis said. Statins have among the best safety profiles of any medication. A very small proportion of regular statin users experience significant side effects, with problems in the liver and kidneys reported in between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 10,000 people. "Everybody knows that fast food is bad for you, but people continue to eat it because it tastes good. We're genetically programmed to prefer high-calorie foods, and sadly fast food chains will continue to sell unhealthy foods because it earns them a living. "It makes sense to make risk-reducing supplements available just as easily as the unhealthy condiments that are provided free of charge. It would cost less than 5p per customer -- not much different to a sachet of ketchup. "When people engage in risky behaviours like driving or smoking, they're encouraged to take measures that minimise their risk, like wearing a seatbelt or choosing cigarettes with filters. Taking a statin is a rational way of lowering some of the risks of eating a fatty meal." READ MORE Antidepressant narcotics found to heal spine 10/21/2009
Scientists have found that the big pharmas mental poison Lexapro when used in conjunction with a treadmill training program accelerated the recovery of people with spinal cord injury. A group who was given the drug, performed significantly greater then those just given a placebo and training. It would make sense that such an obvious side effect would be suprising as corporate drugdealers fasttrack their poisons onto the market without adequate testing nor scrutiny by the FDA. Although the article attributes the heightened functionality of the spinal cord to a chemical within the drug itself, they seem to be overlooking one obvious fact. Anti-depressants create a temporary and artificial state of mental contention, which itself has been shown to increase physical performance on a variety of dimensions. If a person feels happier, they will likely perform better be less stressed out and not be as sensitive to the pain, thereby accelerating their rehabilitation. The chemical within the drug is what scientists attribute the healing to, because they dont want people to know the secret... That is, that their bodies have everything within them to heal almost any condition, and it is merely the stress, and the self-defeating negative psychological attitude which limits them in this self-healing capacity. Anti-depressants themselves are yet another byproduct of our humanistic "me me me" society. There is a demand for them as people here feel entitled to be happy all the time. Our standards for social, and economic achievement are what dictate an articial measure of ourselves, when we feel unfulfilled along these superficial dimensions we get down on ourselves, and think something must be wrong with our brain. Never thinking that it is perhaps our worldview or our upbringing which has yielded this discontented perspective. In our efforts to get a quick fix, and not deal with our underlying problems we seek a 'diagnosis' which would enable us to use a drug to suppress our natural capacity to deal with these problems while bringing us am artifical, fleeting and very expensive state of mental contention. Its no suprise that governments (particularily in Canada) will subsidize their population for drugs, and foot the bill on a slew of pharmaceuticals, but will never cover the cost of acupuncture, or other natural healing remedies which seeks to enhance individuals ability to heal themselvs. This is because the government and the drug companies are fking criminals, who want a population strung out on their poison that will never reach their true psychological capacity to realize how much of a sham this all is, and the crux reason for why they are unhappy. Rather the population will become dependent on these legal drugs and diminism in their capacity to heal themselves and the world around them. Lexapro will release another drug for spinal cord injury and the people who take it wont put two and two together because they are too strung out, They wont realize that it is their happiness and not a chemical which is accelerating their physical recovery. After that they will spend years trying to overcome dependency on the anti-depressant medication, and when they try to quit and have destroyed their capacity to make themselves happy, the physical condition will return... | All News
ArchivesFebruary 2011 CategoriesAll |












RSS Feed