*Article is below this more meaningful rant

Nathan Human (not that you could prove it)

Internet censorship has been widely protested by Australians on the internet for some time. The idea that one can use the internet to compromise the status quo is a myth perpetuated since the technologies onset to garnish the illusion of democracy. Even if Australia hadnt censored the internet, what progressive social change has come by way of the internet anyway? What (if any) pittance of liberty and freedumb has been salvaged using this lipid breeding physical trap that has actually significantally increased social progress asides from organizing protests which conveniently get broken up by the authorities who use it to monitor every thing you do?

NOTHING. Facebook groups with 2 million members cant even convince the social monitoring service to give them colored profiles much less stop a fucking war. Dont give me that "it makes people more aware BS"!!! It makes them think they are more aware. Thats its role. AND EVEN IF IT DID MAKE PEOPLE MORE AWARE WHAT HAS THAT AMOUNTED TO IN THE REAL WORLD? Let me do the tally for a second here...
...
...
...

Ok I've got it!!!!

=SWEET FUCK ALL!!! IN FACT... LOOKS LIKE WERE IN THE NEGATIVE!!!

The global injustices that we have attempted to remedy using the internet have only worsened since its inception... exponentially. Wealth discrepancies the world over are as wide as ever, imperialism continues undeterred and in many cases it has accelerated, police state crackdowns, banking fraud, corporate greed, they all have increased. Everything that should be better has gotten worse!!!

NOTHING has been done asides from getting people scared shitless of the shadowy powers that be, while subtley acclimatizing them to the ideology of these very people... Getting them used to the idea... They sold us the illusion of internet freedom, they perpetuated this myth with their independent media shills, who constantly remind us that the internet is empowering the lower classes. How could we have been so foolish? It isnt empowering, it is controlling. Now people are going to waste their time challenging the Australian legislation using the same medium of communication that couldnt prevent it from taking shape in the first place!!!

Its sad and funny, but only if your cynically optimistic and realize that your a monkey sitting in front of a machine who will die someday like everything else on this rock for the past billion years, SO LIVE!!!! LIVE!!! LIVE!!! WHILE YOU CAN!!! CAN!!! CAN!!!

Another meaningless debate this is indeed. One after another they throw us a bone to fight over, like a bullshit factory, and demand is higher than ever. When will people fucking realize what hegemony really is? I mean really. Look up the definition, apply it in FULL.

There hasnt been a revolution or anything significant done using the internet, and there never will be. So long as we are to rely on the oppressors medium of communication we will be the underdogs. The internet was invented by the US military. Enough said. Seriously, think long and hard about that. Why did it take 20 years to go public? Because THEY WERE PREPARING IT FOR >>>US<<<

Granted the internet has enabled me to meet a few people and in exchange I have merely conceded a hefty portion of my life sitting in front of this fkn screen scratching my balls!!! Wow what a trade off!!!

Now you may be thinking... dude your writing this shit on the internet and I am reading it, so it clearly must be good for something?

If you have found this website, you are an anomalie to say the least, likely within my ring of friends and aquaintances if not linked here by one of them. What has this website accomplished? Fuck all, why should I bullshit you? Sure I may have confused the fuck out of some people, maybe even prompted more critical thought, but its also been more of a hindrance to my own personal street level activist potential and hasnt done much for the real world pragmatically speaking. Fadsmashers wont bullshit you. Its part of the problem in some ways and has no vested interest in keeping this a secret like that other fancy curved cornered BS we are so quick to uncritically consume.

PEOPLE... (especially those who will never read this page). ITS ALL A SHOW. EVERY DEBATE. EVERY ISSUE. EVERY CONTRAVERSY IS MANUFACTURED. THERE IS NO GOOD OR BAD SIDE TO THEIR DEBATES. ITS ALL BAD, AND ALWAYS WILL BE UNTIL WE COLLECTIVELY RECOGNIZE THE DECEPTION, ANYTHING POPULAR THAT PRESENTS ITSELF AS ANTI-ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN A SOCIETY DOMINATED VIA TECHNOPOLY, OLIGARCHY AND HEGEMONY IS INAUTHENTIC: NOT TRUE. 

IT IS NOT, I REPEAT, NOT TRUE.

ITS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BULLSHIT<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<.

If fadsmashers ever became popular it will have become insincere and will have switched sides. Thats all there is too it. Thus, and as uttered when I began this website, once fadsmashers becomes a fad, it will have self destructed. The first advertisment or political endorsement placed on any webpage will be that pages event horizon of dishonesty. ITS REALITY.

IF THEY ARE SAYING THE INTERNET IS THE MOST POWERFUL BASTION OF FREE SPEECH, IT MEANS IT WAS THE DEATH OF FREE SPEECH.

WAR IS PEACE.

MOTHERFUCKERS.

-Nathan fkn Human







Australian Gov't Approves Internet Censorship Plan

• by Bill Lindner on 20091218 @ 10:36AM EST | google it | send to friends
• Filed under Government | (related terms: internet, google, australia, filtering, top-secret list)

google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad); google_protectAndRun("ads_core.google_render_ad", google_handleError, google_render_ad); Australia's federal government has announced that it is proceeding with controversial plans to censor the Internet after government-commissioned trials found that using a blacklist of banned sites was accurate and would not slow down web use.

Critics, including Google, Electronic Frontiers Australia and Greens communications argue that the censorship policy is fundamentally flawed and the trial results are not surprising.

Stephen Conroy, Australia's Communications Minister, will introduce legislation just before next year's elections designed to force ISPs to block a blacklist of refused classification, or "RC" websites for all Australians using the Internet.

What will be Blocked? The blacklist would be comprised of material that includes illicit child photos, violence and other criminal activity and would be compiled using complaints from the public, government censors and URLs that are provided internationally.

It's unknown what specifically would be blocked and who decides the fate of web sites. What is known is that such blocking will not reduce performance: results of ISP-level Internet studies found that blocking banned material "can be done with 100 percent accuracy and negligible impact on Internet speed." (Source: com.au)

Read More