Nanoblogging

This is a clever little diddy ado with big brothers attempts to maximize communication while minimizing the depth of that communication to a set amount of meaningless characters. In spite of the fact that this is entirely fictional, for anyone familiar with the concept of Orwellian newspeak the moral of the story should be clear.

Big Brother 101

A course geared toward understanding the psycho-social implications of using a internet communication for the purpose of social control? Or a shitty course in how to sell people shit while using these mediums? You guessed it!

The real Wikipedia

What does this mean? Quite simply that there is in fact a real wikipedia that exists, and you aint entitled to that shit son!

Recently substantial changes have been made to wikipedias online (up until now open) encyclopedic platforms submission screening process. Sorry about that pretentious sentence. Anyways, what at once was a hub for the  circulation of information has now been formally instated as big brothers first line of defense from inquiring minds. Asides from now blacklisting whichever sites it chooses (the ones cited for information), the company is now establishing a system of centralized command, in which high level editors will have the final say on what surfaces on the site. Prior to this, this was done (allegedly) solely by the public, who through dialogue were able to make highly informative and relatively concise entries into the site (although still by and large representative of the status quo). This is the same agency who still considers the New World Order concept to be a conspiracy in spite of the numerous references to it in the last few weeks by mainstream media.

FOR EXAMPLE:
Wikipedia explains anything which runs counter to officiated narratives of events are a liability in terms those explanations capacity for 'producerist demagogy' an interesting neologism created by someone with the right to create words that goes a little something like this:

'refers to a syncretic ideology of populist economic nationalism which holds that the productive forces of society - the ordinary worker, the small businessman, and the entrepreneur, are being held back by parasitical elements at both the top and bottom of the social structure.'

Oh right, you mean the ones at the 'top' that own everything!!! No reason to be at all suspicious of the goings on in areas we are completely alienated from! Better just STFU and decieve ourselves into thinking we are paranoid, hate stuffed losers who simply have nothing better to do; like selling out, or buying in.

Among the more negative connotations given to the New World Order infatuation, Wik indicates that it is a gateway into National Libertarian Socialism, and other extremist political stances, which in many respects is a risk indeed. Some  conspiracy theorists are closet elitists with their own set of subjectively charged dictums for how the world should be run. However the large majority of these people (conspiracy empiricists) who recognize societal parisitism are in fact sympathetic to the oppressed (the bottom) in their societies, and this is the quintessential difference that seperates a legitimate conspiracy empiricist, from a venture shock jock capitalist. The latter shows equal remorse to victims of the system as it does resentment towards the elitist perpetrators, and understands the sociohistorical progression of events that spawed the growth of these social maladies. So the association with NWO critics as hate filled aspiring elitists discredit those whose only concern is the leeches at the top, that DO seek to hold us all back. Its called fucking capitalism, you shilling info whores.

Its not even so much that information is actually suppressed but its how its indexed... The bottom line is that Wikipedia, google, Yahoo answers and the like work together to reinforce social conventions and shape public opinion. No matter what you google comes up as a wik link,  or a yahoo answer, trailed by 1 billion results that are considered less worthy of your attention. THINK about it.

Dont share, compete

If we don't buy artists albums, and indoctrinating movies then how will these people ever get filthy rich and arrogant self-important enough to be the envy of us all?  Will they still have the motivation to make more shitty music tuned to the reptilian brain?