FROM THE NEW SCIENTIST The cyberweapon that could take down the internet A new cyberweapon could take down the entire internet – and there's not much that current defences can do to stop it. So say Max Schuchard at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis and his colleagues, the masterminds who have created the digital ordnance. But thankfully they have no intention of destroying the net just yet. Instead, they are suggesting improvements to its defences. Schuchard's new attack pits the structure of the internet against itself. Hundreds of connection points in the net fall offline every minute, but we don't notice because the net routes around them. It can do this because the smaller networks that make up the internet, known as autonomous systems, communicate with each other through routers. When a communication path changes, nearby routers inform their neighbours through a system known as the border gateway protocol (BGP). These routers inform other neighbours in turn, eventually spreading knowledge of the new path throughout the internet. A previously discovered method of attack, dubbed ZMW – after its three creators Zhang, Mao and Wang, researchers in the US who came up with their version four years ago – disrupts the connection between two routers by interfering with BGP to make it appear that the link is offline. Schuchard and colleagues worked out how to spread this disruption to the entire internet and simulated its effects. Surgical strike The attack requires a large botnet – a network of computers infected with software that allows them to be externally controlled: Schuchard reckons 250,000 such machines would be enough to take down the internet. Botnets are often used to perform distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which bring web servers down by overloading them with traffic, but this new line of attack is different. "Normal DDoS is a hammer; this is more of a scalpel," says Schuchard. "If you cut in the wrong places then the attack won't work." An attacker deploying the Schuchard cyberweapon would send traffic between computers in their botnet to build a map of the paths between them. Then they would identify a link common to many different paths and launch a ZMW attack to bring it down. Neighbouring routers would respond by sending out BGP updates to reroute traffic elsewhere. A short time later, the two sundered routers would reconnect and send out their own BGP updates, upon which attack traffic would start flowing in again, causing them to disconnect once more. This cycle would repeat, with the single breaking and reforming link sending out waves of BGP updates to every router on the internet. Eventually each router in the world would be receiving more updates than it could handle – after 20 minutes of attacking, a queue requiring 100 minutes of processing would have built up. Clearly, that's a problem. "Routers under extreme computational load tend to do funny things," says Schuchard. With every router in the world preoccupied, natural routing outages wouldn't be fixed, and eventually the internet would be so full of holes that communication would become impossible. Shuchard thinks it would take days to recover. "Once this attack got launched, it wouldn't be solved by technical means, but by network operators actually talking to each other," he says. Each autonomous system would have to be taken down and rebooted to clear the BGP backlog. READ MORE THE MOSCOW NEWS Russia to splash out billions on anti-diving device by Andy Potts at 11/02/2011 Once upon a time diving was just an ordinary Olympic sport – but when Sochi hosts the 2014 winter games there will be a sinister new focus on underwater antics. Such are the fears of sub-aqua saboteurs that Russia is about to spend 14 billion roubles ($476 million) on a special “crustacean” weapon to painlessly disperse frogmen from the beaches of the Black Sea. But maritime Spetsnaz officers may not have much luck with attempts to use hi-tech sonar pulses to thwart unwanted guests – many experts have dismissed the plans as unworkable and unjustified. Safety first The plan is to commission an underwater weapon which sends a targeted shockwave towards any suspect intruders as they swim to shore. From a distance of 80 metres, saboteurs would be hit with a force equivalent to 15 atmospheres, generated by sonar pulses. If the devices operated out of the water, the sound waves would be at around 215 dB, gzt.ru reported. Effectively, therefore, the device is a giant megaphone conditioned to send powerful ripples through water rather than amplify noise through the air. And it is hoped that this will be safer than the current “best practice” of launching grenades at renegade divers. Why bother? There are growing fears that terrorists could use divers to prepare an attack on a major event like the winter Olympics. And sabotage swimmers have been blamed by some for the destruction of the warship Novorossiysk in 1955 in one of the most famous Soviet maritime mysteries. More recently, the Philippines’ military claimed in 2005 that it had evidence that South-East Asian terrorist groups with links to Al Qaeda were planning scuba divers for attacks at sea. READ MORE FROM DEFENSE REVIEW P3 Strafer MK4 Mod 0 Less-Lethal Machine Gun/Weapon System On February 23, 2009, in Less-Lethal Systems, by David CraneBy David Crane All photographic images contained in this article were taken by DefenseReview.com, and are the exclusive property of DefenseReview.com. DefenseReview.com owns the copyright on these photos. All photos were shot with an Olympus Stylus 790 SW 7.1-megapixel digital camera, which is advertised as "shock + waterproof". February 24, 2009 This thing’s got "riot control" written all over it. If you’ve got a G8 summit meeting or some other globalization or symbol-of-government-authority-and-control event coming to your town, and you’re worried about the usual contingent of crazy, violent rock-and-molotov-cocktail-throwing leftist/anarchist rioters, the appropriately-named Strafer MK4 MOD 0 CO2-powered less-lethal weapon system/machine gun (airsoft-type) firing .177/4.5mm or 6mm polymer BBs at 250-625 FPS (Feet Per Second) and 9,000-10,500 RPM (Rounds Per Minute–which translates to 150-175 rounds per second–out of a 7,200-96,000-round hopper might just be the ticket for ya’. And, you can effectively engage those little whipper-snappers from a distance of 75 yards. The Strafer’s maximum engagement range is 125 yards. Manufactured by Piper’s Precision Products (P3 a.k.a. PPP) and marketed by X-Caliber Tactical, the… Strafer MK4 Mod0 less-lethal weapon system is a sadist’s dream come true, and potentially dangerous in the wrong individual’s hands, sopolice departments may want to be careful in their choices of recipients. Psychological testing and some Taser-style sensitivity training (where anyone who uses the Strafer has to first be shot with it themselves) may not be a bad idea. TheStrafer video X-Caliber Tactical was playing at it’s booth at SHOT Show 2009 showed footage of this very thing, where LEO (Law Enforcement Officer) test subjects took some shots from the Strafer to the backs of their legs, and it didn’t look like a pleasant experience, judging by the way said LEOs were hopping around and whining in pain and generally acting like little girls after they got "Strafed". Wussies. Kidding. I, no doubt, would have reacted in similar fashion if I’d taken a hail of high-velocity plastic BBs in the legs from the Strafer. But, then again, I wouldn’t have been stupid enough to volunteer to get shot with it in the first place. That’s why God gave you a brain, so you’ll hopefully be smart enough not to volunteer to get shot, Tasered (or is it Tased?), etc. READ MORE Rave reviews at robotic robot-roaster raygun rollout US Navy in hot, wet droid-on-droid blaster action By Lewis Page There's big news from the world of rayguns this week, as the US Navy has announced successful use of a laser cannon fitted to its well-known "R2-D2" robotic gun turret installation to shoot down other, flying robots in a test. Shark-portability issues continue to dog the technology's entry into the supervillainry sector. The hot robot-on-robot raygun action took place at San Nicolas Island off the coast of California on 24 May, according to the US Naval Sea Systems command (NAVSEA). Naval spokesmen added: This marks the first Detect-Thru-Engage laser shoot-down of a threat representative target in an over-the-water, combat representative scenario.Five other unmanned air vehicles have previously been burned down by what is known officially as the Laser Weapon System (LaWS). "The success of this effort validates the military utility of [rayguns] in a maritime environment. Further development and integration of increasingly more powerful lasers into Surface Navy LaWS will increase both the engagement range and target sets that can be successfully engaged and destroyed," said NAVSEA's Captain David Kiel. The LaWS is essentially a an extra option added to an existing "Phalanx" automatic 20mm cannon installation. Phalanx - occasionally known as the "R2-D2" among US sailors - can detect incoming threats such as guided missiles with its own radar, aim itself and blast the target out of the sky without input from human operators: the only control options normally available are to switch it on and off, or in some cases to adjust the minimum speed something must be going at before it is fired on. READ MORE Israelis flaunt hegemony with recreation of Nazi deathray (From Jan 19th) http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/19/israeli_sonic_cannon/ Israeli Zioborgs (From Jan 13th) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126325146524725387.html Fadsmashers would like to concede that apart from our desire to live in a weaponless utopia, things are not likely to change EVER, in fact the process will likely be expedited with a populous that is unarmed (irrespective of the thousands of deaths by guns every year in the USA) thus we are crossing fictitious and unnecessarily divisive party lines and embracing the second amendment. We had hoped that someday guns would be obsolete, that we would transcend our competitive nature and the oppressive monetary system which fuels it, but the fact is... The right to bear arms is essential to any society built on competition and other increasingly redundant darwinian mechanisms. Ultimately the desire to have guns flushed out of the system would be ideal, so long as there is no longer any need to protect oneself. When that need to protect oneself is no longer valid (when ruling elites are dethroned and no longer dominate any aspect of our lives), then and only then will the second amendment become redundant. | See all tech news here
|













RSS Feed