http://www.fadsmashers.com/19/post/2009/04/conficker-worm-will-destroy-your-life-unless-you-buy-the-upcoming-solution.html

This week conficker ran its doomsday scenario which will at worst wipe millions of hard drives and the mindnumbing multimedia they contain. But you can prevent this by allowing microsoft to "update" your PC anytime they want, in addition to possessing the latest in spyware, and anti-virus software, that you MUST update annually. For all you vista users who had a couple months of the platform actually working as its supposed to, you now can drag your ass back to the big box store to buy the latest version 'Windows 7'. Its likely it will take a couple years to correct all the bugs which is when we will release windows 8, it lets you resize pictures using your fingers!!!! NO FUCKING WAY!!!!

Be self-conscious

WARNING: Be conscientious in fashioning your online persona, your oppressive employer may be watching, just post links to mind numbing bullshit and dont dare use the internet while at home on a sick day. This is a message for all employers who seek to sleuth the profiles of potential applicants for signs of anything human to hold against them.

Meanwhile Britain plots its uber big brother computer that will keep records of EVERY digital transaction made by its slaves

Dont be decieved by the headline, the information will still be stored by the internet service provider, as it always has, regardless this trivial gesture will likely be enough to appease many...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1173870/Big-Brother-climbdown-Smith-does-U-turn-admitting-public-dont-want-huge-database.html

Facebook funny

What it has come to

Because we are a society conditioned to be completley dependent on the oppressive socio-techno apparatus, its no suprise that some would want to carry out this illusion of connectedness to our graves. Its bad enough they own us from cradle to grave, now even in death we fold to their oppressive grip. If you spent the majority of your remaining life glued to a fucking machine, then hey, why not make it permanent!

Their tube

Below is the new youtube homepage which looks more like mainstream news media website...

Facebooks philanthropy is to be financed by the 200 million people it knows better then they know themselves. If you haven't realized, the goal of this infernal software is to get everyone in the developed world hardwired to the grid for the purpose of efficiently weeding out anyone whoever had a unique idea, when the social atmosphere is right... The funny thing is this PR stunt couldn't have been more blatantly deceiving, what it should have read was "Facebook hits 200 million, and will encourage its users to buy 'digital gifts' (likely one of the highest profit margined commodities ever to exist) to fund its administrative costs". Facebook itself isn't contributing a dime, largely because they haven't devised a viable means of income other then their shadowy investors. *Picture of facebook in ten years.

Digg it, Reddit, Stumble it, connect it, link it, like it, FUCK it

Its safe to say the blogosphere, has to some effect, empowered people to circulate news and information and as such has yielded a new generation of outspoken and raging pseudo journalists like yours truly. However, it was only a matter of time before this required regulation so not to be a liability to the people that own everything and everyone. In response to this democratic exercise, venture capitalists embarked on a plan (like Google) to organize and classify this plethora of information into something palatable that is suited to a viewers interest, and by and large amendable to the status quo.

The premise is that with so much information being circulated its impossible for any individual to find what they are looking for, thus algorithms based on ones interests and past usage of the internet are used by the sites in question to determine what is relevant to your tastes. "Your tastes" as determined by someone else's software program.

In this way then web 2.0 was the death of the internet (which was dead on arrival anyway as its a product of the US military duh). No longer can something be viewed in its own right and guaranteed site accessibility on the basis of its content. Rather it now boils down to how many people "digg it" or "like it" or "link it" etc. If something doesn't have many diggs its safe to say that it isn't a worthy read, and will thus be buried by these websites, who can easily manipulate view counts, diggs, ratings of their content etc. Yes indeed, the ziosphere plays on our vulnerability to this digital plague of consensus validity, in that if some trolling other bloke didn't digg it, then why should I bother.

So be careful when swarming to something thats been "dugg" simply because its been dugg, its likely going to digg you a fucking ditch and disinformative on some level, because any authentically critical literature is easily tucked deep into the sands of digital history with the push of a reset button.

Non-oppressive Technology

Nanoblogging

This is a clever little diddy ado with big brothers attempts to maximize communication while minimizing the depth of that communication to a set amount of meaningless characters. In spite of the fact that this is entirely fictional, for anyone familiar with the concept of Orwellian newspeak the moral of the story should be clear.

Big Brother 101

A course geared toward understanding the psycho-social implications of using a internet communication for the purpose of social control? Or a shitty course in how to sell people shit while using these mediums? You guessed it!

The real Wikipedia

What does this mean? Quite simply that there is in fact a real wikipedia that exists, and you aint entitled to that shit son!

Recently substantial changes have been made to wikipedias online (up until now open) encyclopedic platforms submission screening process. Sorry about that pretentious sentence. Anyways, what at once was a hub for the  circulation of information has now been formally instated as big brothers first line of defense from inquiring minds. Asides from now blacklisting whichever sites it chooses (the ones cited for information), the company is now establishing a system of centralized command, in which high level editors will have the final say on what surfaces on the site. Prior to this, this was done (allegedly) solely by the public, who through dialogue were able to make highly informative and relatively concise entries into the site (although still by and large representative of the status quo). This is the same agency who still considers the New World Order concept to be a conspiracy in spite of the numerous references to it in the last few weeks by mainstream media.

FOR EXAMPLE:
Wikipedia explains anything which runs counter to officiated narratives of events are a liability in terms those explanations capacity for 'producerist demagogy' an interesting neologism created by someone with the right to create words that goes a little something like this:

'refers to a syncretic ideology of populist economic nationalism which holds that the productive forces of society - the ordinary worker, the small businessman, and the entrepreneur, are being held back by parasitical elements at both the top and bottom of the social structure.'

Oh right, you mean the ones at the 'top' that own everything!!! No reason to be at all suspicious of the goings on in areas we are completely alienated from! Better just STFU and decieve ourselves into thinking we are paranoid, hate stuffed losers who simply have nothing better to do; like selling out, or buying in.

Among the more negative connotations given to the New World Order infatuation, Wik indicates that it is a gateway into National Libertarian Socialism, and other extremist political stances, which in many respects is a risk indeed. Some  conspiracy theorists are closet elitists with their own set of subjectively charged dictums for how the world should be run. However the large majority of these people (conspiracy empiricists) who recognize societal parisitism are in fact sympathetic to the oppressed (the bottom) in their societies, and this is the quintessential difference that seperates a legitimate conspiracy empiricist, from a venture shock jock capitalist. The latter shows equal remorse to victims of the system as it does resentment towards the elitist perpetrators, and understands the sociohistorical progression of events that spawed the growth of these social maladies. So the association with NWO critics as hate filled aspiring elitists discredit those whose only concern is the leeches at the top, that DO seek to hold us all back. Its called fucking capitalism, you shilling info whores.

Its not even so much that information is actually suppressed but its how its indexed... The bottom line is that Wikipedia, google, Yahoo answers and the like work together to reinforce social conventions and shape public opinion. No matter what you google comes up as a wik link,  or a yahoo answer, trailed by 1 billion results that are considered less worthy of your attention. THINK about it.

Dont share, compete

If we don't buy artists albums, and indoctrinating movies then how will these people ever get filthy rich and arrogant self-important enough to be the envy of us all?  Will they still have the motivation to make more shitty music tuned to the reptilian brain?

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.