Humanistic fallacies

Words are used to control people. The notion of self has been instrumental towards this end. It will go down in history as the second greatest egocentric misnomer of all time, the first being the belief that the earth was the center of the universe.

1) That the goal of our existence is self-satisfaction, by way of self-expansion, and self-awareness.

1) WRONG!!! The self is inseparably tied to the outside world, in fact the only thing that separates "you" (a mental concept) from the environment (a mental concept) is your perception that you are a separate “thing”. It is not your fault that the receptor cells in your eyes are only privy to 5% of the environment and the 95% that connects you to it is missed. The space between the atoms and molecules that comprise your skin does not exceed the space between the oxygen that wraps it. The goal is awareness not of self, but of the opposite of self. Self is the basis of ego. What is mistakenly referred to as self-awareness, is actually cosmic awareness.

2) That you cannot change people.

1) WRONG!!! JUST LIKE THE CLIMATE OF THE EARTH, PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS CHANGING!!! This is a romantically charged and jaded notion evoked when an individual has realized how alienated they are from the means of social change and how difficult a task it will be to educate miseducated people, in the process they concede this responsibility to the powers that be, and carry on shopping and posing on Facebook. If you think people are independent, and that you cannot infect them with seeds of knowledge you probably don't think to highly of education!!!  Research the concept in perceptual psychology called "priming" (and this only deals with how people are changed by the environment around them, doesn't even get into all the ways in which people are intentionally influenced-which compounds into change).

It has no empirical basis, in fact, every major theory of psychology both empirically and theoretically debunks this overused (but poorly understood) layman’s proverb. It is selfish in that it puts human beings on a pedestal, it says that “humans (unlike animals) are so complex that no one can understand nor change them”, it assumes that human beings are so special and independent of the laws of physics that only the almighty "I" can be the basis of their causality.  You CAN influence, change and control people because they (we) are not that special, and it is mere wishful thinking, laziness and ego-projection that compels us to insist otherwise. Do not blame your inability to organize meaningfully on anything but your ineptitude in communicating with others.

3) The hierarchy of needs

That “self”-growth is a hierarchical process, and that ensuring the needs of others (empathy) is not among one of our primary needs. That is, humanism separates your needs from the needs of the collective.

The self (the body) grows in tandem with its environment, there is no such thing as true independence or “self”-growth, only collective growth. 

4) That you create your own reality

Indeed we integrate the culture we have acquired into our psycho-biological disposition, and on the basis of this formulate an understanding of the world. This is not to say that the laws of physics are altered in response to our beliefs. This may be the case on some quantum level, however even within this understanding, you exist in a dimension, which has its own character to which you must conform. The fact is you by and large do not create your own reality, it is comprised of the finite cultural niceties you have been given, to delude you into thinking you have some kind of choice. This is not to say that there is a "normal" to which we should all aspire to, indeed we must embrace our differences, so long as they do infringe on the common good of the collective. Indeed you add to the reality in a symbiotic sense, but to think that the intangible you is creating it is just another selfish manifestation of this poorly understood existential/ humanistic philosophy.

5) Freedumb

Indeed freedumb from tyranny and oppression (the freedom from the intent of others with more material power than you) is one thing, freedumb from this intricate interconnected web of sentience is a pipedream. It is species-ism. Considering corporations are people, you should think long and hard about what freedumb has in store for you in the long run.

Nathan Human April 11th 2010
The answer to the title is simple. We fear that which we do not know.

How many people go to work because they love their jobs?

How many copyrights were written to protect the interest of humanity?

How many loans are taken out of optimism?

How many are greedy because they fear others greed?

Over and over again, we see that the societal pyramid we have erected is strewn together with fear, it is its base component. Without it, the fictitious edifice of shit and lies would have no structural integrity. If you remove irrational (and intra-species) fear from the equation, we may have long since been on route to creating something other then beach side property on indigenous lands, likely beach side property on another planet. This is not to say that we should be naive to the fears and power of the wealthy people running this show, it just means not promoting a mindset that will benefit them in the long term.

What makes fadsmashers different?
Many of you read may read a lot of this sensationalist natter and may mistake it for being fear driven. The fact is I do not fear that the robots will take over the world (because they likely will and I can’t really do much about it other then arouse contempt in the minds of assholes and rejects who seem to think nothing could be better), fadsmashers is only oriented in this way because it’s how people have been conditioned to attend to information. The more shocking and hyperbolic the narrative, the more helplessly alluring it becomes. Such is the consequence of a three second attention span, quick fix planetary cluster fuck civility knit together with the blood of asian untouchables. People are trained to ingest shit, so every message must be sweetened to taste if only minutely. Most of the fear based alternative media as I have preciously discussed is actively willing the scenarios they profess to fear into existence.The collective hominid gangbang of the great mother is now encouraged by pharmaceuticals that permit us to fuck longer, faster and harder and serotonin re-uptake inhibitors ensure we pay no mind to the screams synchronized to our every mindless thrust.

The collective hominid gangbang of the great mother shall persist  unfettered with the aid of Viagra knock offs, de-empathizing EMF radition, and will be projected in HD on the bloodied iPads forced from Chinese sweatshops, it will be an unprotected and disease prone cluster fuck around, and give birth to nothing but an army of murderous cybernetic organisms who will exhaust our charred remains in earth friendly virgin galactic spaceship getaways to anywhere but here.

The market for fear
Capitalism is the material consequence of this irrational fear of those organic lifeforms who resemble us most: human beings. If the mark of the conscious self-aware beast is to fear his own brethren more than the cold world that waits to erode them to sand, then we have earned honors in this respect and should stand proud and erect on the corresponding bullshit podium of lies. Any alternative media that is selling fear whether its info"wars" or the like, it all creates the environment of unease for these problems to flourish.

Ears for fears
Human beings (particularly westerners) vicariously seek out information which makes them feel alive, because most have been deadened inside by years of eroding and minimizing their human spirit for the sake of not losing their shitty jobs, and superficial virtual acquaintances. I don't fear the rich scum who would like you to believe they are shapeshifting, occultists who have an intimate link with the dark side, that they are omnipotent and that their power structure is impervious to the organization of a highly committed smash prone group of individuals. I don't give a shit if the security personnel at the airport want to get their rocks off to millimeter wave porn, nor do I care if marketers know what I think and want to say me bullshit I will likely be forced to by anyway. I don’t fear having a chip put in me and big brother being privy to information they already can get via other means anyways. The goal of fadsmashers is to transcend this attitude of fear by saying "yes, we are all fucked and are working towards nothing as a species, isn't it funny how NO ONE CARES, isnt that fucking hilarious!!! LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!" its more effective in communicating the point  This method is useful in two ways. 1) It avoids fueling the fear fire, you won’t find advertisements for shit that will help you survive when shit hits the fan on this website, because ultimately it breeds the environment (THE DEMAND) for it to happen. Info-wars (a self-proclaimed libertarian anti-establishment website facilitates this fear and facilitates the move towards what it fears most simply by fearing it. This is how the NWO wll emerge from the same mentality that so staunchly resisted it. Fear perpetuates fear, perpetuates violence. Now this isn’t no pie in the sky theory either, clearly there is a very real aspect to what I am saying.  2) It does not seek to preach.  The main characteristic that discerns preaching from communicating is the attempt to evoke fear.

"It is OK to be afraid, its not OK to stay afraid"
Native American spiritualist

So what is the solution? How do we correct the gross inequities of the modern day without replacing it with more of the same?
We can start by laughing at those who tell us to fear it and by T-shirts that reiterate how much we fear it.

So rich people own everything and you misconstrue freedumb for the choice between engineered options.

Day in and day out. Until you are dead.

As I descend into the lonely uncharted territory self-reflection brings I need to constantly remind myself why I felt so compelled to initially indulge in this journey. When a person begins “waking up” they first realize the “reality” which knits what they have grown to critic and resolve with idealistic hollywood viewpoint is in fact a cold, harsh and existentially bound series of ideas and institutions headed by ruthless power hungry individuals you were told your whole life were your friends. When you begin this quest you may start by expressing your anger and dislike of the many unjust practices which require human suffering for their existence. You may want to “feed the starving people” and that in itself is enough (in your eyes) to devote your time and make sacrifices for a cause greater then yourself. Then you probe deeper and deeper still, you realize that it is not so simple as “the corporations vs humans”, you realize that you have been indoctrinated with a status quo affirming education and that your lexicon for challenging this oppression was developed there as well (Orwellian literature). You realize that the motive to “feed the starving children” will not suffice in motivating the brainwashed selfish masses to take the necessary action to dismantle the web of lies they have assembled and become dependent upon. You realize that these people have been trained to ingest information in a certain way, and that any enlightening must utilize (somehow) these neural conduits hollowed by mindfuk incorporated in order to communicate with them. Essentially, you have to dumb it down. 

So What the fuck am I trying to say?  

The more committed to fadsmashers I become the more its meaning becomes dissolved, I see myself doing it out of obligation more so then necessity (EVEN THOUGH ITS MORE NECESSARY NOW THEN EVER!!!), as is the natural progression of any artistic endeavor goes that gains an audience with demands, expectations and the need for some consistent approach. It’s like saying the same word over and over again until it loses all meaning. When it does lose meaning (for me), I feel compelled to transcend my old thinking and establish a new one that is more refined and concise. The problem is you end up straying so far from the shore that no one understands what the fuck you are talking about eventually. I seriously am skeptical of anyone who constantly touts the same old lines, posts the same old shit, for years on end, and doesn’t show any signs of an evolving opinion; those who seem to have become concretized in their ideology simply stopped thinking.

It’s not how long one has studied sociopolitics that is important; it’s how fast they progress through the stages.  I could easily keep my media within the confines of what is comprehensible by the people I am trying to enlighten, but I would not be being true to pursuit of virtue, justice, and honesty. This entails when we have it figured out, that we step back. For example: Just because Zionist influence (namely those of Jewish descent) seem to have every oppressive industry on lock down, it’s not enough to simply call these people out, as there is an agenda that is equally sinister that awaits taking its place, and will leech the efforts of anyone trying to do this towards its own ends. My critic of Zionism, is not an endorsement either directly and or indirectly for these halfwit trigger happy self-serving types who simply don’t trust the government and want to replace the ziosphere with their primitive ideology which ultimately only serves the needs of the wealthy capitalists assholes who fund the shock media that gets them in a economically viable scurry. Fadsmashers is more ethically and philosophically refined then that, in that we are honest and do not selectively bullshit ourselves whenever there is a pitfall to our ideology (which should be evolving). I also won’t say “fuck it” and won’t revert to nihilism or true cynicism (which entails not thinking you can change anything).

As a sidenote this is my declaration that I will never do "crazy shit", and if they say I did, they are full of shit.

I honestly and sincerely would like to make the world a better place to waste, I have no grande vision for how it should be (although I am working on it), and no ulterior motive asides from smashing and humiliating bullshit liars, their ideas and their lifestyles, humiliating the unquestioned lives of moral morons who are simply lead by the nose to any cause that seems worthy of a fight because they are bored out of their fucking minds, want some kind of moral balancing for being complicit. I have given up arguing with shitbrained selfish fox news viewers, instead I focus on those who watch Olbermann, and John Stewart because they mean well, but are as still brainwashed and complicit as the faux newstards they make a culture of criticizing. I honestly want an end to unjust human suffering, this requires that I teach people how to think critically, not teach them what to think.

If you still think its "all crazy conspiracy theories and stuffs" you are a brainwashed idiot who deserves it. You really do. I have no aspiration to save you.

I challenge you to think, and keep thinking, I challenge you to walk alone and really see it. If everyone is waving their fist at you, even your friends, then you are onto something DEEP. If not, you aint saying shit. Tragic indeed. But hip. Fucking hip.

The real status quotient 

It has come to my attention that there is no formula in existence to measure the intelligence of society as a whole. 

It is not enough to simply get all of the peoples IQ's and average them as that would only tell us half the story, it wouldn't say much for how these variables interacted to bring us this cutting edge ingenious civilization of failblogs, and haul videos.

This is not to say the IQ test is the end all and be all of intelligence measurement either, any good study would find a way to assess analytical ability, empathy and even creativity (not limited to problem solving) but for this colorful theoretical scenario we will assume that's all we need!!!

If one was to do this study, they would likely find that people with high IQ's are present anywhere across the class spectrum, or example they would find many instances were people with high IQ's worked for a wage for those with lower IQ's. In the big picture this will work itself out in backwards laws, corrupted values, environmental mismanagement and simply braindead blind conformist me-tards trying to change the system via social media that is owned and monitored by the people they so desperately want to change.

The best way to determine the collective intelligence of a society is by determining how many smart people are working for dumb people (NOT JUST BY HOW MANY SMART PEOPLE THERE ARE). So say you have an IQ of 140 and your boss touts 110, within this example there is a discrepancy of 30. Maybe your boss is smarter than his boss who only has an IQ of 90. Thus the total negative IQ discrepancy is 40 within this hire-archy. If this were done for everyone in society you could average those discrepancies to get a general number of how off that civilization is, or whether it should be considered one at all. 

If the sum total of all subordinate IQs is higher than the superordinates (or if sum of all hire-archies is in the negative) then you probably lived in a fucked up bullshit society that thinks its intelligent, free and meritocratic but it really isnt!!!! 

The overall legitimacy of a societies hire-archies will ultimately determine their potential for mere survival alone, transcending the Darwinian logic that got us here, will require something altogether different from hire-archy.

THE AMOUNT OF DISORDER WITHIN A CIVILIZATION IS PROPORTIONATE TO THE LEVEL OF INTELLIGENT PEOPLE WORKING FOR RETARDS. IT IS THE REAL STATUS QUOTIENT!!! 
.-Human

MORE ON THIS LATER!!!! 



Naytron Hominid