So rich people own everything and you misconstrue freedumb for the choice between engineered options.

Day in and day out. Until you are dead.

As I descend into the lonely uncharted territory self-reflection brings I need to constantly remind myself why I felt so compelled to initially indulge in this journey. When a person begins “waking up” they first realize the “reality” which knits what they have grown to critic and resolve with idealistic hollywood viewpoint is in fact a cold, harsh and existentially bound series of ideas and institutions headed by ruthless power hungry individuals you were told your whole life were your friends. When you begin this quest you may start by expressing your anger and dislike of the many unjust practices which require human suffering for their existence. You may want to “feed the starving people” and that in itself is enough (in your eyes) to devote your time and make sacrifices for a cause greater then yourself. Then you probe deeper and deeper still, you realize that it is not so simple as “the corporations vs humans”, you realize that you have been indoctrinated with a status quo affirming education and that your lexicon for challenging this oppression was developed there as well (Orwellian literature). You realize that the motive to “feed the starving children” will not suffice in motivating the brainwashed selfish masses to take the necessary action to dismantle the web of lies they have assembled and become dependent upon. You realize that these people have been trained to ingest information in a certain way, and that any enlightening must utilize (somehow) these neural conduits hollowed by mindfuk incorporated in order to communicate with them. Essentially, you have to dumb it down. 

So What the fuck am I trying to say?  

The more committed to fadsmashers I become the more its meaning becomes dissolved, I see myself doing it out of obligation more so then necessity (EVEN THOUGH ITS MORE NECESSARY NOW THEN EVER!!!), as is the natural progression of any artistic endeavor goes that gains an audience with demands, expectations and the need for some consistent approach. It’s like saying the same word over and over again until it loses all meaning. When it does lose meaning (for me), I feel compelled to transcend my old thinking and establish a new one that is more refined and concise. The problem is you end up straying so far from the shore that no one understands what the fuck you are talking about eventually. I seriously am skeptical of anyone who constantly touts the same old lines, posts the same old shit, for years on end, and doesn’t show any signs of an evolving opinion; those who seem to have become concretized in their ideology simply stopped thinking.

It’s not how long one has studied sociopolitics that is important; it’s how fast they progress through the stages.  I could easily keep my media within the confines of what is comprehensible by the people I am trying to enlighten, but I would not be being true to pursuit of virtue, justice, and honesty. This entails when we have it figured out, that we step back. For example: Just because Zionist influence (namely those of Jewish descent) seem to have every oppressive industry on lock down, it’s not enough to simply call these people out, as there is an agenda that is equally sinister that awaits taking its place, and will leech the efforts of anyone trying to do this towards its own ends. My critic of Zionism, is not an endorsement either directly and or indirectly for these halfwit trigger happy self-serving types who simply don’t trust the government and want to replace the ziosphere with their primitive ideology which ultimately only serves the needs of the wealthy capitalists assholes who fund the shock media that gets them in a economically viable scurry. Fadsmashers is more ethically and philosophically refined then that, in that we are honest and do not selectively bullshit ourselves whenever there is a pitfall to our ideology (which should be evolving). I also won’t say “fuck it” and won’t revert to nihilism or true cynicism (which entails not thinking you can change anything).

As a sidenote this is my declaration that I will never do "crazy shit", and if they say I did, they are full of shit.

I honestly and sincerely would like to make the world a better place to waste, I have no grande vision for how it should be (although I am working on it), and no ulterior motive asides from smashing and humiliating bullshit liars, their ideas and their lifestyles, humiliating the unquestioned lives of moral morons who are simply lead by the nose to any cause that seems worthy of a fight because they are bored out of their fucking minds, want some kind of moral balancing for being complicit. I have given up arguing with shitbrained selfish fox news viewers, instead I focus on those who watch Olbermann, and John Stewart because they mean well, but are as still brainwashed and complicit as the faux newstards they make a culture of criticizing. I honestly want an end to unjust human suffering, this requires that I teach people how to think critically, not teach them what to think.

If you still think its "all crazy conspiracy theories and stuffs" you are a brainwashed idiot who deserves it. You really do. I have no aspiration to save you.

I challenge you to think, and keep thinking, I challenge you to walk alone and really see it. If everyone is waving their fist at you, even your friends, then you are onto something DEEP. If not, you aint saying shit. Tragic indeed. But hip. Fucking hip.

November 30th 2009

(Above) Michio Kaku reiterates the Kardashev scale

-Earth, Star System
By Nathan Human

Occasionally we get so wound up in the mundane world of human affairs that we forget our context, even the most philosophically occupied among us still succomb to the fabrications of the sensory.

A few points of significance

Right NOW we are on what we call  a "rock" that is but one in a series of rocks spinning around other rocks which themselves are traversing through what appears to be unending abyss of "blackness" at speeds that cannot be comprehended by our ground bound organic mass. I personally have no idea as to what is going on here, quite frankly "I" dont know enough about the "I" to trust in its curiosity, much less its findings...

I am a collection of cells that would appear to be typing words on a screen that will eventually be read by the two other sacks of cells known as my "readers".

The fact that this isnt on the news, and that we have become so accustomed and exhausted of musing over our own existence is WHY the world is plagued by so many inequities. You really have to think about this picture, and not in a religous or spiritual way (as the notion of spirit is equally subjective). Actually dont think about it, visualize it. Visualize your place in that which you refer to be the universe. Dont just think about it as you and the stars, and all that hollywood nonsense that we have been conditioned to associate the contemplation of our existence with, really think about abrasive reality of what is really fucking happening RIGHT NOW. There is no stars, there is balls of fuel and raging infernos. There is no "you" there is the conversation between organ systems in a language you necessarily dont understand while allowing you to make your own. If everyone were to truly visualize their place in the cosmos, the world would be a more harmonious place. A persons understanding of the world, its complexity and sophistication is commensurate to their ability to percieve the context of their existence, their awareness of injustice and how easily they can be controlled.

YOU ARE HERE NOW. LIVING. BREATHING. YOUR EYES ARE WET. YOU DONT NOW WHY. SOON YOU WILL BE FRAIL. SOON YOU WILL BE DUST. THIS IS IMPORTANT.

It is a thought that can and should be evoked in our darkest, and more importantly our brightest hours. No matter how high a podium a human being stands on, that podium is indefinitely pegged into the foundation of the earth. So why then do we fight? Why then do we bother resisting corrupt governments and corporations? What is it in us that motivates us to challenge hegemony? It isnt a desire to be free, rather it is our inclination to homeostasis, balance, and justice.

I am not optimistic, nor is this a state that I feel should be aspired to. Optimism is preyed upon by opportunistic people, and the bulk of the former is naive and delusional anyway. I do believe however as I always have that transhumanism and "type 1 civilizations" are not something we should fear (i.e. planetary rule) but in fact aspire to... homeostatically. Michio Kaku explains the type one civilization as one which has mastered their environment, and shifted to a global political paradigm from a regional one. Unlike Michio Kaku (reknown scientist), I dont believe that we must blindly subscribe to any old "planetary civilization model" simply because its the one being offered, and because its our "destiny". If this world government that Kaku is trying to sell is so important to ensuring our survival, than it shouldnt require the many deceptions it has to be actualized (i.e. money, global warming, terrorism). If this truth Kaku entertains is so critical, then I am sure he would sooner it be achieved through diplomatic and as enlightened a means as possible, discluding the free for all of multinationals, oligarchs and banking cartels that would fashion this concentration of power with the same tools they used to chizzle out soveriegn dictatorships that spawned them. Yet he doesn't. He calls anyone who disagrees with G20 hegemony "terrorists", and anyone who is skeptical as ridden with fear (something he views in the negative except when he is fueling the fear for 2012).

Kakus unified civilization cannot arise using fear to coax people into buying into it, people have to first comprehend its importance, and not be tricked into the state of 'technopoly' in which we simply passively accept technology without considering the corrupt context from which it emerged. How can we ensure the integrity of this upcoming global society which will dictate our destiny as a species hereafter if we cannot even minimize corruption on a regional scale.

Can we at the same time have our motives for unification be ridden with fear while attempting to transcend the "problem> fear > solution" level of consiousness so pervasively used in nation building? If fear is what knitted the fabric of regional tyranny that blankets the sleeping world, what should we expect from a global patchwork utilizing the same seamstress? Its like the "green economy" movement and trying to mandate higher conscious behaviours (awareness of ones environment) using the lowest level of consciousness as a motivator (i.e. greed, money).

Freedom in the truest sense of the word entails universal bastardization. It entails a functionless excess, an unpredictable, chaotic, and subatomically boun disorder. In fact nothing is free, everything is sandwiched between something else. Freedom is an illusion. Freedom in its realist form is a nightmare, and is physically impossible.

The fact is freedom is unattainable, whereas Justice and balance are. Therefore I am changing the "freedumb movement" to the "justice movement". To the avail of no one, but these zeros and ones and zeros and ones....

Kaku uses fear to warrant the NWO, the same tactic practiced by the terrorists he claims "hate our tolerance". Like most scientists woven into the academic complex he is a pragmatic genius who is fundamentally and philosophically wrong.