This just in 44% of Americans would like Bush back... and 44% of Americans are fucking borderline retards who are never, ever ever ever going to figure out whats actually going on...

By Nathan Human

Every where you go you here the same old line... "too big to fail" they say, when talking about the American (!) dominated (private operated) global financial system.

Too big to fail they say when talking about Americas imperialist might ...

Too big to fail they say when reminding us of Obamas charistma, his global acclaim and the endurance of his puppeteers.

Too big to fail they say are the insatiable obeasts who's self hate fuels the profit driven medical industry, and the aesthethically devoid existence of mongoloid human beings... Too big to fail they say when talking about big macs, fat stacks, loaded gats and superized 50 inch plasma TV flats... Too big to fail they say, when talking about the resolve of the American people, the dissolve of the American sheeple and the perseverance with which they overcome whatever contrived roadblock and/or fictitious organization (or critical thought) lies between them and the unending task of accumulating goods to carry with them to the afterlife after exhausting their lives in jobs they protested for but hate...

Now we hear that Obamas popularity is plummeting? OH DEAR GOD!!! WHAT A SHOCKER!!! THIS MUST MEAN THAT... PEOPLE ARE WAKING UP... THAT THE REAL REVOLUTION IS COMING... THAT PEOPLE ARE PIERCING THROUGH THE POLITICAL FASCADE IN SEARCH OF SOMETHING MORE THAN JUST A SYMBOLIC FIGUREHEAD OR MAYBE...

IT IS PART OF THE PROGRAM.

Obamas notoriety at a new high
Why is Obamas popularity plummeting? Who is telling us his popularity is dropping? What would motivate people to change their views so drastically? Is it because people are starting to see through the omnipresent deceptions of politics and are ready to actually embrace a new level of civilization, and new and improved (evolved) ways of thinking? Or is it that the majority of these people are motivated by base level selfish emotions (fear, greed, anger) and are actually just too dumb to see through the tricks used in leading questionnaires used by gallop polls, much less EVER applying their knowledge of the clandestine powers that be in full and in fairness. The people who are telling you that his popularity is plummeting (ZIOVISION) are the same people who are NOT telling you that the world is run by a handful of people who are out to secure their own best interest nor are they assisting the resistance to this in any way thats beyond trivial or beyond mere entertainment. They are the same people who told you to vote for him (through a machine made in Israel). Secondly, its politics, either you say fuck corporate spun politics or you forever cling to the false sense of 'hope' that you have been unconsiously conditioned to conjure up in times of need, and keep criticizing frontmen for not getting shot so that you dont have to pay taxes and intrest to private lenders. Keep pretending that the next one will be better and that voting machines made in Israel will permit you to effectively do so. IF YOU BELIEVE WHAT ALEX JONES SAYS ABOUT THE OBAMA DECEPTION, BE SURE TO APPLY THAT SAME REASONING TO EVERY OTHER PATSI THEY THROW YOUR WAY ESPECIALLY IF ALEX JONES RECOMMENDS THEM!!! In fact ask yourself why a person who is so outspoken in their condemnation of the mainstream media would selectively and uncritically endorse their viewpoint at times... Either you think they are full of shit or you dont, there is no two ways about it Alex, unless your full of shit then anything is possible!!!!

The same people who control the phoney polls are the same people who control the media. THEY WANT Obama to appear unpopular, this method of control implies that the majority of Americans have yet to transcend the hegelian dialectic which it would appear keeps reproducing itself in more sophisticated forms. Obamas downfall is being engineered because they need a society divided right down the middle. Once he starts going below 40, they will bring it up again, whilst offering another solution, because there always needs to be a dead heat to the finish, because like sports, even though we know its fake, we still feel inclined to cheer for the puppet that we identify with whether it be Obama, McCain or the Ron Paul cultus, THEY ARE ALL THE SAME, ANYONE TELLING YOU OTHERWISE WILL ASK YOU FOR MONEY SOON THEREAFTER. I GARAN-FKN-TEE IT.

Hope has been hijacked yet again and this time its being towed by the diminishing middle class who could give a fuck about anything but the profit margins of their own investments. We should not have hope that those who created the problems will remedy them (that an Obama replacement will yield anything different), this is to merely HOPE to buy more time before shit inevitably and ever so incrementally hits the fan in full fledged 3D, rather we should hope that people remember WHO they are, and come to harness their own personal power. I MEANT TO SAY REMEMBER WHAT THEY ARE. The "who" is a word deeply woven into the selfish capitalist framework, in that to say "who" am I, assumes that "I" is somehow beyond "what"... did you get that? If not who (WHAT) gives a piping hot fuck anyways!

We should hope that we can collectively gaze into the night sky and in unison revel in the mystery of what we do not know... We should only exhaust our resolve on the hopes that they (the masses) will come to KNOW what they do not know, and in the process come to know the most fundamental of all things that they KNOW nothing. That they, with their day jobs, new car, new cell phone applications, rings of friends, likes and dislikes, their looks and so on are all cultural fabrications that have absolutley nothing to do with our true destiny within the cosmos. Hopefully we can come to see that we are an inconstant cellular mass, changing and expanding like the universe... That we can never anchor ourselves in some idea, or we left behind in the endless expansiveness of the universe... this is reality.

At first glance the untrained eye would presume that because the hope Obama inspired has not been matched in any practical respect, that our disdain for this politician will amount to anything more than the same old shit. Everyone is acting so suprised that a politician didnt do what they said they would, without giving second thought to the fact that he is a fabrication, that the media who is telling you his popularity is plummeting is apart of that fabrication, and that Obama taking the fall and prompting the dissolution of the US is exactley what they are hoping for. You dont pay them to make decisions, you pay them to lie. Why is it that people who know politics is a sham are persistently (perhaps only unconsiously) swayed by the medias bullshit polls? For example in the instance of Alex Jones, should he not be impartial to the fact that Obamas popularity being on the decline (considering his alleged towering over the phony left/right paradigm)? Of course he should. He doesnt because he is a faking, bullshit making, money taking, mind raping infowhoring shill who fabricates grand delusions and knits them to things in the real world to pollute grass roots initiatives and in effect fuel the hegelian dialectic he professes to condemn while practicing his own method of survivalism in building his nest egg off the backs of his viewers he would surely meet with a shotgun from the door of his bunker when his post-apocalyptic fantasy takes shape...


What will happen?
Here is what will happen, people are going to criticize Obama for a multitude of reasons ranging from the fact that he is black to the fact that he is a puppet for the global elite and blah blah... other people will counter and say they are doing this mainly because he is black (which many are... no I am serious its hardly moitivated by "something greater" and the only thing that resembles 1776 is the fact that a black dude is at the center of the contraversy, something most Americans are accustomed to condemning). All of the enlightened criticisms of Obama will be swept up with all these bullshit criticisms (like hes a muslim, I mean seriously, what if he was, what if he fucking was... what does that say about the status of the separation of church and state in America and blah blah blah I like talking to myself). When the Obamanites respond (note I used Obama-NITE, not Obama-NOID, as conservatives do; to conflate it with negroid/ android/ mongoloid  and not " ite" like luddite or even .... semite etc) they will reject all of the enlightened criticisms of Obama under the suspicion that they may be racist, then the enlightened ones will say oh "their they go playing the racist card those stupid sheep", and then the Obamanites will act suprised to a point in which the enlightened (pseudo enlightened) actually start to hate them, and after they lash out in anger the Obamanites will call them hate filled racists, many of the enlightened then (for lack of easier option) will effectively BECOME hatefilled racists, never understanding the implications of their calling people "bitch sheep" and its Zionaziesque level of thinking. Now dont get me wrong, when one reaches a certain level of understanding the corruption which knits the big lie, its a coping mechanism to make fun of the people who think you are crazy for questioning the world around you, nonetheless it is at a lower level of cognition then empathizing with their buttfuck idiocy and the environment which reared it.

If America goes to the polls again with that same old rekindled sense of hope that has been exploited countless times before, Fadsmashers is going to quit, and because I know they will, I am already planning my extended vacation. The profound self-deception required to even entertain the notion that you are going to get ANYTHING worthwhile via the long since sold out political system and the act of voting is probably a good idea, because the fact is a people who are incapable of realizing the magnitude of deception in the modern day, would surely be incapable of governing themselves. Call it what you will... Zionaziesque thinking perhaps, but for all practical purposes I have lost faith in those that have blind faith and perhaps its our dependence on their awakening is exactley what the oligarchs want...

So when you hear that Obamas popularity is slipping, remember how its just another level of the game...

- Human December 2nd 2009
The following is a response I received from a fellow smasher, I found it to be an insightful exchange as much as we disagree about some of the details. His comments are unformated whereas mine are bolded (not that this means my comments are any bolder!!!). This wasnt the actual dialogue but their email with my added comments as well as an email response sent to them by me.

-Nhuman wrote
Hey man, I have been meaning to get back to ya, pardon the delay, just been uber busy with a whole bunch of shit, as far as the whole climate discourse I am not entirely sure how it will play out or what the implications are of its agreements for the global peasantry, although you seem to be onto something! Honestly the climate emails thing wont get much coverage, asides from a few blurbs in the back pages of major periodicals, it likely wont put a dent in the process. They want to take down the USA, any info that fuels their phony debates (i.e. climate change) are a good thing. Its like the god debate, with people channeling all their energy into either defending or challenging something which may not even exist, just another human construct directing peoples attention away from the cabals that be runnin this show. So long as the debate isnt on suppressed tech, nor real environmental issues, or whos in charge they are quite content with anything that keeps people divided.

Truthtweaker wrote:
I have to disagree with you. They don't want to take down the U.S.A., they've (City of London Corporation i.e. THE Bankers = Hedge Funds) have owned the U.S.A. via the District of Columbia for well over 100 years.  Nor do I think they want to 'equalize' wealth as is described in the Cop Treaty.  To do so would undermine a lot of cozy cash cow day-traders.  What they do want to do is create more scarcity, and more flux.  By those two means they can acquire more Capital, ensure less risk for themselves, and consolidate power.  What it boils down to in the End is that these people (lets call them ‘Them’...awe hell here they are: Kissinger, Volcker, Maurice Strong, Gyllenhammar, Viscount Davignon, Rockefeller, Gianni Agnelli, Cisneros, Jacob and Evelyn Rothschild, Desmarais & Sons, George Shultz, Otto Habsburg, Philip Mountbatten, Brzezinski).  These people DO believe they are working for the best interests of humanity, and the world as a whole.  Now I am in no way defending them by this next statement, but when you're born into the world these people are, and you operate at the level they do, you often miss what the effects of the decisions you make have on the ground level.  Like them I believe the ends do justify the means, but I also believe they're doing it wrong. 

I completely disagree with the concept of the ends justifying the means, for the simple fact that there is no known end".  We can assume that those in power actually have the end of world peace in mind, and on top of that we can presume that world peace is obtainable through coercive means. The logic of the matter dictates that peace cannot be brought through force; you cannot FORCE people to agree, for at some point inevitably they will resist.

Municipal power, not global power will be key to humanities best interests in the future.  These men are working towards a dream, but have failed to acknowledge that that dream is outdated, just as they themselves have become.  We no longer require a Saturnian figurehead to guide our actions, or engineer a societal structure geared towards that dream of 'peace', while placating to the lowest common denominator to ensure we must.  This will in the end prove a catastrophic failure on their parts.  By eliminating ambition, pride, envy, want, and need, you may serve to suppress greed, but you suppress what truly makes us human, and gives us impetus for evolution.  Namely conflict.  Conflict is necessary, without it we will wither, just as we currently are in the western world.  When all happiness is satisfied, when all angst tranquilized, when all pain is neutralized we cease to learn, we become jaded, bored, apathetic, useless. 


There is no need to eliminate these emotional traits. We should take pride in others. We should envy the unknown, we should want and need knowledge, but we needn’t apply these to one another. These are TRUE post-human emotional states. In the spirit of Moses(!), though shall not covet... Conflict is as necessary as cooperation. Although countries may go to war, it would not have been possible without first cooperating. Some of the most profound scientific gains pondered and conjured throughout history have been made by individuals who have a passion for the arts, not envy for others. Look what happened to Adolf Hitler. We presume that its competition that gave us this standard of living we enjoy, however it is conflict which has stunted that standard of living. Every luxury we have reaped is owed to cooperation battling the adversity of the free market. And should we feel the need to resist something, should we feel the need to compete, we can compete with the stars, the comets on route to earth; we can compete with the vastness of space. This is life’s only enemy, and at the same time its mother.  

Their great legacy is not the utopia they believe will come about through all this strife, not the great balancing, a satiated placating of mans baser instincts, and controlled funnelling of aggression in meaningless wars in order to avert more serious catastrophes.  Their great legacy is the Simpsons, fox news, codex alimentarius, and people too blind dumb, numb, and without cum to unfuck themselves.

To presume that they are trying to avert more serious wars by prolonging the less damaging military industrial complex is the consequence of neo-Freudian/ bio-reductionist conditioning. There is no NEED to know a war is going on, or to cheer for a side, there is no need (particularly in light of newly developed virtual experiences) for catharsis to be enacted in this way through war. We are omnivores, not carnivores. Lions may feel an inclination to sink their teeth into something running, we however do not feel this urge.

They don't see that though.  They see the goal: World Peace.  And for that goal they must first reduce the world’s population by any means necessary (in order to ensure a copacetic standard of living for all i.e. just above enough)... overlooking the fact that by increasing the standard of living in an area it's proven within two generations to begin drastically decreasing the population.  Hence how this new 'apology tax' in the Cop treaty could be beneficial, but wasn't put there to this end, and won't function towards that goal. 

It is only assumed that they aspire to "world peace", yet any world peace earned through war will be ultimately suppressing and thus not actually peaceful.

Stealing from one poor fuck, and giving it to another poor fuck leaves you with two poorer fucks (which is the goal), except the former has the ability to garner more for both, instead of providing the later with the opportunity to do the same (This oversight might be a slim chance for revolution if people don't simply shudder, bitch, and then turn on the TV.) 

That money isn't going to the latter though; it's going to his boss.  Who in turn uses it to frantically attempt to buy more IMF bucks to bail his sorry ass out for crooking the original transaction that wound his people into debt to begin with? And if they ever get bailed out?  War is always there to make new losers in the race for more scarcity. 
They already own it all, they just want everything to be balanced in a controlled flux, organized under one overruling system that pumps the blood necessary for the appendage systems (the flux=multiple currencies, and geo-political-corporate zones/designations/persons).  They see this convoluted mess as a necessary illusion for their free-range people farms.  Never once thinking (as they're too blinded by the view they have to) that perhaps humanity cannot be balanced, cannot be 'perfect', or that perhaps it already in its own way is, or was before their tampering. That our beauty lies in our frailty, in our small prefrontal lobes, and overly large adrenal glands. That not ONE thing is beautiful, but ALL things. That pain is a teacher. That there is more than ONE truth, way, and that freedom is something that's acknowledged, inherent, not earned, or with-held.  Nature will find a way, either by giving them what they want in the form of a few left-over post-planned-catastrophe docile, impotent, lemmings soon to be replaced by a more aggressive, adaptable species, or by humanities baser instincts snapping to the surface and having one of us push that big red button to end it all. 

They won a long time ago, officially when they created DC.  Since then it's been testing, and restructuring.  I'm sorry to be so defeatist, but given how humanity is currently, compared to how it was prior to the first WW, for the most part, aside from the few thousand aberrations like ourselves.  It's just a matter of time before it all ends, or it's all Disney.  Our enemy Nathan is Omniscient, Omnipresent, and Omnipotent.  Our enemy controls currency.  Stopping currency won't stop them at this point.  They still have nukes, and nanotechnology.  No one's going to drop out, no one's going to say stop, and be heard. 

I just wish I wasn't one of the few who wanted to know enough to care, only to find out I shouldn't, and still care after the fact. 

We are at a point now where we can control our own evolution (and probably well beyond that as we approach the AI singularity). I do believe that it is our destiny to unify, it seems so intuitive as this is how natural processes arrange themselves. When a system becomes too complex an overarching order manifests to control and regulate it. BUT. The queen ant is ideally in service to the workers, not the other way around. We need a new world order, but not one plagued with greed and corruption, and I don’t believe that a true unified globe could establish itself with these primitive human motivations present, there will always be conflict so long as this is the method we use to bring peace.

I couldn't agree with you more, especially your point about the Queen Ant, that's what I was referring to when I stated Municipal Power, not Global power will be key to our future.  To elaborate, if we we're to reverse the pyramid as it stands currently, and have a unified Global Government at the base, and accord it the power to regulate trade etc, but limit its power to the weakest in our structure, following it with regionalized geo-cultural-environmental zones, and then Apexing our pyramid with municipal power we'd have a solid cooperative foundation that ensured communities could choose to regulate themselves how they saw fit within a global family.  A resource based economy would be ideal; a defense structure similar to what Switzerland currently possesses would provide optimum self-sufficient security.  The problem with this system lies in one municipality deciding "I'm going to nuke this fuck, and take his land because God told me it's mine."  Until our species can evolve beyond dogma, we'll never unify.  I don't see that happening anytime soon.  It's not that by having 'these', or 'those' particular things present, or eliminated that we will overcome our problems as a species.  Those are symptoms, and the solutions do not eliminate the problems.  The problem is human nature.  Let me know if you have a cure for fear, for wilful ignorance, for psychoses.  We're a predatory breed, and the majority of us would prefer a comfortable lie, over an uncomfortable truth.  Cure that, and you can save this ball of dirt.