November 30th 2009

(Above) Michio Kaku reiterates the Kardashev scale

-Earth, Star System
By Nathan Human

Occasionally we get so wound up in the mundane world of human affairs that we forget our context, even the most philosophically occupied among us still succomb to the fabrications of the sensory.

A few points of significance

Right NOW we are on what we call  a "rock" that is but one in a series of rocks spinning around other rocks which themselves are traversing through what appears to be unending abyss of "blackness" at speeds that cannot be comprehended by our ground bound organic mass. I personally have no idea as to what is going on here, quite frankly "I" dont know enough about the "I" to trust in its curiosity, much less its findings...

I am a collection of cells that would appear to be typing words on a screen that will eventually be read by the two other sacks of cells known as my "readers".

The fact that this isnt on the news, and that we have become so accustomed and exhausted of musing over our own existence is WHY the world is plagued by so many inequities. You really have to think about this picture, and not in a religous or spiritual way (as the notion of spirit is equally subjective). Actually dont think about it, visualize it. Visualize your place in that which you refer to be the universe. Dont just think about it as you and the stars, and all that hollywood nonsense that we have been conditioned to associate the contemplation of our existence with, really think about abrasive reality of what is really fucking happening RIGHT NOW. There is no stars, there is balls of fuel and raging infernos. There is no "you" there is the conversation between organ systems in a language you necessarily dont understand while allowing you to make your own. If everyone were to truly visualize their place in the cosmos, the world would be a more harmonious place. A persons understanding of the world, its complexity and sophistication is commensurate to their ability to percieve the context of their existence, their awareness of injustice and how easily they can be controlled.

YOU ARE HERE NOW. LIVING. BREATHING. YOUR EYES ARE WET. YOU DONT NOW WHY. SOON YOU WILL BE FRAIL. SOON YOU WILL BE DUST. THIS IS IMPORTANT.

It is a thought that can and should be evoked in our darkest, and more importantly our brightest hours. No matter how high a podium a human being stands on, that podium is indefinitely pegged into the foundation of the earth. So why then do we fight? Why then do we bother resisting corrupt governments and corporations? What is it in us that motivates us to challenge hegemony? It isnt a desire to be free, rather it is our inclination to homeostasis, balance, and justice.

I am not optimistic, nor is this a state that I feel should be aspired to. Optimism is preyed upon by opportunistic people, and the bulk of the former is naive and delusional anyway. I do believe however as I always have that transhumanism and "type 1 civilizations" are not something we should fear (i.e. planetary rule) but in fact aspire to... homeostatically. Michio Kaku explains the type one civilization as one which has mastered their environment, and shifted to a global political paradigm from a regional one. Unlike Michio Kaku (reknown scientist), I dont believe that we must blindly subscribe to any old "planetary civilization model" simply because its the one being offered, and because its our "destiny". If this world government that Kaku is trying to sell is so important to ensuring our survival, than it shouldnt require the many deceptions it has to be actualized (i.e. money, global warming, terrorism). If this truth Kaku entertains is so critical, then I am sure he would sooner it be achieved through diplomatic and as enlightened a means as possible, discluding the free for all of multinationals, oligarchs and banking cartels that would fashion this concentration of power with the same tools they used to chizzle out soveriegn dictatorships that spawned them. Yet he doesn't. He calls anyone who disagrees with G20 hegemony "terrorists", and anyone who is skeptical as ridden with fear (something he views in the negative except when he is fueling the fear for 2012).

Kakus unified civilization cannot arise using fear to coax people into buying into it, people have to first comprehend its importance, and not be tricked into the state of 'technopoly' in which we simply passively accept technology without considering the corrupt context from which it emerged. How can we ensure the integrity of this upcoming global society which will dictate our destiny as a species hereafter if we cannot even minimize corruption on a regional scale.

Can we at the same time have our motives for unification be ridden with fear while attempting to transcend the "problem> fear > solution" level of consiousness so pervasively used in nation building? If fear is what knitted the fabric of regional tyranny that blankets the sleeping world, what should we expect from a global patchwork utilizing the same seamstress? Its like the "green economy" movement and trying to mandate higher conscious behaviours (awareness of ones environment) using the lowest level of consciousness as a motivator (i.e. greed, money).

Freedom in the truest sense of the word entails universal bastardization. It entails a functionless excess, an unpredictable, chaotic, and subatomically boun disorder. In fact nothing is free, everything is sandwiched between something else. Freedom is an illusion. Freedom in its realist form is a nightmare, and is physically impossible.

The fact is freedom is unattainable, whereas Justice and balance are. Therefore I am changing the "freedumb movement" to the "justice movement". To the avail of no one, but these zeros and ones and zeros and ones....

Kaku uses fear to warrant the NWO, the same tactic practiced by the terrorists he claims "hate our tolerance". Like most scientists woven into the academic complex he is a pragmatic genius who is fundamentally and philosophically wrong.

I only recently watched this movie (Religulous 2008, a documentary by Bill Maher) after a family member had rented it, typically I would have avoided it all together because I think Bill Maher is a loudmouth Zionist asshole, who fronts as a progressive and yatta yatta yatta all the rest. However now I have yet another example of his stealthy pro-war shillary. Here is the plot of the documentary.

(checkmarks note agreement)

1) To show how the bulk of religious beliefs are hogwash (✓)
2) To show how religion makes people do crazy shit (✓)
3) To show how anyone who disagrees with the creation of Israel is completely insane (X)

So how is it that Zionist Bill Maher (and anyone who endorses Israel) is more deluded then the religious? Well... simply, because Zionism is based on a religious/ political idea!

It’s quite simple. Israel has nuclear weapons; they are used as a NATO proxy to bring "democracy" to the Middle East (i.e. widespread death and destruction, hegemony, monetary enslavement and the illusion of choice).

Israel wanted a war with Iraq, and Afghanistan, as they want a war with Iran, Lebanon (in progress), Palestine, Syria, Egypt and anyone else in the region who hasn’t bowed down to global Zionist hegemony.

If you support Israel you support war (period). Anyone who criticizes the Iraq war, yet supports Israel is either mistaken or just pretending. There are no two ways about it. For example: Some indignant misguided Jewish nunce had the audacity to hound me the other day for hoisting a sign that Bush was a Zionist patsy, while his own sign critiqued the Bush administration for war crimes. He went out of his way to spend the whole protest drawing even more attention to me by making a sign that said "don’t listen to this guy". Sure enough his attempt at provocation was a complete failure because he merely drew more attention to my sign (thanks school boy!). Regardless even though he had a sign protesting Bush, his fundamental beliefs did more to justify that war than his feeble mind will permit him to understand.

Anyways I digress, the point is Bill Maher’s whole purpose in this documentary was to reinforce the idea that Zionism is good, while concealing it with his criticism of religion... let me explain it in point form.

• He spends the first hour of the shitumentary visiting miscellaneous Christian churches, even getting booted out of the Vatican to appear all the more legitimate. He amuses himself at how much smarter he is than the average fox news viewer and their televangelical philosophy (wow Bill, we are really impressed). In doing so he accurately critiques the market of religious ideas and foolery, and basically performs a comedic/ agnostic version of a Richard Dawkins 2 hr special (minus the equally deluded atheism). Fair enough. He gives all of these people ample time to speak, and then ridicules every ridiculous belief they utter and proceeds to relish in this accomplishment several times. CONGRATULATIONS BILL YOU RAGING ZIOLLECTUAL YOU... HOW ORIGINAL TOO!!!
• Then he goes and speaks with an Orthodox Rabbi who rejects the idea of Israel and the unnecessary havoc it has wreaked (who Bill conveniently associates with holocaust denial/ "revisionism"). While the Rabbi is trying to explain why he disagrees with Israel (and it should be noted he is the most logical of all in the documentary), Bill makes a habit of routinely interrupting him and twisting the rabbis every word, he gets frustrated (as scripted) and storms out of the meeting (hypocritically, after having been thrown out of numerous meetings with Christians prior in the film for his cheap shot humour). NOTE: He did not get up and leave willingly ONCE in ALL the interviews he conducted in the film, EXCEPT for the one with the rabbi who disagreed with the POLITICAL/ RELIGOUS ideology of Zionism!!! HE WAS HOPING PEOPLE WOULDNT NOTE THE BLATANT CONTRADICTION!!! I DID BITCH!
• Then after proving that he wasn’t 'just' out to get Muslims, (i.e. attacking Christianity for an hr) he moves on to Islam, in which he analyzes in political, terms (i.e. not religious terms). I say again, he critiques the RELIGOUS beliefs of Christians, and spends the rest of the movie defending Zionism, and MOSTLY focusing on the POLITICS of Islam, and only the radical stuff of course. When he asked a Muslim cleric about the violence and radicalism of Islam, the Cleric responded “that this is merely the consequence of politics) Bill then dodges this statement by playing dumb, and proceeds to pester the cleric about other trivial nuances of the religion.
• At the end of the movie he pretends to be an objective agnostic again, by claiming that his only purpose with the film was to promote doubt and scepticism. After endorsing the religiously substantiated/ political ideology of Zionism and debunking FUNDAMENTALIST forms of all religion, he extrapolates his critique to the teachings of all religions in GENERAL! While not going anywhere near Buddhism because they just mediate anyways... He takes the most extreme examples of all religions, and uses them to reject those religions in their entirety altogether.

Now I am not religious, but I am moral, I follow what could be viewed as the scientific equivalent of the golden rule (i.e. the utilitarian code). That basically we should do unto others as we would like them to do unto us, and make an effort to make the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people in any situation. Additionally insofar as I realize humanity does not need religion, and that it is a tool of social control ecploited to wage resource wars, I have met many religious people who are VERY GOOD CARING PEOPLE. Bill Maher’s critique of religion is elementary, illogical easily refuted, while his defense of Zionism is hypocritical and naive, if not intentional as is the case will most Ziowhores.

DONT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS PIECE OF SHIT NWO PROPAGANDA FILM.