Picture

By Neighthan Hueman
"Functional fixedness is a cognitive bias that limits a person to using an object only in the way it is traditionally used."- ickypedia<<<(who is part of the probl... nevermind)

Most of you already know what I am about to say, for those who don't I am using the psychological principle described above to communicate to you something essential about the process of bringing forth actual change, not simply a change in fake representation.

1) Revolutions do not come with instructions. If they did they would not be revolutions. Check. You can also not compare or draw from things done in the past or by others for direction (at least not entirely) as it was under different circumstances and simply will not work. 

"The eagle never lost so much time as when it submitted to learn from the crow"- Deadman (good movie!!!)

2) Revolutions mustn't necessarily reject everything from the old order, but they must remodel parts of it that provide that systems most crucial base level functions. For example you couldn't significantly bring forth any meaningful change without tampering with the roots, the under infrastructure of the society (MONEY). Without changing that, you don't have a revolution. Ever wonder why you pay interest???? Nevermind...

3) Revolutions require the tools that are typically exercised by the oppressor to keep slaves subdued but must be utilized in ways that were originally unintended and innovative. After all, most of the technology we see around us wasn't innovated by old rich fucks it was done by nerds who liked being nerds, and eccentric nutcases too!!! 

4) Revolutions require more then the mere application of that systems technology and media in some meaningful way in order to revitalize the most crucial aspects of it... One cannot ramble and rant on the internet to their hearts content in an attempt to infiltrate the hive mind... forever.

5) The means of the revolution would always dictate the end of its subsequent reign. If people with guns were to theoretically take over the parliament and basically take over the country, they will not have "revolted", they just volted! They didn't do anything new, in fact they merely beat their oppressor at their oppressors game...

6) A REAL revolution (if one ever really wanted to entertain such a notion considering the circumstances) requires we use what makes us human (Creativity, the right brain) to escape the imprisonment of the cognitive laws of functional fixedness. We must think outside the box "office", there is no instructions get it!!!

7) Any one claiming to be a part of a revolution yet also has a "store" on their website, wants money or a vote is clearly bullshitting you (to some extent at least, but obviously where it counts the most... when it really boils down to it). 

"You get what you pay for"-anon.
Add Comment
 
 
So rich people own everything and you misconstrue freedumb for the choice between engineered options.

Day in and day out. Until you are dead.

As I descend into the lonely uncharted territory self-reflection brings I need to constantly remind myself why I felt so compelled to initially indulge in this journey. When a person begins “waking up” they first realize the “reality” which knits what they have grown to critic and resolve with idealistic hollywood viewpoint is in fact a cold, harsh and existentially bound series of ideas and institutions headed by ruthless power hungry individuals you were told your whole life were your friends. When you begin this quest you may start by expressing your anger and dislike of the many unjust practices which require human suffering for their existence. You may want to “feed the starving people” and that in itself is enough (in your eyes) to devote your time and make sacrifices for a cause greater then yourself. Then you probe deeper and deeper still, you realize that it is not so simple as “the corporations vs humans”, you realize that you have been indoctrinated with a status quo affirming education and that your lexicon for challenging this oppression was developed there as well (Orwellian literature). You realize that the motive to “feed the starving children” will not suffice in motivating the brainwashed selfish masses to take the necessary action to dismantle the web of lies they have assembled and become dependent upon. You realize that these people have been trained to ingest information in a certain way, and that any enlightening must utilize (somehow) these neural conduits hollowed by mindfuk incorporated in order to communicate with them. Essentially, you have to dumb it down. 

So What the fuck am I trying to say?  

The more committed to fadsmashers I become the more its meaning becomes dissolved, I see myself doing it out of obligation more so then necessity (EVEN THOUGH ITS MORE NECESSARY NOW THEN EVER!!!), as is the natural progression of any artistic endeavor goes that gains an audience with demands, expectations and the need for some consistent approach. It’s like saying the same word over and over again until it loses all meaning. When it does lose meaning (for me), I feel compelled to transcend my old thinking and establish a new one that is more refined and concise. The problem is you end up straying so far from the shore that no one understands what the fuck you are talking about eventually. I seriously am skeptical of anyone who constantly touts the same old lines, posts the same old shit, for years on end, and doesn’t show any signs of an evolving opinion; those who seem to have become concretized in their ideology simply stopped thinking.

It’s not how long one has studied sociopolitics that is important; it’s how fast they progress through the stages.  I could easily keep my media within the confines of what is comprehensible by the people I am trying to enlighten, but I would not be being true to pursuit of virtue, justice, and honesty. This entails when we have it figured out, that we step back. For example: Just because Zionist influence (namely those of Jewish descent) seem to have every oppressive industry on lock down, it’s not enough to simply call these people out, as there is an agenda that is equally sinister that awaits taking its place, and will leech the efforts of anyone trying to do this towards its own ends. My critic of Zionism, is not an endorsement either directly and or indirectly for these halfwit trigger happy self-serving types who simply don’t trust the government and want to replace the ziosphere with their primitive ideology which ultimately only serves the needs of the wealthy capitalists assholes who fund the shock media that gets them in a economically viable scurry. Fadsmashers is more ethically and philosophically refined then that, in that we are honest and do not selectively bullshit ourselves whenever there is a pitfall to our ideology (which should be evolving). I also won’t say “fuck it” and won’t revert to nihilism or true cynicism (which entails not thinking you can change anything).

As a sidenote this is my declaration that I will never do "crazy shit", and if they say I did, they are full of shit.

I honestly and sincerely would like to make the world a better place to waste, I have no grande vision for how it should be (although I am working on it), and no ulterior motive asides from smashing and humiliating bullshit liars, their ideas and their lifestyles, humiliating the unquestioned lives of moral morons who are simply lead by the nose to any cause that seems worthy of a fight because they are bored out of their fucking minds, want some kind of moral balancing for being complicit. I have given up arguing with shitbrained selfish fox news viewers, instead I focus on those who watch Olbermann, and John Stewart because they mean well, but are as still brainwashed and complicit as the faux newstards they make a culture of criticizing. I honestly want an end to unjust human suffering, this requires that I teach people how to think critically, not teach them what to think.

If you still think its "all crazy conspiracy theories and stuffs" you are a brainwashed idiot who deserves it. You really do. I have no aspiration to save you.

I challenge you to think, and keep thinking, I challenge you to walk alone and really see it. If everyone is waving their fist at you, even your friends, then you are onto something DEEP. If not, you aint saying shit. Tragic indeed. But hip. Fucking hip.


3 Comments
 
 
Picture

JUDGING BY THE STATE OF THINGS YOU WOULD HAVE TO ASSUME THAT THIS PICTURE WAS TELLING THE TRUTH!!!!


The real status quotient 

It has come to my attention that there is no formula in existence to measure the intelligence of society as a whole. 

It is not enough to simply get all of the peoples IQ's and average them as that would only tell us half the story, it wouldn't say much for how these variables interacted to bring us this cutting edge ingenious civilization of failblogs, and haul videos.

This is not to say the IQ test is the end all and be all of intelligence measurement either, any good study would find a way to assess analytical ability, empathy and even creativity (not limited to problem solving) but for this colorful theoretical scenario we will assume that's all we need!!!

If one was to do this study, they would likely find that people with high IQ's are present anywhere across the class spectrum, or example they would find many instances were people with high IQ's worked for a wage for those with lower IQ's. In the big picture this will work itself out in backwards laws, corrupted values, environmental mismanagement and simply braindead blind conformist me-tards trying to change the system via social media that is owned and monitored by the people they so desperately want to change.

The best way to determine the collective intelligence of a society is by determining how many smart people are working for dumb people (NOT JUST BY HOW MANY SMART PEOPLE THERE ARE). So say you have an IQ of 140 and your boss touts 110, within this example there is a discrepancy of 30. Maybe your boss is smarter than his boss who only has an IQ of 90. Thus the total negative IQ discrepancy is 40 within this hire-archy. If this were done for everyone in society you could average those discrepancies to get a general number of how off that civilization is, or whether it should be considered one at all. 

If the sum total of all subordinate IQs is higher than the superordinates (or if sum of all hire-archies is in the negative) then you probably lived in a fucked up bullshit society that thinks its intelligent, free and meritocratic but it really isnt!!!! 

The overall legitimacy of a societies hire-archies will ultimately determine their potential for mere survival alone, transcending the Darwinian logic that got us here, will require something altogether different from hire-archy.

THE AMOUNT OF DISORDER WITHIN A CIVILIZATION IS PROPORTIONATE TO THE LEVEL OF INTELLIGENT PEOPLE WORKING FOR RETARDS. IT IS THE REAL STATUS QUOTIENT!!! 
.-Human

MORE ON THIS LATER!!!! 



Naytron Hominid
Add Comment
 
 
Add Comment
 
 
Picture
Buy Nathan Human

*This isn't a smash, its probably a lot more boring.

Humanism is a branch of psychology that emerged in opposition to the prevailing psychoanalytic (biological<<< YES biological) and behaviorist schools of thought of the 20th century which argued that human beings were condemned to act in certain ways on the basis of their past experiences. Some behaviorists went to such an extent to say that all human behaviour was predetermined, and that all of our actions were a predictable continuation of that initial unison between sperm and egg, and what came before that and before that and before etc. Within the behaviourist theoretical spectrum there are some theories which are more fundamentalist than others. Some claim all behavior is predetermined others leave room for free will. The underlying philosophical debate here is determinism (behaviourism) vs Free will (humanism). As I will attempt to show these are reconcilable and that the concept of dualism is itself fundamentally flawed, and only exists due to the need for temporality to understand the world, parse out our sensory perceptions, creating divisions, dialectics, and dualities is solely done for cognitions sake, whereas outside our perceptions everything is a unified seamless whole. 

Humanism took a proactive stance, viewing the individual as expansive and open, not closed and contracting, one in which the future was widening, as the past appropriately narrowed. Ironically, they thought any individuals goal in life was to scale a hierarchy of needs, they also thought that few would have the intellectual, spiritual, emotional capacity to traverse to the top (which we will see is no different from the bottom). At the top of the pyramid is self-actualization, a total awareness of self, which is purely theoretical, and impossible to prove quantifiably. One could assume this narrowing pyramidal structure which became smaller as one approached the top would be at odds with humanisms notions of endless expansion, but as we will see IT IS THE TRUTH we become more self-centered as we approach the top!!! The SELF is necessarilly a hierarchical concept, because it separates itself from the rest of the world. When a person has succeeded one of the levels in Maslows hierarchy, and if they do not have the means to get to the next level, they will become 'depressed'. Why do they become depressed? Western society needed a model that would adhere to capitalism, something which sounded great and would be promulgated by the hippies. Whats that? Expand your mind you say? Don't mind if I do!!! Before I do that though I need to expand my bank account yeah, and then get lots of security guards, and then get lots of friends, then get lots of love yeah, then and only then, can I totally focus on myself only!!!  

Humanism: All people aspire to spiritual wholeness, all people seek to meet their own needs, hierarchically, and create their own reality and discernments of what is right and what is wrong. HUMANISTS CLAIM THAT THE AIM OF HUMAN BEINGS IS STRIVING TO BE ALL -WE (SELF or I)- CAN BE. Ignorant to the context in which we emerged (environment, don't skip out on me just yet libertarians). It is at once the most attractive (psychotherapeutically speaking) yet self-destructive ideologies to ever have been foisted on the masses.

1) People are entitled to be selfish for the sake of spiritual transcendance (self actualization). Once you have enough to eat, and dont have to worry about terrorists, only then can you experience the ultimate oneness of knowing thyself (sarcasm).

2) If you are not exhibiting a low grade/ over the counter and constant happiness in the wake of the global destruction for which you are partly responsible, you are psychologically ill, usually "clinically depressed" or just undiagnosed if big pharma has yet to find a way to exploit your malconditioning (NOTE: Depressed people have been found -through research- to actually perceive the world MORE REALISTICALLY). Which is why I dont believe in depression, and believe it to be largely psychogenic (self-caused). I may have bad days, but never do I utter those captivating words "IM DEPRESSED". May as well cry because you are able to cry. Pathetic. 

3) Finding yourself, is more important than finding someone else, or finding someone else some food to eat.

4) Everything is about you, your growth, your tube, your friends, your family, your car, your comfort, and to top it off your self-centered cancerous enlightenment.

5) Everyone needs to be insecure because everyone else is trying to find themselves and most people are not as utilitarian (doing unto others as you would have them do unto you) as we would like. Instead they take, and take, and take, and take, forever expanding into cosmic night... I mean other peoples countries.

6) We now need alot of police to "protect" people (who are all trying to find themselves at the expense of everyone else) from one another. 

7) The quality and immensity of self-servitude we have accrued throughout the 20th and 21st century has diverted attention away from the global refuse left in the wake of our finding ourselves as cheaply as we can, and SURE AS DAY socioeconomic and geopolitical problems are starting to mount.

8) Sometimes we travel to other peoples countries we have oppressed (so that we can find ourselves at lower costs). We do this irregardless of the obvious long term consequences of being dependent on globalization (i.e. you cannot sustain yourself, and will collapse). We wanted to find ourselves for such a good price that we outsourced all of our industry to people trying to eat and find their family on 2 $ a day.

9) We wanted to buy things we couldn't afford, to create ourselves, so we borrowed money from the people we allowed to print it.

10) We wanted to be individuals, now here we are, individuated into cubicles, isolated, and increasingly predictable, unable to defend ourselves or organize meaningfully even along these monitored (open) airwaves. (i.e. the synopticon)

11) We wouldn't dare speak up, because people would think we were "crazy" for thinking of other people and this would hurt our I, because we believe what they say, because weDONT REALLY KNOW SHIT ABOUT WHAT WE ACTUALLY ARE!, AND DO NOT CARE TO KNOW, WE JUST WANNA BREED, SHIT, SMOKE, FUCK, AND DIE BETWEEN TAKING PICTURES OF US DOING THIS SHIT.

12) We lost it all, because we wanted it all. This is the nature of our world. (I could go on for WEEKS) <<<Honest Ego.

The truth is in the middle, neither humanism nor behaviourism or any extreme of any duality will ever replace the fact that we are one whole, one pulsating orb of life, one planetary membrane of deeply bound togetherness, half of us is constantly blanketed in light, and half is always (but never suspended) darkness, not 10% in light and 90% in darkness which is the case right now. Happiness is only half the story, everything is at a balance. Cynical Optimism is seeing the world as it is, so smash the rose colored glasses and use the instinct within you they have tried to repress called ANGER. They told you it was bullshit, that it has no use. 

I want you to be angry because other people cannot be happy. ANGER IS A GIFT, in many instances like this one, anger is a means to love, the yin reaching out to yang, not self-centeredness and "your happiness". The people in charge UNDERSTAND THAT THIS DISTINCTION IS BULLSHIT, THEY WANT YOU TO THINK THAT THE PYRAMID IS NATURAL... IT IS NOT. There is no nature vs nurture debate which can be reconciled as they are one and the same thing!!! Hierarchy doesn't exist, hence all the illuminati (spell checker wants to capitalize that but I wont) references to the pyramid, with the circle on top (eye), because they have retained the truth (the circle) on top this faux paradigm they have assembled. Ironically capitalists hoard the communism, they work together and conspire against us, those of us trapped in the pyramid, their false paradigm... Essentially then the pyramids as marking the onset of civilization, marked the onset of our detachment from nature and the separation of self and environment.

Life is circular, all interconnected, nothing of greater importance then anything else. Hierarchy and humanism are flawed arguments. Hierarchy cannot for the life of it expound on its origins or its destination, yet claims to be able to tell you everything in between!!! There is no definitive night or definitive day. My friends... we are freedetermined. When you achieve nirvana and then die from not eating and indulging in the right brain, it will make perfect sense. 

I am Nathan Human and I do this half for me, and half for the world I will never see!

Thanks for reading ;)



Picture

Within the eyes (round) there are two kinds of sight receptor cells, rods and cones (both round), detecting light and colour from the sun (round) respectively, then that info is shipped to other neurons (also round) which act as detector cells which then create images based on the LINES, and dots that our occipital lobe in the back of our brain (round) then splices all the bits together, this all happens thanks to cylindrical passageways called vessels. 

I could state countless circles, this is not really the point.

Cells, Intercellular stuff, vessicles, stones (oh yes its mine too) the earth, heads, fruits & veggies, the sun???, dirt, tree rings, atoms (in theory), a variety of animals, our bodies are a tube in sac design, the eyes, the mouth, Ass*****, ripples in the ocean, volcanoes from an angle, eggs, sperm heads, breasts, nipples, anything radially symetric (cylindrical to some extent). A womans belly that contains a human that will then use lines to see and create implant circles into other circles, black holes (another theory but yeah), hurricanes, most bugs blah blah blah

All of the things you speak of extenuate from the circle be it rocks (earth), shadows (sun), Leaves (tree trunk), the orbits (come after three round rocks are floating -around- one another). Even flowers whose triangular leaves form a circle to some degree STEM from the root, which is sometimes a bulb. Then round ass bees take it to hives in which they attempt (to the best of their triangular ability) to recreate the circle. Spider webs do the same. Then we as humans come along and realize that the dome is the strongest structure, that we cannot break an egg with our hand if equal force is applied throughout its surface. Many thought the earth was flat... indeed it was round. I made a mistake when I said the triangle was a human adaptation to understand the circle, it is in fact earthlings natural adaptation. The triangle indeed has immense value and is inextricably tied to our ability to exist. However...

There is a solution and it is the middle way. The cone for instance is a perfect example of where these two ideas meet. My own personal temporary conclusion is that this object is a more favourable example of what a societal pyramid should resemble. There are not levels, the levels are made by the lines (the limitations of our sensory), we impose that on the world. 

There is no CONTINUITY in the linear, there are some pretty common optical illusions you see that exploit humans misperception of continuity. The constellations are a GREAT example how we super impose meaning on round objects based on how the lines connect.

yet I recognize that both of these forces are necessary, for instance when objects collide in space they form triangles and then over time go back to their DEFAULT setting of circle, eventually... with time, all goes back to being a circle (gravity).

The point on the cone... where does it extend from? The circle. It ends at the circle. Some galaxies also have this imperfect shape (a cone) although they appear as flat spirals, extend the metaphor how you want. 

Consider a tornado, a perfect example of how its in and out, and they are mutually dependent, but again the triangle extends from the circle. The point of impact and destruction is the peak at which the triangle is now at its fullest... Triangles are destruction. They are necessary, but destructive. 
Picture
PS:

So every living being on this planet should be viewed as a strand, that extends from the outside of the circle to the inside (either way works), the height of its cone shape doesnt depend on how many people can be enslaved, it depends on how many people can work together. Wow... what a concept.

This is the middle way. We have been given lines to understand circles. The trinity, the pyramids have programmed us to three. 3rd times a charm? But three strikes your out? Oh really? What of the chaos and coercion these symbols have brought with them throughout the years? And to boot the backwards illuminazi logo, with its pyramids with levels and its hoarding of the circle atop this trick, peering at us all with that watchful eye and creating our reality, because the circle is what allows them to do it.

Imagine an old telescope, it is skinny through the eyepiece (which is circular where hominid sticks their circular eye) and gains more diameter as it approaches the end (circle), so at the point in which it meets the eye (closest to human) is at its peak most triangular-ity, as that approaches the end it becomes more and more circular until a vision is formed of cone shaped mountains in the distance. 

How about this one... dont get too disturbed. Cone shaped cups stacked atop one another. A cone begins as a wide hole and extends from it a little point that little point sticks into the next hole which comes to another point that enters another hole which repeats and repeats until you have this cylindrical vessel that has its own unique functions.... get it? Thats where we should be, we should be amassing that, but we are not, we are going to get version "avatar" another system has been created from all this cone sex, we cant see it because we dont see circles. We have been trained not to see it. They killed off the natives because they seen it. 

Men are linear, women are curved. Life is round, death is linear and cold. Linearity is patriarchy, ovularity is matriarchy, the cone however 
is a synthesis, it is tolerant of our measly triangle, and allows it to reach for the stars, it will not absorb us we are free to grow, but we done fucked up. 

The whole is a hole. 

THE CIRCLE IS WHAT IS UNDERNEATH AND ABOVE THE TRIANGLE WHICH WE USE TO SEE MY FRIENDS.

BUT....

Picture
4 Comments
 
 
Nathan Hominid

March 6th 2010

In light of our unconscious will to catastrophe of epic proportions, I have taken the liberty to clarify what I mean by the 'Epochalypse' in a dramatic way. I have done this in order to elicit uncontrollable emotional responses in the reader, in addition to delivering its epistemological purpose which no one gives a shit about, but is nonetheless required to keep academics confused while sounding pretentious and smarter then I actually am. This will be laid out in an upcoming short shockumentary adorned with the cosmic beats of Sir Archie Cooper that will cause your cerebrum to spontaneously combust.

It will be released in April 2010.

You likely have been blessed with the notion of impending doom to take place in late 2012, it carries your moments of self-loathing when you long for some collective misery to drown out your own and make you feel better.

I unknowingly was not the first to use the word, although the zeitgeist prevailed and zapped it into my head when I was trying to come up with a cheeky title for this twoof bomb, it sounds cool, and is not as depressing as the reality of the situation would have it and is thus 'acceptable' to the philosophically bankrupt retards and halfwits who dominate our lives.

For those of you who were hoping to not be burdened with the task of thinking ahead, and having a good excuse to not go to work on December 22nd 2012, you will suffer an immense disappointment when you awake yet again into the same tried and true mental enslavement; the same spiritual hell you are accustomed to, at which point you will suddenly go (even more) insane. Conveniently, most wont know it.

What will come to pass is the end of an epoch. A period of time characterized by a fine blend of freedumb, wasted prosperity, and notions of impending doom, will finally be put to rest and we will have no more excuses to live in fear. Concurrently (and tragically) our ability to influence the world in any meaningful way whatsoever will also have diminished entirely, as by that time the oppressive apparatus will have been fully assembled.

Right now you have the opportunity to do so. You have everything at your disposal right now that would enable you to assist dismantling the unjust hegemonic web of shit and lies that envelops you, chizzle by chizzle smash by smash, you very well could reclaim your fate. You have at this point in time, one last chance to take action and smash the lies for which there is no rational purpose other than their adherence to the foundation of lies that preceded them, and those that preceded them, and so on. I am confident you wont.

This foundation (this fundamental unbalanced belief that underlies our current global mode of being) is the pyramid, and the notion of hierarchy, if not rectified prior to this time, will damn us to suffer under its oppressive weight indefinitely.

In April 2010 Archie Cooper and Nathan Hominid, will set the record straight. One last attempt to lay the philosophical foundations for a refined and meaningful physical, spiritual, emotional and mental existence will be turned loose on the zeitgeist of information and it will be ignored, censored, and missed by billions while having no significant impact whatsoever.
2 Comments