Add Comment From futurity Why would fish follow a robot?Researchers at NYU built silent, remotely controlled, fish-like robotic swimmers that fit in the palm of a hand. These early designs can "swim" along a plane; the next step is to create robots that can dive and surface. Since fish of different sizes and species school together, engineer Maurizio Porfiri correctly hypothesized that they would not only accept a robotic peer that was larger than themselves but also welcome it as a group leader. ( NYU (US)--Forget artificial intelligence. How about artificial leadership? A mechanical engineer at New York University is combining smart materials and mathematics to build robots that lead schooling fish. Someday, Maurizio Porfiri, assistant professor of mechanical engineering atNYU’s Polytechnic Institute, hopes the robots could lead fish away from the turbines of power plants. They also could potentially lead flocking birds to new wintering grounds if their forests have been destroyed, or even herd humans to safety when a fire breaks out. First, however, engineers must uncover the mechanics of leadership for each of these life forms. Porfiri chose to start with the bait fish swimming in his tanks because their information-sharing is particularly rich: They make their decision on whether to school based upon what they see and the flow that they feel, which can be studied using fluid dynamics. Fish leaders, according to published report and to Porfiri’s observations, beat their tails faster, mill about, and accelerate to gain attention, gather a school, and lead it. Using a shallow, donut-shaped tank and cameras, researchers began a mathematical journey into fish schooling in one-dimensional environments. They recently reported their results from this study in the Journal of the Royal Society Interface. Meanwhile, they built silent, remotely controlled, fish-like robotic swimmers that fit in the palm of a hand. These first robots can “swim” along a plane; the next step is to create robots that can dive and surface. READ MORE Millions of libertarian activists persist in wasting their timecards protesting the concept of global warming, which is an effectively distractive debate which has been devised in order to distract people away from the fact that we don’t need oil anyway… Global Warming deniers righteously insist, and in a misguided renegade haste, that humans are not causing the rise in CO2. They use this as a foundation for their rightful challenging of the proposed carbon tax, which they insist is another mechanism of social control, while inadvertently supporting the idea of the free market. Although it is true that trying to regulate peoples behavior will never diminish the underlying problem of greed. However in partaking in this distraction their efforts are leeched by right wing corporate ass whores who think that in discounting the theory of what’s causing global warming it completely makes up for things like: 16 wild elephants rampaged through a village in Indonesia killing one person. The Animals destroyed a house and tore up several acres of farmland. Environmentalists claim that the highly intelligent animal retaliated for the illegal logging and farming which lead to the destruction of their natural habitats, forcing them to roam elsewhere for food. Villagers say it’s a recurrent problem as food is becoming scarcer in the region. While the animals take action, the primates who aspire to ‘dance with the stars’ sit on their ass like the frightened sex crazed conformists they have been trained to be. | Consumer Resources
ArchivesFebruary 2011 CategoriesAll |




RSS Feed