Alex Wissner-Gross has popularized the notion that the energy required for two google searches can power a kettle to make a cup of tea (equates to roughly 15 grams of CO2 produced). Cumulatively then, the 200 million plus searches a day are likley to have some negative impact on global warming, if that theory is proven correct. Its likely that this information is precedent to some sort of internet taxation ado with the environment (i.e. not the investment in alternative sources of energy that have been stunted in growth due to oligopical market forces) but a tax to ensure that you have to work more to consume the same amount.

Millions of libertarian activists persist in wasting their timecards protesting the concept of global warming, which is an effectively distractive debate which has been devised in order to distract people away from the fact that we don’t need oil anyway… Global Warming deniers righteously insist, and in a misguided renegade haste, that humans are not causing the rise in CO2. They use this as a foundation for their rightful challenging of the proposed carbon tax, which they insist is another mechanism of social control, while inadvertently supporting the idea of the free market. Although it is true that trying to regulate peoples behavior will never diminish the underlying problem of greed. However in partaking in this distraction their efforts are leeched by right wing corporate ass whores who think that in discounting the theory of what’s causing global warming it completely makes up for things like:

Oil spills, resource extraction practices, legitimates consumerism, biomagnifications of toxicants in our foods, sedimentation, over fishing, destruction of wildlife’s natural habitats, toxic waste from industry, consumption based waste, depleting forest which absorb CO2, non-renewable resources which are being extracted, soil erosion, extinct species and shrinking species diversity, contamination of waterways, pollution, genetically modified food nutrient deficiencies and the ecological imbalances they create ETC.

Nonetheless they are expected to carry on playing into the debate which seeks to focalize ecological efforts on worrying about being taxed, because that’s what they have been conditioned to care about, money and self-preservation! Instead of these VERY REAL ecological threats which we are currently facing, they focus on the one which seek to compromise the fake money in their pocketbooks.

Obama reveals his plan for a ‘cap-and-trade’ system approach to cutting green house gases, which his handlers claim will force a reduction in emissions to their 1990 levels by get this…2050! In spite of speculation as to the cause of global warming this liberal pipe dream claim that they will somehow bring levels down to that of 1990 (Which still entails a deathly release of Carbon monoxide according to people who purport this belief coupled with depleting natural forests, which should be mostly cut down by then) is monetary driven. His puppet masters are not expecting people to enhance their environmental ethics, rather they are going to tax people (most of which are merely at the whim of what’s given to them by the fake economies engineers) into complying! Which will drive even more greedy capitalists into poor countries… as intended, so to make the USA entirely reliant on international ‘free trade’!!! Yippie Toyotas for all! (not sarcastic at all…)