Leave it to the socially incompetent! Its gonna be seen as the whole burger and hot dog shaped soybean hypocrisy someday. Then they are slowly gonna move us onto one bio-chem mixture, taste and style will be banned (to compliment the existing stigma). Add Comment Cold temperatures damaging crops in Mexico 02/10/2011
FROM KVOA NEWS Cold temperatures damaging crops in Mexico NOGALES - Produce suppliers say last weeks cold temperatures haven't frozen crops in Sinaloa, Mexico since 1956. Now they're having to evaluate the damage before more products are brought to the U.S. "There are some plants that got severely damaged or some plants that were lost, so we are anticipating lower volumes going forward than normal volumes," Martin Ley said. Del Campo officials said they've never had to deal with this type of produce damage in the past, but thankfully not all was lost during last weeks freezing temperatures. "There was significant foliage damage and some damage to some of the fruits," Ley said. Ley said some vegetables and fruits were more susceptible to the freezing climate than others. "Tomatoes, peppers some eggplants still fare much better, and those plants are going to come back and recuperate," Ley said. Not only are produce suppliers noticing the affects of Mother Nature, but the Nogales Food Bank is also noticing a produce shortage. READ MORE From Popular Zcience Fresher Water Elevated phosphorus levels in water, often traceable to pig-waste runoff, are a major contributor to algal blooms that steal oxygen from fish and render drinking water toxic. Mitch Romanowski This little piggy went to market. This little piggy stayed home. And this little piggy is genetically modified to poop less phosphorus, making it the most environmentally friendly pig in the world. Like all animals, pigs' cells need phosphorus to make DNA, build cell membranes, and transport energy. But pigs can’t digest phytate, a phosphorus-heavy molecule in grains, so farmers fortify pig feed with pure phosphate or phytase, an enzyme that breaks usable phosphate off phytate. Still, pigs excrete nearly all the phosphorus they eat, and this washes into the ocean, where it feeds bacteria and algae that create oxygen “dead zones,” a major killer of marine wildlife. The Enviropig is the first swine (a Yorkshire, to be exact) able to digest phytate on its own. The project started a decade ago when Cecil Forsberg, a biologist at the University of Guelph in Ontario, genetically modified pigs so that their salivary glands would secrete phytase. This allows the pigs, now in their eighth generation, to get their phosphate from grains alone, and to excrete about 40 percent less of it. Switching to Enviropig herds will be expensive for farmers, Forsberg says, but in the long run subtracting supplements will save $1.75 per pig annually—a windfall for a 100,000-pig farm. He is currently petitioning the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Health Canada for permission to serve Enviropig meat. “Unfortunately, it is illegal for us to do taste tests at this time, despite the temptation,” he says. “But I expect they’ll taste quite good.” READ MORE FROM NEWS AU TINKER with the genetics of salmon and maybe you create a revolutionary new food source that could help the environment and feed the hungry. Or maybe you're creating what some say is an untested "frankenfish" that could cause unknown allergic reactions and the eventual decimation of the wild salmon population. The US Food and Drug Administration hears both arguments this week when it begins a two-day meeting on whether to approve the marketing of the genetically engineered fish, which would be the first such animal approved for human consumption. The agency has already said the salmon, which grows twice as fast as conventional salmon, is as safe to eat as the traditional variety. Approval of the salmon would open the door for a variety of other genetically engineered animals, including an environmentally friendly pig that is being developed in Canada or cattle that are resistant to mad cow disease. Read more: http://www.news.com.au/technology/we-can-build-whatever-animal-you-want-to-eat-say-scientists/story-e6frfro0-1225927239022?area=technology#ixzz10tp4e5um Unnatural Selection (documentary) 09/27/2010
Where food cums from 09/20/2010
Either Monsanto and friends will buy this and bury it, or its actually going to be sold by them while charging some annual stipend for using "their" property, (i.e. the suns light and rain and earth nutrients that makes plants) let robofarming commence... in 20 years, after shit has hit fan of course. PULLMAN, Wash. –Earth-friendly perennial grain crops, which grow with less fertilizer, herbicide, fuel, and erosion than grains planted annually, could be available in two decades, according to researchers writing in the current issue of the journal Science. WATCH INFORMATIVE VIDEO HERE Perennial grains would be one of the largest innovations in the 10,000 year history of agriculture, and could arrive even sooner with the right breeding programs, said John Reganold, a Washington State University Regents professor of soil science and lead author of the paper with Jerry Glover, a WSU-trained soil scientist now at the Land Institute in Salina, Kansas. “It really depends on the breakthroughs,” said Reganold. “The more people involved in this, the more it cuts down the time.” Published in Science’s influential policy forum, the paper is a call to action as half the world’s growing population lives off marginal land at risk of being degraded by annual grain production. Perennial grains, say the paper’s authors, expand farmers’ ability to sustain the ecological underpinnings of their crops. “People talk about food security,” said Reganold. “That’s only half the issue. We need to talk about both food and ecosystem security.” Perennial grains, say the authors, have longer growing seasons than annual crops and deeper roots that let the plants take greater advantage of precipitation. Their larger roots, which can reach ten to 12 feet down, reduce erosion, build soil and sequester carbon from the atmosphere. They require fewer passes of farm equipment and less herbicide, key features in less developed regions. By contrast, annual grains can lose five times as much water as perennial crops and 35 times as much nitrate, a valuable plant nutrient that can migrate from fields to pollute drinking water and create “dead zones” in surface waters. “Developing perennial versions of our major grain crops would address many of the environmental limitations of annuals while helping to feed an increasingly hungry planet,” said Reganold. Perennial grain research is underway in Argentina, Australia, China, India, Sweden and the United States. Washington State University has more than a decade of work on perennial wheat led by Stephen Jones, director WSU’s Mount Vernon Research Center. Jones is also a contributor to the Science paper, which has more than two dozen authors, mostly plant breeders and geneticists. READ MORE "However, organic farmers disputed the findings of the study. Cookstown Greens owner David Cohlmeyer said organic farmers use only natural pesticides as a last resort. Simon Jacques, Ontario representative for the organic certification program Ecocert, added the first priority of organic farmers are on rotating their crops, planting habitats for beneficial predators and looking for good soil, instead of using pesticides." This snippet from All headline news See article below from CBC Natural pesticides may hurt environment A new Canadian study suggests natural pesticides could cause more environmental damage than conventional chemicals. University of Guelph researchers said natural compounds often are used in higher doses than traditional chemical pesticides, resulting in potentially more problems for the water table and other parts of the ecosystem. "These data bring into caution the widely held assumption that organic pesticides are more environmentally benign than synthetic ones," said a synopsis of the paper published in the most recent edition of PLoS ONE, an online magazine that publishes medical and scientific research. Questions about natural pesticidesThe study places in doubt the conventional wisdom that has led to the banning of chemical pesticides in cities such as Toronto. Some municipalities have prohibited the use of synthetic compounds on the theory that artificial substances will leach into the ground and the water table and cause more long-lasting damage to the local ecosystem. Some provinces have already banned the use of so-called natural pesticides. The Guelph study did not address the safety of traditional pesticides, but instead examined the environmental impact of natural compounds by looking at the active ingredients of these substances based upon factors such as their leaching rates and toxicity to wildlife. The five Guelph scientists involved in the study, including Rebecca Hallett, a professor at Guelph's School of Environmental Science, looked at compounds used to combat soybean aphids, a major destroyer of that crop. Comparing two synthetic compounds to a pair of natural pesticides, Hallett and her colleagues discovered that the natural products were generally less effective at getting rid of the aphid. Thus, they needed to apply more of them to get the same result as the traditional pesticide. "Ultimately, the organic products were much less effective than the novel and conventional pesticides at killing the aphids and they have a potentially higher environmental impact," Hallett said. Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2010/06/23/guelph-pesticide-study.html#ixzz0rmyrMjng NOTE THE FOLLOWING OVERGENERALIZED HEADLINE WAS EXTRAPOLATED ON THE BASIS OF STUDYING 18 EGGS IN ONE REGION OF THAILAND!!!! ITS TOTAL BULLSHIT, ESPECIALLY THERE REASONS FOR WHY PEOPLE EAT THEM (i.e. NOT BECAUSE IT IS DISRESPECTFUL AND UNSANITARY, BUT BECAUSE ITS HEALTHIER!!!!) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Free-range eggs 'contain five times as much pollution as those from caged birds' By NIALL FIRTH Last updated at 2:15 PM on 17th June 2010 Free range eggs may contain high levels of pollution Ethical shoppers are being warned that free-range eggs may be less healthy than those from caged birds. Scientists found that free-range eggs contain at least five times higher levels of certain pollutants than normal eggs. Around 17 per cent of the free range eggs had levels that European regulators would have deemed unsafe for consumption. The study was carried out in Taiwan but the findings will raise concerns about the safety of eating free-range chicken eggs in the UK. Free-range chickens are those that have continuous access to fresh air, sunshine, and exercise, in contrast to chickens that are confined to cages. But scientists suspect that free-range chickens may risk getting higher levels of exposure to environmental pollutants, particularly PCDDs and PCDFs, potentially toxic substances that are produced as by-products of burning waste. Also known as dioxins, these substances may cause a wide range of health problems in humans, including reproductive and developmental problems and cancer. They found that the free-range eggs contained 5.7 times higher levels of PCDDs and PCDFs than the regular eggs. The scientists collected six free-range eggs and 12 regular eggs from farms and markets in Taiwan and analysed the eggs for their content of dioxins. Taiwan is a heavily populated, industrialized island with many of the municipal incinerators that release PCDDs and PCDFs. But the authors of the report warned that the issue could be more widespread. They wrote: 'The issue of contamination in free range eggs could be a global issue, and more research should be done to identify the factors from the external environment that influence and modify the PCDD/F levels in eggs from free range hens.' The researchers believe the free range eggs contain pollutants which the hens pick up from being free to feed in the open. They said the chemicals were present in 'feedstuffs, soil, plants, worms and insects'. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1287301/Free-range-eggs-contain-times-pollution-caged-birds.html#ixzz0r8zNSjPO | Consumer Resources
ArchivesFebruary 2011 CategoriesAll |








RSS Feed