Infowhores recently published an article with a headlie that presumes the health care bill will destroy American global economic dominance, and not:

1) Countless imperialist wars

2) Outsourcing labour to make goods US gluttons cannot afford

3) Making drugs illegal to flush money down the toilet of the state subsidized prison industry...

4) Usury/ private banking...

5) Etc.
Picture
SPOKEN FROM THE PATSIES OWN MOUTH!!!!

“I think what they’ll do is they’ll give in to some of the transparency at the same time they’ll give them more power,” Mr. Paul said. “We’re going to be bugging you a lot more. We’re going to be keeping eyes on you. That might be the way. Maybe inadvertently I’ll help them get more power at the Fed.”

WELL.... SOUNDS FKN GREAT!!!!
 


Comments

TargeT

11/10/2009 00:34:40

Ron Paul is just saying its the "last straw" he's been preaching about our foreign policy, monetary policy and "big government" for over 30 years, but no one cares or listens, one statement tying the controversial health care bill to the controversial economy sure grabs headlines though, doesn't it?


 

Human

11/10/2009 01:15:23

Its simply the application of the socratic method.

If he was a threat to anyone he wouldnt get ANY coverage, in fact he would likely be dead or bought off (which indeed he is). The guy scammed 5 million from people in the last election with the help of Alex Jones (the master of money bombs). He is merely there to control the people who own guns. The Ron Paul cultus exude the epitomy of "doublethink". They trick themselves into believing a guy believes something when he explicitly states he doesnt (i.e. 9/11 corruption) and yet somehow will open the pearly gates to freedom!!! KEEP DREAMING! Which is clearly ok of course because he needs to win votes from religious idiots who dont know how to think and has to keep his real views on the downlow so not to be shot down by the mainstream media which could blackball him in a myriad of other ways if they wanted to anyway... right. To boot, the brunt of his fanbase is motivated by self-interest, the same thing that caused the problem.

Americans have been duped into believing they can vote in a revolution. Its called controlling the opposition. Textbook. Obamas run to the top was the same, get him to vote against the war and blah blah woof woof, a bunch of inconsequential consessions here and there... Make him look antithetical, and revolutionary by asking him dumb questions so he can respond with what seems to be the only voice of reason. It honestly doesnt say much to appear a bit smarter than a bunch of harebrained politicians.

His libertarian/ capitalist politrick is the soil from which the weed of "corporatism" (<<<THEIR NEW WORD) spawned. How timely is it that after 30 years, the guy only shows up after they have stolen all your money, and already have the world on lockdown, the oil is already flowing and the moneys all been spent!!! Your country is Israels bitch. And how timely his arrival is indeed.

What the fuck would auditing the fed do in 2012 when his campaign manager Alex Jones (who believes 95% of the population will be killed off) fearmongers him into the presidency? Your country owes money to everyone, and your all in debt up to your necks! "ATTEMPTING" to audit the fed, wont do jack at this point. He is just there to give you more false hope. While reality is buried at the bottom of Alexas web rank. (your talking to it).

As for it being contraversial... For one if anything is contraversial they want it to be, because they control EVERYTHING, including google . They have to play him up as revolutionary so to make it appear legit.

The bottom line is you dont vote in revolutions, its oxymoronic to believe such things.

 

TargeT

11/10/2009 23:49:45

I couldn't agree more, this is very easy so make comments like this from the outside, but we are not england, we are not France, we are not china, we are not anything but what we are.

we have the largest military in the world, we have heavily armed militarized police, we dare not give them a reason to turn these "tools" against the general populace, we know what would happen, especially since 7/8ths of the population still watches their hypnoboxes, lives paycheck to paycheck and is burried in debt.

No free thinking (there's no time, gotta put in that 80 hour work week to live beyond our means) no free thought, everything form of entertainment has an agenda, a message and NLP is everywhere.

what would you have us do that we haven't considered already?

 

-Human

11/11/2009 07:24:22

A friend of mine put it this way,

"all of their robots, military gadgets, big brother technology can be likened to microsoft, wheras those outside the grid can be likened to an open source medium like linux, on which the possibilities are endless"

The machine is stitched together with binary code, it receives input and reacts correspondingly with a preprogrammed output, it is not conscious and as such is ultimatley limited. We are extremely conscious. Extremely unpredictable. We pour water on their machines. With class, and style. They hate us. 1/8 is more than they could possibly handle. Organization in this instance is our enemy.

All we can do is prepare, and make people aware. Defend ourselves when the time comes. Embrace the constitution through our actions, and add one more amendment: It is my obligation as a citizen to uphold the constitution not only for myself but for all 'human beings' who abide by the same oath or who have yet to have been granted the right to do so, because if I were to not do this... I would never be secure.

"injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere"

"When they told you to be an individual, they meant that you should be selfish""

Canada is tethered to this warship, when it tanks we will follow.

Prepare. Enlighten. Think free, thats their worst enemy.


 

Daniel

11/20/2009 23:34:57

I don't think organization is the enemy, though collectivism is dangerous. I think without organization, without systematized action we all run the risk of turning into Shakespeare's 'Hamlet'. The rest of the statements above I agree with.
The problem I face is whether or not action should be taken. Say we succeed? ...Say the world, or one small part of it is once again free (Spain 711-1492, and the US pre-1871), what happens then? History proves that eventually it'll flounder, and that freedom is at best an historical abberation.
The vast majority of people truly don't appear care.
13% Think for themselves, 50% are willing to push the button so long as they can abdicate responsibility, 28% are sociopaths (in North America), stack that together and you have responsible moral freethinkers at 5.25%. We're in the minority folks.
We get someone to preach hope, bloodshed ensues, a new bureaucracy replaces the old, our grammar changes a bit. Nothing really happens. If we want to succeed, we need to eliminate banks, and nepotism. Period. If we can do that, everything can be fixed. If we can't do that, nothing, no matter what happens, will ever change. But should it?
We seemingly get what we want via the majority (hence why I hate democracy). Minority privelege, majority rule is a terrible concept in that the betterment of the whole is always sacrificed, if even considered. I'm not into socialism in its myriad forms either. I think pure Capitalism is the only fair, unbiased agent for freedom (No banks, and usury are not Capitalism). No matter what, in the end it's all a beautiful nightmare.
It's sad to see the thinkers, and fighters of this day play out all their energy in such impotent mediums like the internet, protests, and music. Wake me up.

 



Leave a Reply